Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Obstructed View Seating

riverrat

By riverrat,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

riverrat Newbie

riverrat

Posted
Posted

I was hoping someone with experience could help give me an opinion on my tickets. I have never been to a game at Bank of America Stadium, and I had the opportunity to buy some tickets. Section 539 Row 1A Seats 14 and 15. These seats would be the second and third seat from the isle. I am assuming with this row being the front row, that the railing is what is causing the "Obstructed View", but I wanted to be sure I could still watch the game and not be completely blinded of one side of the field.

Trying to decide if I need to sell these tickets. Any help is appreciated.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
toldozer Grand Master

toldozer

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, riverrat said:

I was hoping someone with experience could help give me an opinion on my tickets. I have never been to a game at Bank of America Stadium, and I had the opportunity to buy some tickets. Section 539 Row 1A Seats 14 and 15. These seats would be the second and third seat from the isle. I am assuming with this row being the front row, that the railing is what is causing the "Obstructed View", but I wanted to be sure I could still watch the game and not be completely blinded of one side of the field.

Trying to decide if I need to sell these tickets. Any help is appreciated.  

 Sell them... to me,  it's the rail. We sit in row 1 in 543. The rail does bother some people,  we stand a lot so it doesnt bother us

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chiefzack Collaborator

Chiefzack

Posted
Posted
16 hours ago, riverrat said:

I was hoping someone with experience could help give me an opinion on my tickets. I have never been to a game at Bank of America Stadium, and I had the opportunity to buy some tickets. Section 539 Row 1A Seats 14 and 15. These seats would be the second and third seat from the isle. I am assuming with this row being the front row, that the railing is what is causing the "Obstructed View", but I wanted to be sure I could still watch the game and not be completely blinded of one side of the field.

Trying to decide if I need to sell these tickets. Any help is appreciated.  

I’ve actually called about it before. It’s people walking in front of you because, you will be sitting behind the ramp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • toldozer
      Canales is holding us back

      By toldozer · Posted

      I don't think Dave touches the defense. That might be a mark against him but definitely a huge red flag for evero. He refuses to run anything other than soft zone and when you don't get pressure that's an awful scheme
    • frankw
      This Bryce Guy (General BY Discussion)

      By frankw · Posted

      You don't have to convince me. I think not picking up the option should absolutely be firmly on the table but I just do not see Tepper and Morgan doing that for previously stated reasons. Therefore I'm not going to bother entertaining the notion. Just hoping we actually get real viable competition. If that doesn't happen at the minimum then my perception of that is complete and utter professional malpractice.
    • Bama Panther
      NFL admits the TMac catch should not have been overturned

      By Bama Panther · Posted

      It was absolutely a catch, and I can’t believe how many folks were stating, before the NFL’s apology, that the overturn was the right call.  The ultimate question in this case is this: can a player complete a catch with only one hand? Of course, we all know the answer to that question, and it is an emphatic “Yes.” T-Mac maintained complete control with one hand (believe it was the right) while the other came off when the ball hit the ground. The ball was in the same position in the one hand (watch T-Mac’s fingers in relation to the NFL shield on the ball) after touching the ground as it was when it first went to the ground. Going back to the question above, if one hand can establish control, then there was no need for the other to stay on the ball, so long as the ball doesn’t move in that one hand that stays on it   It blew my mind that they overturned this in the first place. This should not be a “We got it wrong on the replay because there wasn’t clear and convincing evidence.” This should have been, “That was absolutely a catch.”
×
×
  • Create New...