Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kupchak!?


MountainHeel66

Recommended Posts

With Mitch being bounced from LA and the failures of Rich Cho is there any chance that MJ would seek out Mitch for the front office?

 

Keep in mind that there is a Carolina connection with Mitch and MJ and that Mitch has been one of the longer tenured GM's in the league and has multiple championships. I think it would certainly be a step forward from RC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Eazy-E said:

I swear some of you don't watch basketball. Kupchak is a terrible GM. If you were mad about the Hornets off season go check out the contracts LA gave out. My god it was bad.

And many think that is more based on the directives of Jim Buss than what MK wanted. And maybe he WOULD be an abject failure, but it really can't be any worse than what Cho has done. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, MountainHeel66 said:

And many think that is more based on the directives of Jim Buss than what MK wanted. And maybe he WOULD be an abject failure, but it really can't be any worse than what Cho has done. 

Go back to the Kobe and Shaq days. Kupchak is a huge reason Kobe never won more titles. Only good move he ever made was Gasol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://www.yahoo.com/sports/article/versatile-2nd-db-named-panthers-154026075.html Smith-Wade's ability to play corner, nickel and safety makes him valuable to a young defense trying to rebuild after finishing last in the NFL a year ago. "Chau took advantage of an opportunity,'' coach Dave Canales said. "He made tackles. He had an opportunity on an interception, and he made it.'' Our defense has got to come alive for us to have a chance of winning our Division!
    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
×
×
  • Create New...