The three players selected right after Ealy

[GoobyPls]

30 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Horrifically bad. See, this is another of your tactics. You overstate something to make your point sound better. Clausen was a horror show. Compared to that. Ealy was a mild fright.

 

C'mon Goob. Just because someone questions your opinion, does not mean they took offense with it. That's a bit melodramatic wouldn't you say?

 

And yes. Being the White Knight is an honor. You may wish to brush up on your Literature.

 

So me questioning your opinion means, in your eyes, I am moaning? lol  Like the wife. You have a unique way of interpreting things.

 

 

Here comes your agenda again, trying to change the topic to Clausen under a completely different regime to make light of this horrific choice. Taking into account all the circumstances I stated earlier Ealy was worse.

You made a giant sorrow filled soliloquy about me and Gettleman and now you are trying to sound like your playing both sides LOL

[Toomers]

4 hours ago, GoobyPls said:

My comment had nothing to do with Ealy as a prospect, its a fact Sam was a better college player.

Yeah you could of addressed in 2015. Its not a video game but did we or did we not just double dip at DT the year before? Also Johnson wasn't going anywhere.

 

  Oh really.....the post below that that started all this is all about Ealy's draft position, and Sam's alleged effect on it. And much like all your other "facts", it is just an opinion based on nothing more than supporting your agenda. Want me to post your "facts" from the other thread. Because every time you post some of your "facts", I think that post of yours will say all anyone will ever need to know about your credibility.

19 hours ago, GoobyPls said:

Not is not. 2015 playoff form really? A 3 game sample? Jesus Christ can you reach any harder. What are your thoughts on Deion Branch and Dexter Jackson? Lol

 

Ealy has never been worth a second, he rode Micheal Sam coattails at Mizzou 

 

[GoobyPls]

25 minutes ago, Toomers said:

  Oh really.....the post below that that started all this is all about Ealy's draft position, and Sam's alleged effect on it. And much like all your other "facts", it is just an opinion based on nothing more than supporting your agenda. Want me to post your "facts" from the other thread. Because every time you post some of your "facts", I think that post of yours will say all anyone will ever need to know about your credibility.

And my statement holds nothing but truth. He wasn't worth a second (I was right) and he did ride Sams coattail in college.

Keep reposting my facts I like them. Unlike you whose back tracking about the hindsight comment, I don't back down.

[Toomers]

11 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

And my statement holds nothing but truth. He wasn't worth a second (I was right) and he did ride Sams coattail in college.

Keep reposting my facts I like them. Unlike you whose back tracking about the hindsight comment, I don't back down.

   Yes. It's a "fact" because you watched a game on YouTube. A whole game. Yet no one but you thinks this. Find me anyone who has ever watched both play in college that agrees. Because I've had people come on here and state exactly what I have. Yet, as always, your "facts" seem to just be your opinion backed by nothing or no one. 

[GoobyPls]

5 minutes ago, Toomers said:

   Yes. It's a "fact" because you watched a game on YouTube. A whole game. Yet no one but you thinks this. Find me anyone who has ever watched both play in college that agrees. Because I've had people come on here and state exactly what I have. Yet, as always, your "facts" seem to just be your opinion backed by nothing or no one. 

Again you don't know the difference between college and the pros. Dwayne Jarrett was a better college receiver than Odell Beckham. The Golden Calf of Bristol was better than Aaron Rodgers. ext ext. 

 

[Toomers]

11 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

Again you don't know the difference between college and the pros. Dwayne Jarrett was a better college receiver than Odell Beckham. The Golden Calf of Bristol was better than Aaron Rodgers. ext ext. 

 

  And none of that means that Michael Sam "carried" Ealy at MIZZOU. That's your opinion. Backed by nothing. It's my opinion that he didn't. Backed up by anyone who watched them play. Like scouts, fans of the team, and myself( who actually watched the games at the time). As we've seen, you and "facts" don't seem to meet up too often. 

[GoobyPls]

18 minutes ago, Toomers said:

  And none of that means that Michael Sam "carried" Ealy at MIZZOU. That's your opinion. Backed by nothing. It's my opinion that he didn't. Backed up by anyone who watched them play. Like scouts, fans of the team, and myself( who actually watched the games at the time). As we've seen, you and "facts" don't seem to meet up too often. 

Fans, the committee, the reporters The AP press all seem to have no problem with voting Sam the best defender in the Sec. but of course some idiot with a point to prove knows more than everyone else. I'm sure they watched zero college football 

[Toomers]

31 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

Fans, the committee, the reporters The AP press all seem to have no problem with voting Sam the best defender in the Sec. but of course some idiot with a point to prove knows more than everyone else. I'm sure they watched zero college football 

  Find me any fans of Mizzou who thought he was better.

   Who is the committee?

  Yes, sports writers and SIDs who see maybe one game a week besides the one their covering, or scouts who watch every snap of every game. Those same writers and coaches(SIDs) also named Clowney All SEC that year, and he had 3 sacks and pretty much took the season off. That's how much credibility those guys have.

   And the best part which you have ignored since I first posted it. 80% of Sam's sacks were against Ark St, Vandy, and hobbled FL OL. If he was so good, how could he only get 2 sacks in the other 11 games? 

  

[Cat]

The point is it's another draft failure by Gettlemen.

[GoobyPls]

11 minutes ago, Toomers said:

  Find me any fans of Mizzou who thought he was better.

   Who is the committee?

  Yes, sports writers and SIDs who see maybe one game a week besides the one their covering, or scouts who watch every snap of every game. Those same writers and coaches(SIDs) also named Clowney All SEC that year, and he had 3 sacks and pretty much took the season off. That's how much credibility those guys have.

   And the best part which you have ignored since I first posted it. 80% of Sam's sacks were against Ark St, Vandy, and hobbled FL OL. If he was so good, how could he only get 2 sacks in the other 11 games? 

  

Yeah I'm gonna go to the university of Missouri to find you a fan. Smart plan you have there

 

You just outed yourself as a boxscore watcher. Clowney even with his low sack total was still reeking havoc. You do know Ealy main production came against the sec bottom feeders right? UK and Vandy. He also had a sack against Ark st and that same UF you keep bringing up. Lol talk about complete backfire 

[Toomers]

16 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

Yeah I'm gonna go to the university of Missouri to find you a fan. Smart plan you have there

 

You just outed yourself as a boxscore watcher. Clowney even with his low sack total was still reeking havoc. You do know Ealy main production came against the sec bottom feeders right? UK and Vandy. He also had a sack against Ark st and that same UF you keep bringing up. Lol talk about complete backfire 

    How about Auburn, where he single handily kept his team in the game in the first half. Or OK ST where he dominated the bowl game. Were those top 10 teams good enough? And just find any human with a shred of credibility that will support your statement. 

   Clowney did not wreak havoc, and certainly didn't belong anywhere near an All SEC team that year. I never seen a box score of Clowney's. That's your thing. I watched. I saw what most saw. I don't blame him. I wouldn't have even played. But that's another issue for another time.  

[GoobyPls]

1 hour ago, Toomers said:

    How about Auburn, where he single handily kept his team in the game in the first half. Or OK ST where he dominated the bowl game. Were those top 10 teams good enough? And just find any human with a shred of credibility that will support your statement. 

   Clowney did not wreak havoc, and certainly didn't belong anywhere near an All SEC team that year. I never seen a box score of Clowney's. That's your thing. I watched. I saw what most saw. I don't blame him. I wouldn't have even played. But that's another issue for another time.  

So now you want to bring up other games but not Georgia? Aww the picking and choosing is hilarious 

 

Im pretty sure you don't watch any football, Clowney was a one man wrecking crew.