Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL.com Chad Reuter's 6-round mock


tiger7_88

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

You must understand we can't plug every hole. Gman does work that way. He doesn't go down a list of needs and check off every need. It's BPA, if a C is graded higher than a DE, he will take a the C even though its not an immediate need.

I understand that completely but in this mock draft in some rounds the players that they have us picking probably won't be bpa. Also have us taking 2 DE and a DT. Highly doubt that happens. 1 DE and 1 DT probably and some unfa. The first pick is fine but a WR will probably be picked in the 2nd round. If they don't trade back into the first. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Byrdman4real said:

I understand that completely but in this mock draft in some rounds the players that they have us picking probably won't be bpa. Also have us taking 2 DE and a DT. Highly doubt that happens. 1 DE and 1 DT probably and some unfa. The first pick is fine but a WR will probably be picked in the 2nd round. If they don't trade back into the first. 

gotcha! ...........playboy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Been doing drafts on fanspeak with ontheclock premium and every time I try to get the same two people in the second round I hope that we have both available when it's time for us to pick

Zay Jones and Chris Wormley would add so much to both sides of the ball for us if we could grab both in the second life for me as a panther fan would be complete


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/16/2017 at 11:13 AM, tiger7_88 said:

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000799773/article/chad-reuter-6round-mock-draft-browns-take-trubisky-no-1

2 QBs taken in the top 7 and a worst-case scenario (so to speak... Garrett, Thomas, Fournette, Howard, and Adams taken + the 2 QBs).

1. Christian McCaffrey, RB, Stanford

2. Charles Harris, DE, Missouri

2. Julien Davenport, OT, Bucknell

3. Cooper Kupp, WR, E. Washington

4. Brian Allen, CB, Utah

5. Nazair Jones, DT, UNC

6. Keionta Davis, DE, Chattanooga

Now the first 4 picks I'd be OK with.  Don't know enough about the final 3 picks to make a judgement.

 

I agree with you, so I've taken the liberty of re-drafting the final 3 rounds based on who was left when we pick. 

4. pick 115; Jordan Leggett TE, Clemson (needs his a$$ kicked to reach potential, but has all the tools to be good)

5. pick 152; Sam Rogers FB, VT (Igo's man crush and a frikkin beast)

6. pick 192; Ryan Glaskow DT, Mich (performed well at a big school, tough, motivated guy)

Edit: I didn't actually look at who was left when we picked rounds 2 & 3, I'm just commenting that "I'd be OK" with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am trying to remember when I EVER said reach for need. My thing if someone falls you jump, if you can trade back a few slots and get help at the right value and pick up some ammo to move up from 51 which I think is outside the money zone, then you do that.   Take a WR later. Plenty of capable WRs have come from the 3rd round. Though this year I would go for C there if there was a reasonable choice. Take a TE if you must. I see more reason to take WR than TE. I think you give guys drafted two years ago and last year a chance to develop before cancelling them.    I think it is kind of unrealistic to throw everything all in on offense in hopes of going deep in the playoffs after an 8-10 year, even if it did have some nice bright spots in it.    And outside of this argument but relevant to it, I am bothered by Canales and Morgan and their apparent posture that we have arrived and are now in the big boy club. I don’t know where that comes from. They are out there talking like they are winners at 8-10. Backing into the playoffs in a real convoluted tie breaker scenario. They had some good games, yes. But the big feather n the cap, the LA Rams matchups, did you see what the Rams did? They didn’t fire the coaches but they fired their defensive backs. Bryce beat them yes, and it was pretty, but it was kind of like the Bucs and Mike Evans picking on our decimated secondary in 2022. Someone (Wilks) went down for allowing that to happen and they went down in LA too.  Wr aren’t as good as a whole lot of homers think we are. Shore up the trenches.    I think too many fans buy into it because they are so starved for anything that looks like a winner. 
    • How exactly does one win OROY "by default"? Wouldn't winning the award mean that of the two, McMillon stayed strong the entire year while the other guy didn't and fizzled out? That's like saying Secretariat only won by default because the other horse stopped moving midway through the race. Absolutely zero logic in that statement, which makes me very glad that I've never really paid much attention to Walterfoozball.
    • I agree, teams in the past have fired the HC in order to retain a coach on staff...hell it happened to Mcderp this year, rams in the past and Im missing another.  The fall off for the Panthers team defense was huge once Mcderp leftd and Ron could not fix it even when he named himself DC. 
×
×
  • Create New...