Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Charlotte Observer says more necessary to prevent concussions


top dawg

Recommended Posts

The Charlotte Observer (perhaps Disturber in this case) has built a database of NFL injuries, analyzed the data, and put together a report.

"The Observer’s analysis showed that both offensive and defensive players in open-field positions were more vulnerable to concussions than linemen."

Person and Off go on:

"Wide receivers (12) and tight ends (10) were among the five position groups who suffered the most concussions, the data show.

But 15 cornerbacks – the most of any position – missed at least one game, as well as 11 safeties.

Linebackers, who also play a big role in run defense, were the other position group in the top five, with 11 players missing at least one game with a concussion."

Of course Luke Kuechly would be in that number.  In my opinion Luke's first concussion as a pro was directly related to leading with his head, which is a real problem.

“They were tackling with their head,” said Cantu, clinical professor of neurosurgery at Boston University’s School of Medicine. “Plus the fact that they’re in the open field so they’re colliding at full speed, whereas the stuff in the (offensive and defensive) line there’s been less of a run-up of speed.

“They’re bigger, stronger, faster – and they’re faster obviously when they’re in the open field. And unfortunately many of them are continuing to use their head for that open-field tackle.”

There is more that can be done to greatly lessen the amount of concussions, and one of the ways seems to be directly related to tackling.

"In Seattle, Seahawks coach Pete Carroll and his staff began teaching rugby-style tackling a few years ago to promote player safety. The technique is based more on leverage rather than defenders leading with their heads."

Another way, as mentioned in the article, is basically to disallow the head as a legal target. The NFL needs to stop the headhunting!

Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/sports/nfl/carolina-panthers/article129364244.html#storylink=cpy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

About damn time some mainstream media recognizes the issue. If we are being completely honest they ought to be writing articles whenever a player (any player although I'm referencing cam) is intentionally hit in the head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
    • Football is not the professional sport where timidness and apprehension are justly rewarded. 
    • Bryce Young had a super high floor definitely at least won't be a bust safe pick we allegedly had seen in some time.......and went on to have one of the worst rookie seasons of all time.  They are all lotto picks.  And that is especially true for whatever they will be day 1 in the NFL.  I don't think Tmac is a sure thing year 1.  It's not like we watched him do his thing in the SEC.  He was a PAC12 guy.  I'm sure it will take time
×
×
  • Create New...