Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

More from Panthers.com: Vernon Butler


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Agreed, and especially when it comes to defensive linemen.  With one or two exceptions, most of them don't really show their stuff until the second or third year.  

Hell, who would've thought that after putting up 1000 receiving yards as a rookie that Kelvin Benjamin wouldn't even play out his rookie contract in Carolina? We all thought we had a future perennial All-Pro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You're either mis-remembering or ignoring reality if you think that anyone of relevance had CMC as a 2nd round pick leading up to the draft. 

Most had him as a late first or early second round pick.  That's what I remember. 

Number 8 was simply too high. Many people had the Pats picking him until it became apparent that we were more than interested. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, frash.exe said:

lol ffs

hunter henry plays less than 60% of the snaps on a team splitting time with a barely functional antonio gates, but we should’ve drafted him and it wouldn’t have been a luxury pick even though olsen plays 93% of the snaps on our offense in 2016

@top dawg

@panthers55

 

This guy really doesn't know what he is talking about at all.

Imagine if he had played 90% of the snaps I guess he would have over 1,000 yds 

 

 

TE1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ace_Aladdin said:

Yes they did he was the top TE in the class, stop lying 

We're not talking about Hunter Henry,  who would have been an excellent pick, we're talking Christian McCaffrey.  

LG has made him out to be a consensus top 10 pick after the fact. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, ChibCU said:

There are some people in here arguing about luxury picks and trying to counter that by saying we should have drafted, by their own definition, a luxury pick. Amazing.

sanjay (ace aladdin)is either a truly world class idiot or a complete troll (or possibly a mixture of both), best to just ignore him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

No, they didn't. Go find it. I bet you won't find anything credible past about January or so.

I told you that this post-Combine thing doesn't  even really matter to scouts.  Believe it, or don't.  At this point it doesn't even matter.  McCaffrey was not the best value when we picked, and neither was Vernon Butler,  or Shaq Thompson. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I told you that this post-Combine thing doesn't  even really matter to scouts.  Believe it, or don't.  At this point it doesn't even matter.  McCaffrey was not the best value when we picked, and neither was Vernon Butler,  or Shaq Thompson. 

It might not matter to scouts, but the media certainly sings a much different tune on a lot of prospects post-Combine because that's their first chance to really get a good feel for what a lot of scouts think about prospects, not just the handful of contacts they have.

Very rarely does it work out that a guy is truly the "best value" at the position he's picked. That's the way it's always been and the way it'll always be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It might not matter to scouts, but the media certainly sings a much different tune on a lot of prospects post-Combine because that's their first chance to really get a good feel for what a lot of scouts think about prospects, not just the handful of contacts they have.

Very rarely does it work out that a guy is truly the "best value" at the position he's picked. That's the way it's always been and the way it'll always be. 

Bottom line is that basically everyone had Lattimore ranked ahead of McCaffrey, and there was plenty of justification for us to take him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In all honesty, he should probably get that checked out. It might be (Arnold Schwarzenegger voice) "a tuuumaaa" 
    • Ah yes, my bad. It's easy to forget those handful of games Frank coached. LOL 
    • I've seen the comp a few times, and I feel there is a lot to it. Our situation is a lot like Kansas City was pre-Mahomes (without the HOF HC) Whether you like them or not, D&D are building something here.  They had a strong draft.  The team is slowly coming together, developing some identity, and has some decent blue chip parts.  Brown, Horn, McMillan, and a good OL situation that we should keep fortifying every year.  It's not much yet, but growing.    Bryce is in that Alex Smith spot.  A top draft pick, has never been overly impressive, but you can win games when he's safe with the ball.  You're not winning because of him - maybe once in a blue moon.  From time to time he's shown the ability to orchestrate some plays and lead drives.  I just don't see anything that is like - "oh snap, yeah don't let him go, he's ours".  He'll make a solid/good throw every now and again, but man, it is a struggle a lot of the time to watch.  Some terrible performances to speak of, heck he's already been benched once during year 2.      He should in no way preclude you from flirting with what else is out there.  This is not a marriage.  If you're in position (or trade range) for a guy you REALLY like come draft day, you shoot your shot. If we are in the draft process, and suddenly realize QB3-4 is a guy we really like, that's when you make a modest jump from like 16 to 11 or something like that.  Just like the Bills did for Allen, like the Chiefs did for Mahomes.  This is nothing magical that plants this franchise savior title on them, this is not some stupid trade-- it's an easy trade up to get a guy you like w/a big ceiling.  It's all player dependent and coaching/development driven.  If we don't like a QB, by all means fortify the front-7, get an awesome OLB or ILB prospect.   But we're on year 3, you kind of know what you're getting at this point.  Mostly sub-200 yard performances, low YPA, bad technique, poor mechanics, some decent stuff sprinkled in, but some bad turnover heavy ones that kill the team's momentum.  Again, run with him if there's no complete disaster that happens the remainder of the season, but don't close the door on something better just because of the investment or debatable performances.     
×
×
  • Create New...