Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fidelity vs Vanguard vs Schwab vs...


KSpan

Recommended Posts

Long story short is that I have a couple of retirement accounts that need to be rolled together and I'm currently undergoing 'paralysis of the analysis' - a number of solid options and no clear differentiation for my admittedly-basic situation.

I'm not looking for anything fancy with these investments - mutual funds and ETFs with a buy-and-hold outlook. At this point I feel like Fidelity is the direction i want to go; any clear reason not to? I like their platform better than Vanguard and the fees have pulled very close, if not cheaper at Fidelity in some cases. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used to work for Vanguard here in Charlotte, so I can only speak to them.  They really do have the lowest overall fees - not just with the funds themselves, but no account management fees either if you sign up for e-delivery.  They do a good job at not nickel and diming people with hidden fees.  But in a sense you get what you pay for.  Vanguard's website and app are outdated, but if you're not going to be doing much trading that doesn't really matter.  

If you call customer service you can expect a VERY long wait.  20 minutes is considered a short wait honestly.  Everyone who works there is miserable and processing simple paperwork can sometimes take months with how backed up everything is.

I left Vanguard a few months ago, but still have my money invested there.  Vanguard is known for the buy and hold strategy - just leave your money in and let it do its thing, so if that's your philosophy they'll be a good fit.  I would skip out on their advice service.  It only costs 0.3%, but it's just a glammed up robo advisor, it doesn't do anything you can't do on your own.

Happy to answer any specific questions you have about Vanguard!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would advise you to not be so fast to move into an investment such as mutual funds or etf s.  They all cost you money and it has been proven again and again that by and large they do NOT outperform the general stock market indexes.  Personally I invest in dividend paying companies which have been consistently been paying good dividends over a long period of time.  Companies such as Johnson and Johnson, Exxon, PepsiCo, and etc.  I would also be very leery to invest any new money at this time in any funds or stocks - valuations are very high and we are overdue for a large pull back.  What will precipitate it, could happen at any time given the state of the world and our current administration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People were also terrified to invest in 2010 and its pretty much done nothing but go up since then.  No one knows when a crash will come. This bull market could go on for 5 more years or could end tomorrow, you can't time the market. Just put it in and don't panic when there's a downturn. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Read this page about the Schiller P/E ratio, take a look at it 's current number of 28 and tell me it is a good time to invest in the stock market.  If you are dollar cost averaging a set amount of money every month for years, maybe.  If,  like the op suggests you want to dump a wad of cash ( roll over) into an investment today, it is my opinion that you are making a big mistake.  If I were you I would open an account  in an insured money market type vehicle and dollar cost average it into the market over time -  don't be fooled into believing that the market is " different this time " and what goes up is going to keep doing so.  It is not and we are only one major crisis away from a free fall.

 

http://www.gurufocus.com/shiller-PE.php

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ehh, new front office has 2 drafts under their belt -- Salaun draft class was really a horrible class in general, but Salaun has started to show some of his potential and KJ Simpson not bad for a 2nd round pick. This past draft clearly looks like it was knocked out of the fuging park obviously with Kon but also Sion and Kalk already contributing in somewhat big roles for late round picks. And McNeeley has shown potential and lit it up in summer league, seems to be doing well in the G league for a young guy too.      As for this season I think a very realistic goal and outcome of the regular season is sneaking up into a 7 or 8 seed and then winning 1 of 2 play-in games to make the real playoffs. Probably get cooked in round 1 but that playoff experience and establishing that expectation of winning is critical to the development of our young core. 
    • Sound write-up MHS, as always.  Agree that the smart move that forward thinking franchises make would be drafting a tackle early, if not for sure in R1, depending on who's there. Based on early predictions we're choosing between Fano and Proctor. No brainer here...Fano all day. Proctor does not move the needle for me. In my mind, Icky has less future here than Brooks does. I love Icky, but he has been average as a top-10 pick, one good year where you saw the potential...and that was this year. He's built like a RT and his strengths are there, but he's always played left. I also feel like part of what has held him back from being elite, was his work ethic. He was known for it coming out, but feel like he fell right at home in Carolina and maybe didn't push himself as hard as he needed to. Throw in a major crucial injury that will take time to recover and a historical low return rate to current form, and the outlook is not great. Fano can play both sides and we need to also plan for Moton's departure. Either way, delaying drafting a tackle early this year will hurt us down the line. Our current OL is overpriced and needs to start adding draftees to start balancing out the inevitable changes coming in the next 2-3 years.  As others have said, maybe Icky can replace Hunt or Lewis in a couple years when he's fully recovered....IDK. Also not a guarantee, but then you have to figure out his contract and it becomes even more clouded.
    • It's past time to just eliminate it in terms of an event. Just do the voting, name the roster, and move on. When you get down to 6th and 7th alternates it's just absurd. It doesn't mean anything.
×
×
  • Create New...