Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Possible move to the Charlotte area


Bruce Wayne

Recommended Posts

South Charlotte and anywhere between the Ballantyne area and Mint Hill.

There are other areas that are OK. You will get more house for you money in North Charlotte or University area but they schools aren't as nice and the area isn't as nice. It just depends on what you want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless he is in Cleveland or Cinnci. It doesn't get much trashier than that.

I currently live north of Cincy near Dayton. This area is falling apart. Dayton is an automotive town but now all of the auto plants are closed. With so many companies and jobs leaving this area I'm starting to look elsewhere in the company.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you move to matthews mint hill or ballentyne be prepared to be bored out of your mind and not know any of your neighbors...

I live in Mint Hill and know my neighbors. We don't hang out because they are all old but I we talk on Saturdays and Sundays while we are all doing yard work....OK maybe we are old too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:) no prob

I don't look to my neighbors to have a good time though. Of course I've lived here my whole life and have friends that I've known for years.

I guess neighbors are important when you are moving to a new town and know no one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...