Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Man-genius!?!


DelhommesTheMan

Recommended Posts

So the Browns are struggling offensively right now, so what does there coach do. He starts the backup QB for a game to try and salvage the season. If it doesnt work than im sure he goes back to Quinn, takes the first year lumps and see's what he's got for next season. Thats what most of you here are asking for..which is essentially giving up on the year is it not? Too start Moore only to have him be terrible will just lead us back to Jake and a losing season with nothing too prove. Than again Moore could blow up, and than it would be interesting. The situation is a bit opposite as they were starting there future while we are finishing up our soon to be past QB.

Sitting Jake will mean the season is over and that Fox has given up, until we are mathematically done, i dont see him doing that...But than again he's no Mangenius ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a big Delhomme fan, unrepentantly so. And I am waffling between whether benching him would be better or worse for the team.

I worry that he's got a case of the yips, and that can end a quarterback's career, fast.

(From Wikipedia: Yips, or The yips is an expression describing an apparently baseless sudden loss of ability in one of a number of different sports. Professional or leading amateur sportsmen affected by the Yips sometimes recover their ability, sometimes compensate by changing technique, or may be forced to abandon their sport at the highest level.)

Do we keep him in and let him continue working through it (there's been some signs that he is past it, even if the team isn't), or bench him and give Moore a shot?

If Jake can get his game back together, we know that he has the leadership skills to pull the team with him.He's shown it many times in the past, but it greatly depends on his confidence in himself and his desire to win.

On the other hand, traditional wisdom says that the finite number of games each season in the NFL (16 compared to over a hundred in some other sports) means each game is vital. If the game is on the line, conventional wisdom says you bench the quarterback and move to the back-up. Moore has been on the team long enough to hopefully perform well, and he does have some in game experience. So, he does deserve a shot.

But if he can't make it, and statistically there's every chance that he isn't up to caliber (a good quarterback at the professional level is very, very rare), then we've lost that and potentially devastated a good quarterback who might be on the road to recovery.

It's a devil of a choice. I'd prefer to see Jake under center when we play the Redskins in hope that the bye week gives him the time he needs to get it worked out. But a case could be made that they tell him, we want you to be on the sidelines for that one game, soaking it in.

But heck, I just don't know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We’re in a pickle. My best hope is we protect him and can run the ball vs most Ds and the WRs are healthy so he has every chance to not look like what he looked like in too many games last year.   
    • I'm really not stressing about upgrading from Bryce. I'm frustrated with our inability (or refusal) to recognize overall bad QB performance and failure to seriously address the issue. QB is the most impactful position on the field, and we're not only settling for what we've been given to this point, but we've rewarded it with a fully guaranteed 5th year extension for a player that's never played 2 NFL franchise QB quality games back to back in 3 seasons. I can't understand how that's ok from a coach's or GM's viewpoint. Successful franchises don't do things like this. It just doesn't make sense.  We do not have a top half of the league QB right now. Since we don't have that player, we should be looking for him. Pickett isn't it. Grier isn't it. Bryce hasn't proven he is yet. Until you have that sure fire franchise QB, you keep looking. You're not consistently making the playoffs, a deep run, or a SB appearance without one.  What's the worst that could happen? We end up with 2 potential number 1 QBs? How horrible. 
    • Easy to understand Pickett, if this is anywhere close to on point. Canales wants to get as close to Bryce as he can- get the pace and timing in the throws as close a he can to Bryce. So the other players don’t have to adjust so much, to a new guy.       If Cam was the 1, he would look for a rocket arm.  But Bryce is the 1. Look for limited in the same way.  Low velocity, plenty of air under it, feels just like home when Picket comes in. And you have the guys on the second team not having such a radical adjustment (if they have to play) like with Dalton to Bryce.    Enter Grier. I guess we will collect those types.   
×
×
  • Create New...