Worley.... Not a good game today.

[unicar15]

7 hours ago, ichigo1057 said:

I think the main reason for the focus of his performance is that Worley is the only one complaining and whining whenever we give somebody besides him more playing time. I mean shoot, when he was failing and Seymour was doing loads better Worley wasn't talking about winning, instead he was complaining that he didn't get more playing time. If you want to complain about not getting playing time, when you get it, you had better play a heck of a lot better than what he has shown so far.

I also like Seymour better. I think the problem is he isn’t as physical at LOS as Worley. So they are sacrificing some coverage for run stopping ability. I’m about ready to throw that out and just let Seymour have the snaps. The other issue may be that they want to keep Worley engaged so that if he’s needed he doesn’t pull a Benjamin and just get completely disinterested. 

[Carolina Cajun]

I thought Seymour played pretty good too, no clue why Worley continues to get snaps, especially when he undermined the staff by publicly complaining about playing time.

[JawnyBlaze]

7 hours ago, stbugs said:

Seymour is OK, but he gave up the last passing TD as well. I am not sure he is any better. I am not saying that Worley is good or even better, just that Seymour is not the answer. When I see a post like this that Seymour wasn't burnt, yet he gave up an easy TD. He's been burned before as well.

The answer isn't on the current active roster.

Well I did say he had some balls caught on him. He certainly isn’t the answer for us st CB2, but I do think he’s better than Worley.