Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Draft Talk: Let's look at 1-7 and DL possibilities


davos

Recommended Posts

So this is arguably the deepest part of the class and I just want to break something down defensive wise.  I can for sure see at least one trade happening before 8 so we'll see.  

--

1. Cleveland (3-4)

-This looks like Garrett's landing spot no matter what happens with the team in the top position 

2. 49ers (4-3)

-They are transitioning to a 4-3 so I find this interesting.  They may target a rookie to become a rock on their line (Allen or Thomas) but other talents are possible like QB.  *edit: They have invested in DL recently so they are up in the air.  

3. Bears (3-4) *no go

-They have already heavily invested in their front 7 (Goldman, Bullard Floyd) so I think they will be looking elsewhere.  This team needs a major overhaul.  Hooker, Adams, or a QB could go here.   

4. Jaguars (3-4) *no go

-Their buzz is around similar guys we've been discussing a la Adams, Fournette, and Hooker.  They also quietly had a strong defense last year.  I see a focus on Fournette if his ankle checks out. 

5. Titans (3-4) *no go

-They seem to be fixated on finding a receiving weapon for Mariota, don't really see them going DL  

6. Jets (3-4) *no go

-Another landing spot for Fournette or a top DB (Lattimore/Humphrey).  They have Richardson, Leonard Williams, Wilkerson and McClendon...dont' see DL 

7. Chargers (3-4) *no go

-New city that doesn't want them, just went splashy with a top defensive lineman last year, I see elsewhere for their pick.  

--

I see two teams barring trades that appear as ideal landing spots for Garrett, Allen, and Thomas.

I also see two potential spots without trades for Fournette.  If his ankle checks out and the Jags don't take him, I really do see a team trading ahead of us for him.  

That leads me to this point: We're trying to guess in our many mocks which top talent will still be available at 8 and I believe that player will be Solomon Thomas.  

 I personally think we will run to the podium if he is still available.  Just wanted to do this quick rundown because I see a lot of people grabbing guys ranked online in the 10-20 range being viable at 8 but being this high in the draft, I'm thinking in the other direction.

Solomon is a name to keep an eye on, could very well be available and would fit in really nicely here. 

Feel free to copy and paste the 1-7 portion with team notes/predictions/etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JawnyBlaze said:

I wouldn't mind Thomas, but I'd be so disappointed if we don't get Fournette or at least Adams or Hooker (assuming we don't sign Berry). 

I see it as an unfortunate possibility

An argument can legit be made for every team ahead of us needing a boost in the secondary, and again, if Fournette won't need surgery, he is a top talent I just can't see lasting to 8.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the 49ers are switching to a 4-3, I don't see how Allen would help them. They already drafted Buckner and Armstead the past two years in the first round who are both 4-3 DTs like Allen. I honestly think he could slip to 8 especially if a QB or 2 goes before we pick. We all know G-Man would really struggle with passing on a guy like Allen if he's there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, panthers34 said:

If the 49ers are switching to a 4-3, I don't see how Allen would help them. They already drafted Buckner and Armstead the past two years in the first round who are both 4-3 DTs like Allen. I honestly think he could slip to 8 especially if a QB or 2 goes before we pick. We all know G-Man would really struggle with passing on a guy like Allen if he's there. 

Fair point on the Niners.  

I also think Lynch & Shanahan are going to want to make a statement with their pick on a top guy who should have no problem making the NFL leap; that's usually not the QB.  Basically, people are mocking QBs to the Niners but I can see them making a surprising move.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly I believe Dalvin Cook (barring off field issues) is a perfect fit for the Panthers and may be their selection. If Thomas is the pick I will not be extremely mad but I will be scratching my head as Manos said I do not see him as a fit on our defensive line. I would like Fournette but Cook put up great numbers against solid to good defenses. Fournette struggled against good defenses. While some of that could be on LSU's offensive line it says a lot about him. Cook was more consistent in college and while he is not as great of a runner as Fournette he is a better pass catcher. Could relieve some pressure from Cam Newton on blitzes as a quick dump option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Manos said:

I'm not a huge fan of Thomas as a 4-3 DE. He just doesn't strike me as twitchy or big/long enough to be an elite passrusher. His motor and instincts are great but that only gets you so far in the NFL.

Sent from my XT1254 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app
 

I understand the measurables but sometimes you've got to look at the consistency, intangibles, and production in college.  He was able to manhandle a lot of the higher level OLs in the college ranks.  

I do agree however we need that long, lean edge rushing type on this defense.  There's a good deal in the draft beyond Round 1 so we could double dip and get two guys to compliment each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Hammerin'Cameron1 said:

He's small he's going to get neutralized by NFL tackles

You can just look at Taco and Solomon and tell Taco is the baller of the two. Solomon Thomas is a lame.

Small? He's bigger than taco. 273 vs 265. He's a bit shorter, but Thomas is bigger. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand the measurables but sometimes you've got to look at the consistency, intangibles, and production in college.  He was able to manhandle a lot of the higher level OLs in the college ranks.  

I do agree however we need that long, lean edge rushing type on this defense.  There's a good deal in the draft beyond Round 1 so we could double dip and get two guys to compliment each other.


I don't think he will be a bad player exactly, I just don't think he really fits as a 4-3 de. Honestly if he could add about 20lbs I think he would make a fantastic 3 tech DT. Don't know how his frame would handle that weight but I definitely think that is his best chance to be a great NFL player.

Sent from my XT1254 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, davos said:

Fair point on the Niners.  

I also think Lynch & Shanahan are going to want to make a statement with their pick on a top guy who should have no problem making the NFL leap; that's usually not the QB.  Basically, people are mocking QBs to the Niners but I can see them making a surprising move.   

Yea, Fournette

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Manos said:


I don't think he will be a bad player exactly, I just don't think he really fits as a 4-3 de. Honestly if he could add about 20lbs I think he would make a fantastic 3 tech DT. Don't know how his frame would handle that weight but I definitely think that is his best chance to be a great NFL player.

Sent from my XT1254 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app
 

What I see a lot of sites commenting is that he's a 2 down 4-3 DE who slides to 3-tech on passing downs.  Although, I see 3 down potential and a plug-and-play talent.

Also: I understand it's more than just weight+height combo when talking frame but don't forget our own Charles Johnson is 6'2 275.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...