Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Most teams had Tyreek Hill off the board

Nails

By Nails,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
Just now, Yaboychris28 said:

No it's not, but I personally believe a mistake a young man does at the age of 19 should not destroy his entire life if he accepts responsibility for his wrong doings and serves his time and punishment, which he clearly did if you look up the facts of the whole incident

Not getting to play in the NFL doesn't count as "destroying someone's life".

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Nails said:

This is about hypocrisy, nothing more.  The Carolina Panthers lost a legit chance at the Super Bowl in 2014 and certainly 2015 without extra rollover salary and/or a comp pick.  Now, the Chiefs can waltz away with perhaps hardware without nary a peep of backlash?  Not good enough.

The answer to that question is that the Chiefs should get more backlash; not that we should do what they did.

Rae...Carruth...remember?

Top Dawg was right.  That name is way more relevant to this discussion than Greg Hardy's name is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Yaboychris28 said:

For most people no it wouldn't, but for guys like him, let's face it, most likely  it would

Sorry.  I just can't justify throwing an NFL salary at a kid who's got that kind of capability inside him.

As has been said before, "Winning is hard enough.  Who needs a time bomb?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Confined9991 Newbie

Confined9991

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The answer to that question is that the Chiefs should get more backlash; not that we should do what they did.

Rae...Carruth...remember?

Top Dawg was right.  That name is way more relevant to this discussion than Greg Hardy's name is.

Stop comparing it to Rae fuging Carruth, apples and oranges

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Confined9991 said:

So pre-meditated murder equals domestic violence now, glad you guys aren't in charge of anything 

I think there's a word you should probably research here.

It's the word "violence".

In both cases here, this thing called "violence" was committed against a woman and a child.

If you find no issue with this sort of thing, I'd say "confined" is probably appropriate (maybe even prophetic).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captain Obvious Proficient

Captain Obvious

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I think there's a word you should probably research here.

It's the word "violence".

In both cases here, this thing called "violence" was committed against a woman and a child.

If you find no issue with this sort of thing, I'd say "confined" is probably appropriate (maybe even prophetic).

unborn child. they're not that important to the majority of feminists. but yeah punching the girl was wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
Just now, Captain Obvious said:

unborn child. they're not that important to the majority of feminists. but yeah punching the girl was wrong.

Also choked her.

And regardless of what side you come down on, not really a "choice" issue here given that the act in question was perpetrated by someone other than the mother. Depending on the laws, deliberately causing a miscarriage can be prosecutable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...