Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fascinating Article on Kicking - We Were 23rd In The League In FGs Converted Relative to Expected Points...


TylerDurden

Recommended Posts

...or something like that LOL.

http://settingedge.com/40pluskicks

Quote

...

The data is clear: Field goal kicking is harder the further out you go. That’s not shocking. What that does mean is that a 50-yard field goal, with a success percentage of 56.67%, shouldn’t be treated the same as a field goal under 20 yards, with a success percentage of 100.00%. Disregarding the traditional “field goal percentage” numbers and moving toward a model that measures performance relative to “expected” numbers gives us a better look at which field goal percentages were simply just over inflated by low-difficulty attempts.

Show 102550100 entries
Search:
Team Total <40 40+
Pittsburgh Steelers -1.26 -2.92 1.66
Green Bay Packers -1.27 -1.59 0.32
Carolina Panthers -2.47 -2.81 0.34
Washington Redskins -4.50 -1.18 -3.32
Los Angeles Chargers -4.87 1.27 -6.14
Cleveland Browns -5.55 2.41 -7.96
Chicago Bears -5.74 -3.12 -2.62
Arizona Cardinals -5.83 -3.59 -2.24
Cincinnati Bengals -7.59 0.93 -8.52
Buffalo Bills -7.69 2.13 -9.82
Showing 21 to 30 of 32 entries

Above are the numbers on NFL kicking games in 2016. Any positive number is earned points above expectations. Any negative number is lost points below expectations. The reason for the split of field goals of 40 yards or more and 39 yards or less is that when you look at the execution numbers, that is where you see by far the most variation league-wide.

 

...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...