Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Wildcard Contenders; Big Week Folks


saX man

Recommended Posts

45 minutes ago, Iron Saint said:

Do you not understand how a tie works? It’s considered a half-win when doing win percentages. Let’s just say the Bears win the North with an 11-5 record. If the Packers and Vikings both have records of 10-5-1 and the Panthers have a record of 10-6, the Panthers and every other team vying for a Wild Card berth that have less than 11 wins are on the outside looking in, even if they’d have a tiebreaker over the Packers or Vikings such as a head-to-head win.

Is that clear enough to how a tie is beneficial or do I have to draw you a picture?

And that’s funny, I shouldn’t be here yet I’m apparently the only one that knows how a tie works? He probably enjoys us here to educate y’all so he doesn’t have to, LOLOLOL.

Nope still don't really see it. I wouldn't agree with u either way. I just wish u would take ur ass somewhere else. I don't care if I get banned. Maybe us fans need to take this site over so real fans came on here and not ones from other teams. This site has went to poo imo.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, steven8989 said:

Nope still don't really see it. I wouldn't agree with u either way. I just wish u would take ur ass somewhere else. I don't care if I get banned. Maybe us fans need to take this site over so real fans came on here and not ones from other teams. This site has went to poo imo.

LMAO, you wouldn’t agree with me because you don’t like the math? You’re just being silly now, pal. In my example above...

10 wins / 16 games = .625 win %

10.5 wins / 16 games = .656 win %

11 wins / 16 games = .688 win %

Funny how you mention this “site went to poo”, yet if you look at my profile, you’d see I’ve actually been a member here longer than you have. So if I’ve been here longer, funny how it magically “went to poo” after you joined?

 :tongue:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Iron Saint said:

LMAO, you wouldn’t agree with me because you don’t like the math? You’re just being silly now, pal. In my example above...

10 wins / 16 games = .625 win %

10.5 wins / 16 games = .656 win %

11 wins / 16 games = .688 win %

Funny how you mention this “site went to poo”, yet if you look at my profile, you’d see I’ve actually been a member here longer than you have. So if I’ve been here longer, funny how it magically “went to poo” after you joined?

 :tongue:

No it's poo that we actually let anyone like you comment. I'm just really tired of seeing y'all on here it's really annoying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, stbugs said:

LOL. The tie doesn't help them. Do you remember the game? It was a bullshit roughing the passer call on Clay Matthews that allowed Minnesota to tie (should have been a turnover and game over). I'm pretty sure that at 5-4, GB would be better off than 4-4-1. If a team doesn't have more wins than them with a tie, that team wouldn't have more wins than them with a win.

Minnesota got helped by the tie, because they should have lost and been 5-4 instead of 5-3-1.

Thank you. This dude really doesn't understand and we should get rid of these saints posters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, steven8989 said:

No it's poo that we actually let anyone like you comment. I'm just really tired of seeing y'all on here it's really annoying.

Awe, I’m sorry I’m contributing more to this forum than you are with your incessant crying. If my presence upsets you that bad, the focus groups meet on Tuesdays and Fridays for you to talk about your feelings.

 :tongue:

2 hours ago, stbugs said:

LOL. The tie doesn't help them. Do you remember the game? It was a bullshit roughing the passer call on Clay Matthews that allowed Minnesota to tie (should have been a turnover and game over). I'm pretty sure that at 5-4, GB would be better off than 4-4-1. If a team doesn't have more wins than them with a tie, that team wouldn't have more wins than them with a win.

Minnesota got helped by the tie, because they should have lost and been 5-4 instead of 5-3-1.

Minnesota certainly did get the most help out of tying because as you said, the would’ve lost if not. Same instance with you guys in 2014 were Mike Nugent missing the FG at the end of OT helped y’all more than the Bengals. 

However, having that tie got the Bengals (10-5-1) the #5 seed over the Ravens (10-6) who were forced into the #6 seed without needing to go to tiebreakers.

And that is my point, if two teams are vying for 1 playoff spot, the team with the tie is already at an advantage because if they have more or the same number of wins, they’re getting the nod even if they lost head-to-head to that same team without the tie. The team without the tie has to have more wins than the team with the tie to get that nod, period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With Freddie Slavin and Svech both playing at MVP levels, no one can touch us. Burns playing well.  Imagine if Jarvy and Aho get going…
    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
×
×
  • Create New...