Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gaulden gone


mc52beast

Recommended Posts

Just now, Toomers said:

So coming off a SB team, you decided that Gettleman was the devil reborn before another game was played. And it had nothing to do with Josh. Who you bestowed magical powers on earlier? Sure. Go with that. Really doesn’t matter. You are the most biased poster on this board when it comes to Hurney. That’s a fact. Yet you have the nerve to call everyone else out for being biased. That’s the definition of hypocritical.  

  

You are an idiot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Toomers said:

   Not much obviously. Your first example last week was something like that but No “bad GM”. 
If you said that why not post those if you said it enough to Cry “how many times”?  So which is it? 

 

2ZgqAIA.jpgCould you shut up or do you want to shift goalposts again?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Car123 said:

 

2ZgqAIA.jpgCould you shut up or do you want to shift goalposts again?

 Ok. Waiting for the “how many times” part. One don’t do it. And until you can show more than I’ve already posted, you are still a hypocrite. That’s where the goalposts have been since last week. But you have almost one a year. Almost. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Toomers said:

 Ok. Waiting for the “how many times” part. One don’t do it. And until you can show more than I’ve already posted, you are still a hypocrite. That’s where the goalposts have been since last week. But you have almost one a year. Almost. 

You haven't posted anything but Matt Kalil. Everyone one but the Kalil family thinks that signing was awful.

 Show me a post of you criticizing a DG draft or pick. That's right you can't find it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Toomers said:

 Ok. Waiting for the “how many times” part. One don’t do it. And until you can show more than I’ve already posted, you are still a hypocrite. That’s where the goalposts have been since last week. But you have almost one a year. Almost. 

pzNUEyQ.jpg

Went from one post to 100. 
Like I said, shifting goalposts. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Car123 said:

You haven't posted anything but Matt Kalil. Everyone one but the Kalil family thinks that signing was awful.

 Show me a post of you criticizing a DG draft or pick. That's right you can't find it.

Criticizing the signing calling it a “dark day in Panther history” is a pretty strong statement. Much more than”I like the pick”. 
 

  How about defending Hurney and putting 100%  of the blame on Gettleman for the restructure to Kalil’s contract. Someone you could have done with more aptitude and basic math skills. 
 

 And the best part, you QUOTED the freaking post on the previous page. And your dumb ass calls me out. Moron. Slow down and pay attention to your mountain of hypocrisy. Now, go find it and actually try to read this time. 
 

 Where’s those MANY of yours again. Did Josh make them disappear?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Car123 said:

pzNUEyQ.jpg

Went from one post to 100. 
Like I said, shifting goalposts. :)

   That’s cool. You have about 4-5 posts that maybe one has any strong opinion(and there supposed to be “how many” of them). I’ve provided 10-15x the proof that I’ll bash anyone. But any opinion not like yours is biased. Where you are 99.9%(now proven) biased yourself and call out others when you are the absolute definition of biased. Once a year blurbs really don’t mean much. Do you really think anyone believes you’re less biased now because it’s not 100% and just 99.9%. I left the goalposts alone a let you hang yourself. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Toomers said:

   That’s cool. You have about 4-5 posts that maybe one has any strong opinion(and there supposed to be “how many” of them). I’ve provided 10-15x the proof that I’ll bash anyone. But any opinion not like yours is biased. Where you are 99.9%(now proven) biased yourself and call out others when you are the absolute definition of biased. Once a year blurbs really don’t mean much. Do you really think anyone believes you’re less biased now because it’s not 100% and just 99.9%. I left the goalposts alone a let you hang yourself. 

So Hurney was a terrible gm from 2009-2012 isn't a strong opinion but Kalil was an expensive signing is? Jfc :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Car123 said:

So Hurney was a terrible gm from 2009-2012 isn't a strong opinion but Kalil was an expensive signing is? Jfc :)

That the one I was talking about. And I would have thought you were smart enough to know.that. That didn’t really make it to the “how many times do I have to say “ example though.

 

And calling it a dark day in Panther history is a far cry from an “expensive signing” or whatever you’re making up I meant. 
 

Any luck finding the post you demanded but already quoted

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Toomers said:

That the one I was talking about. And I would have thought you were smart enough to know.that. That didn’t really make it to the “how many times do I have to say “ example though.

Still waiting on a strong opinion from you. Kalil does not count. No one but mama Kalil defends that move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Car123 said:

Still waiting on a strong opinion from you. Kalil does not count. No one but mama Kalil defends that move.

Really. A Dark Day isn’t strong enough.but you one post in 6 years is? Not happening. If you read the post you quoted, you would see the draft bashing. 
 

  And why no Kalil. That’s ignorant. You don’t hesitate(and no one should) to use it to bash Gman. But I can’t use I was the biggest detractor? Sure that’s fair. What other rules. You want all my CMC bashing. Plenty of folks remember that. 
 

   But you did “like” on of his picks. That’s as strong as your Josh Norman—Dr. Strange drivel. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah and I am doubtful he can offer that consistently. I don’t have many years left at my age and in my view we have wasted two and this whole exercise with him was always a three year minimum.  I am out on that with a guy I don’t believe in, and never believed in, it has sucked. To me it is a costly detour off the right track. Years.    But I am not so rigid that I can’t see excellence. He needs to display it though, consistently before I change my outlook.  
    • No, when I said rage, I meant rage, which only applies to certain fans on this board. Your timeline of trying to assess whether he is the future or not is really tied to the discussions surrounding his second contract. If this team is going to commit to some monster contract while he has shown nothing but glimpses of brilliance would be deservedly worrisome, so the clock is genuinely ticking for him to settle into something resembling his final form. Perhaps a best case scenario is that he plays well, the team succeeds, but he does so with a more limited role that makes the rest of the league view him as a game manager, and his second contract value reflects that. Then he continues to improve and becomes a bargain comparatively while not handicapping the team around him, and we enter an era of consistent championship competitiveness that the fanbase has craved for decades and has never really experienced before. But that requires many, many things to go right and for Bryce himself to facilitate that if he ends up being the quarterback of the future.
    • Exactly. And the flame throwers as well, get location benefits from not going all out. But they have it in reserve.  Not sure how much Greg had but he was an artist.  There was a YouTube I came across last year or maybe even 2023 and I don’t how to even find now but it had two NFL QBs I want say one was Carr from the Raiders but I don’t really remember  The point of it is they stood side by side throwing identical distances to identical targets. Radar gun was used.  They threw the normal effort (not all out) and it was measured etc. Then they were asked to throw their ‘fastball’. They were missing and most often they were missing high. It demonstrated the same principle.    edit: and applying that to arm strength, give me the guy that doesn’t need max effort to have good velocity. The margins are so narrow with less velocity in tne NFL the defenders can Close on it and this is a league where they value down to the 100th of a second level. It is that tight 
×
×
  • Create New...