Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Backup QB philosophy


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

No other team in the NFL makes that deal.

I'm not convinced every team in the league sees Trubisky the same way we do. Heck, even the Panthers might have a higher opinion. Hard to say. There have been rumors.

Bottom Line: There's 32 teams out there and it only takes one.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

There is no fuging reason for us to take him OTHER than being on a cheap one year deal. We need to be preserving our cap for players that actually have a chance to be a part of our franchise in 3-4 years.

Trubisky is closer to a bottom 15 QB than a top 15 QB. That is also dumb. Are you trying to set a Huddle record for the amount of dumb posts in one thread?

I tell ya what, we’ll let what actually happens determine who’s dumb here. If Mitch plays next year on a one year, 2-2.5 mil deal, then I’m dumb. If he plays for 5+ mil, then look in the mirror pal. 

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stirs said:

You might have the same opinion, but would not be yelling it through gritted teeth.

Me? Na, not worked up a bit, my man. Just having fun. You’ll have to pardon me if posters who insist my take is dumb and from a dipshit don’t immediately gain my respect. Especially when the same poster can’t decide in two consecutive posts what he thinks the QB we're discussing is worth, yet is sure my take is horrible. 
 

I stand by my statement that locking Trubisky up over the next 5 years for backup QB money would be a positive for the Panthers. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ECHornet said:

Me? Na, not worked up a bit, my man. Just having fun. You’ll have to pardon me if posters who insist my take is dumb and from a dipshit don’t immediately gain my respect. Especially when the same poster can’t decide in two consecutive posts what he thinks the QB we're discussing is worth, yet is sure my take is horrible. 
 

I stand by my statement that locking Trubisky up over the next 5 years for backup QB money would be a positive for the Panthers. 
 

 

From a pure purchasing standpoint, buying and selling, why the middle ground?

If teams see him as a good enough player for a 5 year deal, then how can his agent let them get by with only $5 million per season?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm not convinced every team in the league sees Trubisky the same way we do. Heck, even the Panthers might have a higher opinion. Hard to say. There have been rumors.

Bottom Line: There's 32 teams out there and it only takes one.

I'm talking about the Heinicke deal. No other team in the NFL gives him that deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stirs said:

From a pure purchasing standpoint, buying and selling, why the middle ground?

If teams see him as a good enough player for a 5 year deal, then how can his agent let them get by with only $5 million per season?

Valid point and appreciate the discussion. I’m not saying we’d be able to pull it off, but with the uncertainty surrounding his landing spot next year and his clear ties to our area, I’d try to secure him for as long and as cheap as possible. His potential, even at this point in his career, is on par with QBs some want to sell the farm for to move up in the draft. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I'm talking about the Heinicke deal. No other team in the NFL gives him that deal.

Heinicke? Probably not.

I'd say this though: In a given offseason, I might hear myself saying "wow, they got him for cheap"...or I might not.

On the flipside, the exclamation "holy sh-t, they paid that for him?'" probably gets used up to a half dozen times on an annual basis.

(pretty frequently on the first day of free agency)

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ‘Just crazy hot streaks don’t look like this:       Sat, 1/3 @CHI W112-99  12-23 Bridges 26 Bridges 14 Ball 7 Mon, 1/5 @OKC W124-97  13-23 Miller 28 Diabate 12 Knueppel 5 Wed, 1/7 vsTOR L97-96  13-24 Sexton 22 Diabate 11 Ball 7 Thu, 1/8 vsIND L114-112  13-25 Ball 33 Knueppel 8 Ball 8 Sat, 1/10 @UTAH W150-95  14-25 Mann 20 Diabate 10 Knueppel 6 Mon, 1/12 @LAC L117-109  14-26 Ball 25 Diabate 15 Ball 5 Thu, 1/15 @LAL W135-117  15-26 Ball 30 Bridges 8 Ball 11 Sat, 1/17 @GS L136-116  15-27 Miller 28 Knueppel 11 Miller 5 Sun, 1/18 @DEN W110-87  16-27 Miller 23 Salaun 11 Ball 6 Wed, 1/21 vsCLE L94-87  16-28 Miller 24 Knueppel 11 Ball 7 Thu, 1/22 @ORL W124-97  17-28 Miller 20 Knueppel 10 Ball 7 Sat, 1/24 vsWSH W119-115  18-28 Miller 21 Diabate 14 Ball 11 Mon, 1/26 vsPHI W130-93  19-28 Miller 30 Kalkbrenner 9 Ball 8 Wed, 1/28 @MEM W112-97  20-28 Miller 26 Diabate 19 Knueppel 6 Thu, 1/29 @DAL W123-121  21-28 Knueppel 34 Bridges 8 Ball 9 Sat, 1/31 vsSA W111-106  22-28 Miller 26 Diabate 10 Ball 8 Mon, 2/2 vsNO W102-95  23-28 Ball 24 Knueppel 9 Ball 5 Thu, 2/5 @HOU W109-99  24-28 Knueppel 24 Diabate 12 Ball 4 Sat, 2/7 @ATL W126-119  25-28 Bridges 26 Diabate 15 Ball 9 Mon, 2/9 vsDET L110-104  25-29 Miller 24 Diabate 6 Williams 5 Wed, 2/11 vsATL W110-107  26-29 Miller 31 Hall 10 Ball 6 Thu, 2/19 vsHOU L105-101  26-30 Williams 20 Williams 9 Miller 7 Fri, 2/20 vsCLE L118-113  26-31 Knueppel 33 Kalkbrenner 13 James 7 Sun, 2/22 @WSH W129-112  27-31 Ball 37 Kalkbrenner 9 Ball 7 Tue, 2/24 @CHI W131-99  28-31 Miller 23 Bridges 7 Ball 7 Thu, 2/26 @IND W133-109  29-31 Miller 33 Diabate 11 Ball 8 Sat, 2/28 vsPOR W109-93  30-31 Miller 26 Diabate 11 Ball 8 Tue, 3/3 vsDAL W117-90  31-31 Miller 17 James 8 Ball 9 Wed, 3/4 @BOS W118-89  32-31 Knueppel 20 Diabate 9 White 6
    • Ok now they are kicking ass 
×
×
  • Create New...