Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Norv Turner sucks

therealmjl

By therealmjl,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

rico6 Grand Master

rico6

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Castavar said:

Not to mention we would have already burnt CMC out by then. So yeah, even in the off chance we make the playoffs, it would be all for nothing since CMC would literally be worn out by then. I just don't get it, every single good team out there has a good RB committee. Saints have Kamara/Murray, Packers have Aaron Jones/Williams, 49ers have Coleman/Breida, Seahawks have Carson/Penny, Chiefs have McCoy/Williams, etc. Hell, even the Vikings are spelling Dalvin Cook. I just don't get why we don't even try to establish a #2 behind CMC so he won't be out of the league by year 5 due to mileage. We need a new approach and new innovative coaches that can take advantage of the talent we have before it's too late.

God damn, this.

If CMAC is this overused after next season I don’t see how logical it would be to sign him to a Zeek level contract. 
 

It fuging kills me, Norv in San Diego had Michael Turner and Darren Sproles but still ran LT into the dirt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Saca312 Experienced

Saca312

Posted
Posted

all honesty looking back at the 49ers game, lots of receivers were open.

kyle allen literally was abysmal at progressing through his reads and recognizing who'd be open. 

i've been a norv turner critic in the past, so yeah i'm not exactly making things up when i say he's been creative. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
raz Newbie

raz

Posted
Posted
47 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

all honesty looking back at the 49ers game, lots of receivers were open (a few times) ftfy

kyle allen literally was abysmal at progressing through his reads and recognizing who'd be open. 

i've been a norv turner critic in the past, so yeah i'm not exactly making things up when i say he's been creative. 

it was the first game i've seen like that from allen, not to mention his accuracy was complete shite.   still no reason to abandon the run from norv so early.   still no reason to not call more screens and misdirection.  this was a complete shitshow and it included norv.   we watched them do to our D what we try and do to opposing D's.   norv is old and predictable.   he called an awful game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • csx
      Quick FYI

      By csx · Posted

      Get well
    • PanthersGTI
      Kyle trask released by bucs

      By PanthersGTI · Posted

      He's not wrong though. You talk like a politician on here. Leaving yourself just enough wiggle room to say you never fully counted Bryce out if you need to....But we can all see it. Just say you think he is a bust outright and you will have to type a lot less. Obfuscating your opinion behind QB3 competitions etc....
    • d-dave
      Experience with Electric Vehicles?

      By d-dave · Posted

      Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
×
×
  • Create New...