Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So.. I've never been to a Huddle tailgate...


Samuel L. Jackson

Recommended Posts

.. and have been posting here for probably at least 6 or 7 years...

Is that a sad fact or what?

Honestly, I was pondering what would happen if I did show up to one sometime... like, how I would probably shatter people's ideas of me...

I'm a fat white guy with a shaved head and glasses, a feeble attempt at a beard (yeah, sometimes I get lazy and it even gets neck-beardish), and am generally probably not as abrasive as I most likely represent myself... I'm happily married to a wonderful/beautiful woman and probably have a lot going for me at the moment compared to a lot of people... In all reality, I'm a pretty deep thinker and tend to be more of an introvert...

Don't get me wrong... I speak what's on my mind most of the time, and while quite a few of my views are probably extreme compared to most, I'd likely be friends with any one of you... I can always agree to disagree and just share good times, good food, and Panthers football...

lol.. I don't really know where this is coming from or where it is going, but it was just an odd thing I was thinking about this morning...

Maybe it is that whole g5jamz thing in his "Homosexuals = pedophiles" thread.. lol.. While I totally loathe most of the dude's ideals, and as much as I would love to jump at the opportunity to slam him (I've gone to respond in that thread a few times after Fiz's post, only to decide against it other than the "sick, sick burn" comment), I think I've just gotten past that point and realized that to an extent, none of us probably represent our true selves 100% on here all the time...

lol GD I am sounding like an emo record now... I'll stop... maybe this is just a pointless thread... someone smack me back to my alternate reality...

kthxbai

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.

I'm a fat white guy with a shaved head and glasses, a feeble attempt at a beard (yeah, sometimes I get lazy and it even gets neck-beardish), and am generally probably not as abrasive as I most likely represent myself...

Sounds like youd fit in perfectly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do you care what people here think about you?

My mom told me a long time ago that the only people you have to worry about are those that fu#$ you and pay your bills!

Just be yourself dude... If people don't like you they can kiss you where the good Lord split ya!!

That is just my 2 cents!

Jeff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think the book has been fairly written on Darnold, and by and large stays true. He can be rattled by pressure, and will lose his composure. If a team can get to him and have something go wrong in the plan, the mistakes and errors will pile up. Rams have a better offense, Seahawks sport a better defense. Should be a good 1.
    • Not a defense of him...an understanding of the problem. (something you seem to be lacking right now) 🙄 Bryce in a Canales offense is not an example of a stylistic mismatch, but I can give you one if that helps. When he was playing for the Panthers, Cam Newton sat under OC's running Coryell type offenses. Newton had a big arm and was a strong runner. He fit into that sort of attack very well. Then he goes to New England, where at the time they were running an Earhardt-Perkins system (similar to WCO In a lot of what they do but very different terminology). The Patriot offenses back then were heavily based on timing and rhythm style passing, not something that Newton was especially well suited for. So he washed out at New England, not because he had poor ability (his abilities had been on display here on a regular basis) but because he didn't fit what they wanted to do with their offense. I always go back to Jeff Garcia as one of the prime examples of this issue. Garcia in a WCO looked like a world beater. Put him in any other scheme though...yikes!  So again, Young's issues here have nothing to do with any failure to mesh with Canales. Hell, is say Canales has actually done pretty well at adapting his system to who he has rather than trying to jam square pegs into round holes. Again, it doesn't take an elite level of football knowledge to get this. It's pretty basic. But if you're not even capable of understanding what the real problem is, how are you going to know you to find the right solution? 🤔
×
×
  • Create New...