Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Playing our youth is a win win for everyone.


Eazy-E

Recommended Posts

The starting line up for the rest of the season should look something like Kemba-Malik-Miles-Frank-Cody. All of these guys should be getting around 30 minutes a game. Graham and Bacon should be getting some second unit minutes. Guys like Parker, Marvin, and Batum should not be getting major minutes anymore.

At this point it would be hard to be much worse than we already are. Best case is our young guys step up and we miraculously make the playoffs. Worst case is we lose out and increase our lottery odds. It would be tanking without actually trying to tank and our young guys would get some much needed experience and maybe actually develop for once.

Try to re-sign Kemba and possibly Frank. Let Lamb walk, decline Parker's option, and do what ever you can to try and trade Biz, Batum. If we can't, buy them out. Pray Marv and MKg decline their player options but if they don't you can still try and trade them as they will be decent expiring contracts.

Roll with the same starting line up next season along with a new first rounder and maybe another if we are able to trade anyone.

We still need to try to win but we need to be doing it with our young draft picks not washed up vets on bloated contracts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, rhyslloyd said:

I'm with you here.  I definitely want to see what the young guys can do just so we know for sure, but I honestly don't think it's much.   

That is my point. They literally can’t be any worse. If we had played the starting lineup I mentioned all season, I bet our win total difference would only be around +/- 5 games. 

I mean our highest paid player who plays the second most minutes on the team doesn’t even average 10 points. His defensive impact and thing like that are not enough to offset his offensive shortcomings. So on the analytical side of things, if a player takes on the same role, plays worse defense but scores more points they even each other out. Basically we still suck. So why not play the young player with potential?

This goes back to not understanding why we dont just trade out first round picks every year. We draft these players and let them rot on the bench and never develop them and just consider them busts. It’s not like we’re a 50+ win team and our expensive vet players are actually any good. People are already calling Monk a bust. I can almost guarantee you if we drafted Mitchell he would be in the exact same position as Monk here. Instead he is thriving in Utah. Do you really think Clifford would have taken minutes from Batum and given them to a rookie last year?

This is why after we re-signed Batum I wanted to trade the pick we used on Monk to trade for Lou Williams because it was almost a guarantee who ever we drafted wouldn’t play their rookie year. So for a team always talking about trying to make the playoffs it made absolutely no sense.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Thelt said:

I suspect this will happen if we lose a few more games.  I do not think they are ready to give up on the playoffs yet.  Giving up too soon might have a big negative impact on our chances at retaining Kemba. 

Not making any moves at the trade deadline might come back to bite us. 

This isn’t giving up on the playoffs. It is our last hope at actually trying to make them. We already know we have a very slim chance at making it with guys like Batum and Marvin starting, but rolling with the young guys is a complete unknown. Regardless If we win out or lose every game, the outcome is a good thing for the future of this team. We either get a good draft pick or make the playoffs, all while our youth gets some much needed experience.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Eazy-E said:

That is my point. They literally can’t be any worse. If we had played the starting lineup I mentioned all season, I bet our win total difference would only be around +/- 5 games. 

I mean our highest paid player who plays the second most minutes on the team doesn’t even average 10 points. His defensive impact and thing like that are not enough to offset his offensive shortcomings. So on the analytical side of things, if a player takes on the same role, plays worse defense but scores more points they even each other out. Basically we still suck. So why not play the young player with potential?

This goes back to not understanding why we dont just trade out first round picks every year. We draft these players and let them rot on the bench and never develop them and just consider them busts. It’s not like we’re a 50+ win team and our expensive vet players are actually any good. People are already calling Monk a bust. I can almost guarantee you if we drafted Mitchell he would be in the exact same position as Monk here. Instead he is thriving in Utah. Do you really think Clifford would have taken minutes from Batum and given them to a rookie last year?

This is why after we re-signed Batum I wanted to trade the pick we used on Monk to trade for Lou Williams because it was almost a guarantee who ever we drafted wouldn’t play their rookie year. So for a team always talking about trying to make the playoffs it made absolutely no sense.

 

For sure.  Batum's deal is the real albatross here. 

I'll admit I'm one of the ones who hasn't been impressed at all by Monk (granted, in a small sample because he doesn't play), and Bridges might as well start throwing the ball at the rim one handed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, rhyslloyd said:

For sure.  Batum's deal is the real albatross here. 

I'll admit I'm one of the ones who hasn't been impressed at all by Monk (granted, in a small sample because he doesn't play), and Bridges might as well start throwing the ball at the rim one handed.

And the sad thing is the guys who are making 5 times as much as them with 10 years of experience aren’t really doing any better but they still get to play.

Why aren’t they getting benched for playing like poo every night?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Eazy-E said:

 They literally can’t be any worse.

Record wise, probably not. But it's probably a difference between losing games by 4 pts versus losing them by 16.

Right now they're only 1 game out of the playoffs. Barring an extended losing streak, I don't see them throwing in the towel anytime soon.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
16 minutes ago, My Goodness My Guinness said:

Please lord we better keep Bacon. Ever since he’s begun starting we’ve been winning

good replacement for Lamb, size at the SG/SF
room to improve
on the rookie contract

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • As much as I despise Billy B, his philosophy on QBs is how I would approach things if I were a GM. You always keep looking for your next starter.  He has Bledsoe, who got injured and his backup ended up being the GOAT. Even while he had that going, he kept getting his next guy and developing them. When Brady got hurt, Cassel stepped in and went 11-5 and they missed the wild card by dumb luck. Who knows how far they would have gone if they had gotten in. Jimmy Gs career started in NE. There were others, but he always kept looking.  You can't be afraid to keep looking for your next starter, but it looks like we're afraid to look for more than a marginal one. If you're going to offer a $25m contract with incentives, that screams marginal QB. It also screams you're just a transition until we find our guy. After a 10 or 11 win season, he's not accepting that offer. And then you're in a Daniel Jones situation. Do you pay for a year of success and pray it wasn't a one year wonder?  To this point, Bryce has really produced nothing, yet for whatever reason, our FO has not even sniffed at the idea that we need a real QB room with real QBs. Dalton was never starter potential, Plummer was a joke. KP certainly isn't, neither is Grier.  Our approach to the QB room needs to be one of strength not fear. Bring in guys who can compete or who you think can compete. This is THE elite position, in an elite sport, paid premium salary, where production matters. Either you produce or you can lose your job. It's not mean, it's just the reality of the position.  And I'm really just tired of our candy ass approach to it. 
    • If you plug Bryce onto the Pro Bowl roster you might have a chance to compete for a SB. If he's surrounded by top tier talent with a top tier defense on the other side, a field flipping punter, and a kicker good from 60+ you might have a chance. But that means you basically have to recreate Saban's Bama in the NFL and that's impossible... and Bryce couldn't win a championship in that environment either. What the Panthers didn't realize when they got so obsessed with his "PG mentality" was that what they were looking st was a "barely checks the box PG". The basketball equivalent of Bryce would be an undersized PG with marginal athleticism who can make the basic plays but adds nothing to the team in terms of elevating the overall team. Not a great shooter, not a great defender, not a great driver. Just a guy who can basically get you into the offense and be a matador on defense. Basically a placeholder while you look to upgrade the PG position. 
×
×
  • Create New...