Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Have the Panthers redeemed themsleves?


Kevin Greene

Recommended Posts

No. There are still two major liabilities that didn't change in this game, Delhomme and Davidson. I'm more convinced Delhomme can bounce back but at this point in time I still see no reason to stick with him...

Davidson on the other hand completely shut down our own offense in the second half and if it wasn't for some great plays on defense we would have lost the game after a 21 point lead. That is inexcusable. Not only that but our selection of pass plays were awful in the second half, we didn't do anything to force them away from 8-9 in the box.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll say "no" because I dont think that game was the monkey. I think the monkey was starting 0-3 and going into this game 2-4.

It was a nice win and I'll hold on to it for a week. I think the problems wont change until Fox is gone. Example: We had the ball with nearly a minute and a half left, had our timeouts and the ball at midfield and Fox wouldnt even try to get 20 yards to FG range. He's far too passive with a win and you cant win big games like that in the long run.

I also think Delhomme has trouble reading defenses. When pressured he's a totally different QB than when he has time. Not even remotely similar. I noticed today he totally dismisses backside receivers when he's pressured. He had some wide open dump passes on the back side tonight and didnt see them.

I love Delhomme personally. I really feel bad for him. I think there are multiple problems but I think one is coaching. I think they HAVE to change at HC and OC. Just my take.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm more convinced Delhomme can bounce back but at this point in time I still see no reason to stick with him...

So what's the option with Delhomme? Moore? Moore has shown nothing. Also, Delhomme has a 42.5 million dollar contract. If they get rid of him, someone's gotta lose their job for that one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

as much as i loved that win....it isn't over. t could be that they have turned the corner but they have a long ways to go before they can show they have.

remember, the raiders beat the eagles. it's just one game.

there are still issues with the QB and playcalling but the defense looked incredible. martin at FS was great. peppers keeps improving.

i have more faith now but there are still some huge games head.

if they can somehow beat the saints next week i might start drinking the koolaid again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moore has shown nothing. I goes the 2 wins and 1 loss in his rookie year ain't good enough for some people this board. And people all of a sudden started talking bad about Moore today after he throw a floater out to the sidelines to a TE that was slightly overthrown. What do people expect out of Moore when coaches don't give him a chance to prove crap. aleast that pass he throw on 3and 2nd wasn't no where near been int like most of Jakes has been all year. Plus what do you expect when Moore is suddenly throwed into the game and only has one pass the whole game. People are quick to judge moore who has yet really play this year. Only in a few snaps and most of them was handoffs to the RBs. So leave Moore alone.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In many ways you are absolutely right. I cant dispute it. I dont blame anything on Moore today. Im just saying that he didnt impress me at all when Delhomme went down a couple years ago. sure he was young and he hasnt had many chances to come in but, I assume the coaches see him everyday in practice and he's done nothing to take the starting job from Jake. I'm not against Moore as a 2nd string QB. I simply want a good starting QB. I can assume since Moore has fulfilled his full contract after this season and has done nothing in practice to take over the job, he's not going to be a stud starting QB.

That's all I'm saying. Not knocking him. I just dont think he's a long term solution, and if he's not, then you definately play the 42 million dollar man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • There's a long history of that here. Byron Bell, Sione Fua, Ian Thomas, Mingo, Bryce Young....I just don't get it.     
    • Summary Week 1 looked a lot like the last couple of years and that's not good. A whole lot of "blah" all around. Losing Turk might be big. Him not being on the DL was not the reason for JAX's run game success on Sunday, but proved to be a better run stopper than anticipated. Valued part of the overhauled DL and it's never good to be immediately out after going down. Hopefully isn't as bad as anticipated but definitely severe enough for him to be out 4 - 6 weeks. Kaye thinks that Bryce got off to a really good start and that his weapons, sans TMac, let him down regularly though Bryce had his own blunders as well. Also felt that he was much worse after the weather delay. OL wasn't particularly good either. Guys were getting out of the huddle late and snapping the ball with very little time remaining. Extended drives that shouldn't have been that long (goes into detail later about this). Bryce is fine but does have to be better and this did look more like a regressive moment rather than progressive. Might have overvalued the finish to the season due to not having much to play for other than be spoilers. PFF offensive and passing grades were discussed. ADOT: 8.8yds - Not great, but not dump it off Bryce that we saw in 2024 ACP - 70%. (ngl, as much as people complain about BTTs being a made up stat it's very difficult for me to take the adjusted completion percentage stat seriously). 12 pressures - Not a way to operate as a QB. Only took 1 sack officially but this means he has to run around to try and get the ball out on time. 8/15 on 3rd down, over 50% is healthy for an offense All of that said, there was still 3 turnovers and operational issues on the offense (getting out of the huddle late, getting the snap off late, snap issues, etc). Bryce as a passer on Sunday was okay, but as a QB he was not good. Had multiple drives ~5min each when trailing by a score or two. Third drive of the game that took place in Q2 lasted 4:53 the team gained 39yds and got two first downs before punting. Took off roughly 1/3rd of the quarter, effectively running the clock out on themselves. Second one took 5:15 and that led to 55yds net (29yds in actual scrimmage, 26yds from penalties) and was the one that ended at 4th & 1 on the JAX 5. They had another drive that 4:10 where they gained 10yds net and got one first down. How can they operate eating away into their own opportunities? Gave 3 possessions to the opposing team and spent what was basically an entire quarter just burning clock. Poor clock management. What happened on Sunday cannot happen again in Arizona. Game should be close and they cannot afford to squander opportunities especially with a defense that gives up the rushing yardage that they do. TMac looked really good and showed a lot of flash. XL... this is back-to-back really good summers but man you have to have some situational awareness. His rookie season was greatly underrated considering what he did in the first half of it. Bryce had a couple of throws that weren't turnovers that he'd want back ie: slot fade to Renfrow, 4th & 1 ball that he just threw up. Physically he was very effective as a passer, but from the mental/decision making side he was not as good. 4th & 1 from the 5 you need to get, give it to Chuba. Yea they stopped it twice before but if Chuba is the guy that is going to make the offense run you've got to go to him. Neither Mike nor Alex would've gone with an empty set in that situation. Passing game was just not working: guys were dropping passes, mis-running routes, not paying attention properly (like not turning their heads). Wouldn't put that on Bryce given how him and the offense were ineffective for the first three quarters. It was the right call to go for it on 4th & 1.  Pivoting to the defense, the run defense is still bad when looking at the numbers. During just the Dave Canales era, the Panthers' defense has allowed 200+ rushing yards nine times (including in seven consecutive games). Even in wins they are getting the ball ran on them heavily. In 35 games as the Panthers DC, Evero's defense has given up 200+ rushing yards 26 times. Only nine games have been under that amount. This scheme does a good job with coverage, especially on the outside, but it's been three years of allowed rushing success. It'd be one thing if they were sacrificing run defense for a pass rush, but not having any pressure in this game while also giving up 200+ yards is very frustrating. Isn't because of being a 3-4 defense, otherwise other 3-4 defenses would have the same issues. Young guys on the defensive side of the ball got very limited opportunities vs. veterans even if the veterans were failing. Evero's history does not play into playing young guys early. DJ Wonnum isn't exactly a Pro Bowl pass rusher that can't leave the field, neither is Pat Jones II, and Nick Scott certainly isn't. If those guys aren't ready, what on the field showed you that the guys that are playing are ready? Moehrig had a rough day in pass coverage. Coen had the TEs targeted often against him. Jaycee Horn + Mike Jackson have been terrific and the scheme benefits them, and while Nick Scott wasn't terrible he's still a replacement level player. A 30yr old safety with limited upside playing on the backend over Lathan Ransom who had a great summer or Demani Richardson who had a great season last year is being antithetical to what Canales says about playing and teaching none guys. Canales said he was going to push for it and people are asking why he doesn't just big boy Evero, but Evero was retained and is the guy for the defense. Scourton and Umanmielen have a lot of potential. Last season's team had no talent on the defense and no depth, but now that they've got these young guys he's not playing them. Hard to be championed as an awesome head coaching candidate if he won't play the kids. "Who have they developed on defense over the last three years?" Yeesh... Mike's got a point. Alex responds that Demani is a guy, but he didn't get to play much at all last week. I'm a little over halfway through but gotta pick up dinner for the family. Will try to finish up tonight or tomorrow morning.
    • Only truly stupid or ignorant people disliked Cam Newton. He made our franchise relevant he tried to change the culture despite constantly being criticized for hating to lose. He looked the part out of the gate in a lockout year too. He was the complete opposite of what we have now. There is zero culture here. Just guys who make hollow generic statements over and over. I have no idea how anyone that isn't under the influence of something could draw parallels to the prime Cam era with that we have now. It's honestly offensive 🤷‍♂️
×
×
  • Create New...