Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Adam Schefter from ESPN "suggests" these trades


pstall

Recommended Posts

Again, nobody will trade for a guy taking 16 million home for one season, only too let him hit FA next year. The Panthers also dont think they are out of it with 2 gimme games on the horizon in Tampa and Buffalo bringing them up to 3-3. Peppers is part of our defense, and a big part. Whether he produces or not, he is still gameplanned for by the opposition because he could at any given moment explode, he has the talent, just not the fire. Hence the reason Cooley got ZERO catches last week was they brought him up to the line to help with Peppers once Samuels went out...

We dont have anyone that can replace Pep, at this point so this is a stupid trade, a first round pick next year for Peppers does nothing but admit we should have let him walk and kept our first rounder and signed some depth with the extra cash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the Falcons hadn't thrashed the niners in their own house this would make a lot more sense. A win or even a close loss against a good falcon team would have shown that the niners are a true contender this year and would encourage a move like this.

Sinking that much money in a player only makes sense if it pushes you over the edge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not saying they will happen but just a suggestion for money etc.

TO from the Bills to whoever but the next one got my attention.

Peppers to San Fran. For a#1 which is what they gave up anyway.

hmm

I just don't get why anyone would (except for Hurney) pay Peppers a million a game this year, and give up a valuable #1 pick as well to get him.

He'll be walking the street next spring anyway and will be had for half that price and no compensation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No matter what we still need a QB2 with potential to be a QB1. Keep throwing QBs at the wall until we find someone who sticks.
    • Lot of different agendas dictating opinions.  I don’t think it was the best use of money with Hunt, specifically, but the concept of OL, I am a fan. I didn’t complain a ton because I am a believer in winning up front, on both sides of the ball. I’d rather have stout fronts than fancy WRs. I have complained some about Hunt not being worth his deal, after seeing him get pushed around in a game or two. It’s no crusade. And have complained in the context of shorting the defense.   They have leveled out the FA imbalance with the dual big signings this offseason, and it has always been the draft picks I am most protective of. Anyway The picks are the real imbalance. If you did a trade chart value of the picks we directly gave up for Bryce, and added the support picks invested for skill players, and put that on one side… then put the little 3 3rd rounders and a 2nd that the defense got over three years on the other it would be hugely out of balance. I just want the balance restored. Defense is still owed.    
    • I'm one of the ones that won't let it go because it didn't solve the problem. We didn't address the center position which was a huge mistake. We were in position to easily take 2 or the top IOL. Instead of drafting JPJ over XL or Frazier over Brooks, we relied on an oft injured guard to center conversion and lo and behold, it failed as predicted. XL looks like a 1 year college wonder and an injured Brooks hasn't even surpassed Eric Shelton.  Bryce was also benched for poor performance, so the issue that many claimed was solely bad oline play wasn't. It didn't fix him bailing out of tight pockets because of being unable to see the field or him refusing to work on his atrocious footwork. Then there's the $$$. Lewis got a good guard payday. Hunt got a tackle payday. Pay tackles, draft guards, if you can.  I have no issues addressing problems through FA. It was not addressing C at all that's been the issue and still has been. Ryan Kalil was the anchor of our offensive line. We had years of solid center play and it showed. Now we're still piecemealing the center position with an expensive oline and it's still a shitshow. Why? Because the player responsible for what happens on the line presnap has little to no experience doing it. We did acquire a FA center this year finally. We'll see how much that impacts the line.  Spending on a center, whether it be through draft or FA is not bad. It's not a position that can have anyone just thrown in with no drop off in performance. A great center lifts the play of the guards on each side.  I don't like how we've built the line because we've ignored the hinge pin that everyone counts on every play. And the reality of the situation is, it didn't solve the actual problems with Bryce because those have nothing to do with the oline. 
×
×
  • Create New...