Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers First Padded Practice 7/28 Thread - Training Camp Day 3 - Tweets, Thoughts, Etc.


Saca312

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, sanjay_rajput said:

You would still have 3 LBs on the field only his alignment would be just different . The beauty of having 3 top notch LBs is you can stay in base and not tip off the offense for audible when they see a mismatch. 

What could possibly happen is that we take a safety out and put in Captain 

Having three linebackers on the field does not mean that you are playing in a 4-3 defensive set. A nickel set, when the 3rd linebacker acts as a DB, is still nickel. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dldove77 said:

Ok, Funchess had less yards and the same amount of TDs in his first two seasons as Benjamin did in his rookie year. Is that a objective stat? 

I'm only calling it like I see it. You can continue to write snarky comments, if you like. Funchess underwhelms me. That's my subjective opinion. 

So because Funchess, a player with only 1 year of college experience at his position with a QB that should've been playing receiver, hasn't been as productive as Benjamin means we should cut him? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

Having three linebackers on the field does not mean that you are playing in a 4-3 defensive set. A nickel set, when the 3rd linebacker acts as a DB, is still nickel. 

Nickel is when you replace a LB to have 5 defensive backs on the field instead of 4

Having 3 LBs with different alignment just means you have versatile player that can cover which eliminates the need to bring in the 5th defensive back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bozarden said:

Maybe if he was a 5 year vet.

A rookie who altough tremendously is a very raw product at wide receiver most definitely needs the reps. Missing most of OTA's and training camp might set him back weeks when we get to real games... I am crossing my fingers that he gets healthy ASAP

Agreed, especially since he is essentially changing positions as well. It's a lot more important to keep him healthy. Still a lot of time between now and week 1 though and Shep is looking pretty darned good (disclaimer: in practice) so I'm no where near panic mode yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

So because Funchess, a player with only 1 year of college experience at his position with a QB that should've been playing receiver, hasn't been as productive as Benjamin means we should cut him? 

I don't know, do you want to cut him? I never mentioned cutting him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nobody is giving up a 4th rounder for a backup QB And anyone who needs a starter badly enough to where Bryce would then be their starter, is such a bad team that they're not giving up a pick likely to be about pick 105ish overall, instead of just dealing with a bad QB situation for a season and then drafting one in a loaded QB draft next year. I'm looking through all the teams right now and can't think of a single one that would be willing to part with anything better than a 6th rounder. Barring injuries (and excluding the Panthers), there look to be 10 teams who don't know with 100% certainty who their starting QB will be in 2027... Dolphins, Jets, Browns, Steelers, Vikings, Colts, Saints, Falcons, Cardinals, and Rams. Of those 10...  The Rams know it will be Stafford or Simpson.  The Saints more than likely will be sticking with Shough unless he takes a huge step backwards.  So neither are giving up any draft picks for Bryce right now, just wouldn't make sense for either. Down to 8 Given their current QB situation of having multiple QBs they already need to evaluate between this year, the Browns (Shedeur/Watson), Vikings (Kyler/JJ), Colts (Jones/Richardson/Leonard), and Falcons (Penix/Tua), wouldn't be giving up a 4th (or maybe any pick) to bring in another QB to muddy the waters even more. Down to 4 Dolphins just signed Willis and wouldn't want to bring in another small Alabama QB who has struggled after just dumping Tua instead of just rolling with Ewers as the backup.   That then leaves the Steelers, Cardinals, and Jets left as it's clear none of them have any idea who their 2027 could be as of right now.  But the Steelers would for sure rather just see what one of the 2 QB's they drafted in the last 2 drafts could become than give up a mid round pick for Bryce.  Same goes for the Cardinals in taking Beck this past weekend. The Jets would be the most likely team to even consider taking him on, but I think it seems very apparent right now given them rolling with Geno and now talk of bringing in Wilson to be his backup, they're punting on QB this year to draft someone next year, so why give up even a mid round pick for Bryce?
    • Honestly I am not sure Pickett couldn’t step in for him. But I don’t see a clear easy upgrade and we are not KC with Alex Smith we are a team that hadn’t done poo for almost ten years and just made the playoffs. And looked good in the game. That stadium atmosphere on that day…. you know Tepper ate that poo up. Not one drink has been thrown in a while.  You had better make sure if you replaced him after that that you had a sure fire upgrade. 
    • Makes sense. If Bryce is ass this year, we are probably drafting our new QB next draft and sitting him behind Bryce for a year
×
×
  • Create New...