Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Justice League


Cary Kollins

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Porn Shop Clerk said:

We've had enough Batman films. The problem with Flash, Cyborg, Aquaman is that they couldn't carry a solo film without Justice League first, I think.

Flash definitely could, Idk about the other two though.

 

they made captain America and Thor solo films before avengers and that worked. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Captain America is more widely known, imo, and Thor is a bigger draw than Aquaman for sure.  He might be on the level with Flash. I prefer DC over Marvel, I'm just thinking in terms of popularity and name recognition. Also the two Hulk films. But Hulk is probably more popular than Cap. They didn't do any prior standalone films before X-Men, proof that it can be done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Porn Shop Clerk said:

 Captain America is more widely known, imo, and Thor is a bigger draw than Aquaman for sure.  He might be on the level with Flash. I prefer DC over Marvel, I'm just thinking in terms of popularity and name recognition. Also the two Hulk films. But Hulk is probably more popular than Cap. They didn't do any prior standalone films before X-Men, proof that it can be done.

The flash definitely has more name recognition and popularity than aquaman or cyborg. 

 

The CW tv show has made flash a huge name and definitely could have had a stand alone film before JL and done well. 

 

Cap and thor weren’t on same level respectively. Ant man, gotg, Thor, are proof that the general audiences are capable of showing out to lesser known comic book movies and them doing well. 

 

Cyborg also has the the added effect of having been seen by millions of kids-young adults from Teen titans for years. 

Aquaman has always been a joke character for years

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Porn Shop Clerk said:

Ant Man is still an afterthought, and came after the first Avengers film, right? He's not even remarkable enough to make fun of like Aqauaman.

Marvel studios original plan was to have ant man as the first movie from their studio instead of iron man. 

Even if t came after the avengers having an obscure character like ant man in an origin movie do well is proof enough to me The flash could do a stand alone and be fine. Especially with the success of the tv show

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing with the movies is that it's not the characters, it's the actors and story.  Comic readers care about the characters, but non-comic readers just want a superhero movie that's fun, exciting, and a hero that's badass.  As long as the movie explains who they are and why we should care about them, they will be fine.  And the MCU has mastered all of that, which is why even their more obscure characters are successful.  

I think Jason Mamoa could absolutely pull that off as Aquaman as long as the story is solid.  He can carry off the humor with ease, but can kick ass with the best of them.  I'm actually really looking forward to seeing that. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So let me ask you this, and this is assuming you watched the first 2 games of the season. The falcons game was a back and forth between to 2 bad teams until bryce throws 2 crucial picks to help atlanta pull away. The second game was a sloppy game where the defense scored and our offense did absolutely nothing till the 4th quarter, bryce even fumbles and saints return for a TD. If Dalton starts both of those games is the outcome and playout still the same for both games?
    • sure.  I acknowledge we had a rookie making rookie mistakes.  You fail to acknowledge a pushing 40 Dalton however paired up in this trainwreck wasn't going to yield significantly better results. good results.   And Dalton didn't even win his game vs a wrecked Seattle D.  Andy Dalton couldn't even find a way for his team to beat the Carolina freaking Panthers in 2022.  A team with an interim HC, that couldn't score, playing like it was 1970.   And Andy Dalton had REAL weapons on the field at his disposal.   All Dalton had to do was score more than 10 points.  He couldn't pull that off.    I probably got as little faith in Bryce as anyone here.   But I'm not willing to go this Andy Dalton route.  Maybe he wins 4ish here.  But he wasn't doing much here.  Dalton isn't Cincy Dalton.  
    • What do you think really happens here?  Do you think that Seattle loss with half a secondary is a realistic game for Dalton to consistently have?  Do you expect 40 year old Dalton to throw it 60 times and rack up 361 yards while constantly getting hit to work against other teams?  If we played him all year do you think he would rack up 6,137 yards 34 TDs and 0 INTs on over a thousand attempts?  That games wasn't a great game.  We were trailing all game and he threw it against a terrible secondary 60 times averaging 6.6 yards an attempt.  He had one "deep" pass to Chark (wide ass open) for 27 yards who ran another 20 for a TD.  That's not happening against other teams.  I would be surprised if Dalton made it two more games taking those kinds of hits and probably losing both of those games.  Our OL sucked, Our coaches sucked, and our weapons sucked.  Remember Rhule beat Andy Dalton and his Saints offense (which has a better OL and better weapons) just the prior year.  Yeah Matt Rhule...  Darnold put up 43 yards and 2 INTs and Dalton STILL couldn't beat him.  That's embarrassing.
×
×
  • Create New...