Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So Kellen Mond anyone?

Ricky Spanish

By Ricky Spanish,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Varking Grand Master

Varking

Posted
Posted
Just now, top dawg said:

Yeah, you moved the goalposts when it became apparent that he is a legit first round prospect. When you said you didn't want him, there weren't any qualifiers. As a matter of fact, you said that you hope someone else takes him.

Moved the goalposts? I’ve been clear in my preferences are Lawrence, Wilson, Fields and then Lance, in that order. Is he who I want? No. I want Lawrence. Can’t get Lawrence? Next I’d want Wilson. Can’t get Wilson? Next I’d want Fields. Can’t get Fields? Then I’d want Lance. I would not want Lance if any of the other three are on the board. Pretty simple to follow. 
 

As for when it became apparent he is a first round talent? When have I said he wasn’t a first round talent? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Varking said:

Moved the goalposts? I’ve been clear in my preferences are Lawrence, Wilson, Fields and then Lance, in that order. Is he who I want? No. I want Lawrence. Can’t get Lawrence? Next I’d want Wilson. Can’t get Wilson? Next I’d want Fields. Can’t get Fields? Then I’d want Lance. I would not want Lance if any of the other three are on the board. Pretty simple to follow. 
 

As for when it became apparent he is a first round talent? When have I said he wasn’t a first round talent? 

You said you didn't want Lance without any qualification, that's what you said. Own up to it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Varking Grand Master

Varking

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, top dawg said:

You said you didn't want Lance without any qualification, that's what you said. Own up to it!

I’ve never written “I don’t want Lance without any qualification” in my life until just now. Stop trying to tell others how they think. You haven’t got a clue. 

Ive written it for you like three other times now. I only want Lance if Fields, Wilson and Lawrence are all off the board. And if he is drafted by us before the others are gone I’d still understand why we would draft him. 
 

If you are still confused after this conversation then that’s an issue with you, not me. Just a post ago you wrote some drivel about me moving goalposts after it became apparent Lance was a first round talent… I’d like to ask you to pull the quote where I said he wasn’t a first round talent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, Varking said:

I’ve never written “I don’t want Lance without any qualification” in my life until just now. Stop trying to tell others how they think. You haven’t got a clue. 

Ive written it for you like three other times now. I only want Lance if Fields, Wilson and Lawrence are all off the board. And if he is drafted by us before the others are gone I’d still understand why we would draft him. 
 

If you are still confused after this conversation then that’s an issue with you, not me. Just a post ago you wrote some drivel about me moving goalposts after it became apparent Lance was a first round talent… I’d like to ask you to pull the quote where I said he wasn’t a first round talent. 

That wasn't in quotes. The "without qualifications" part was a description of what you said and the context in which you said it. You said that "I don't want Lance," or something almost verbatim, and you know you did!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Varking Grand Master

Varking

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, top dawg said:

That wasn't in quotes. The "without qualifications" part was a description of what you said and the context in which you said it. You said that "I don't want Lance," or something almost verbatim, and you know you did!

When you seemed confused about how I felt about Lance I clarified for you. I then have done it multiple times now. Now is the third time I’m asking you to produce the quote where I claimed he wasn’t a first round talent.
 

You’ve posted a ton here. I know you aren’t stupid or malicious. I think with the amount you post you have me confused for somebody else. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Varking said:

When you seemed confused about how I felt about Lance I clarified for you. I then have done it multiple times now. Now is the third time I’m asking you to produce the quote where I claimed he wasn’t a first round talent.
 

You’ve posted a ton here. I know you aren’t stupid or malicious. I think with the amount you post you have me confused for somebody else. 

Did you not say that you didn't want Lance (full stop)? Did you not say that you hope someone else gets Lance (full stop)? Yes or no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Varking Grand Master

Varking

Posted
Posted
Just now, top dawg said:

Did you not say that you didn't want Lance (full stop)? Did you not say that you hope someone else gets Lance (full stop)? Yes or no?

Produce. The. Quote. Where. I. Said. He. Wasn’t. A. First. Round. Talent.

 

Or admit you lied. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Varking said:

I was wrong to assume you weren’t malicious or stupid. Haven’t pegged which one it is yes. But I was wrong about that and I’m sorry. 

Yeah, trying to move the goalposts again by saying that I said that you said he wasn't a first round prospect. You know he's a first round prospect. That's too damned easy. You just like to talk negatively about him like he's not! I think you're chicken poo for not being man enough to admit what you said and the manner in which you said it!

It's OK to clarify statements that beg for clarification. It's OK to change or modify your opinion once you gain more facts. What is not OK is to act like you were always on board with Lance when from your statements, you clearly weren't.

Edited by top dawg
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Varking Grand Master

Varking

Posted
Posted
Just now, top dawg said:

Yeah, trying to move the goalposts again by saying that I said that you said he wasn't a first round prospect. You know he's a first round prospect. That's too damned easy. You just like to talk negatively about him like he's not! I think you're chicken poo for not being man enough to admit what you said and the manner in which you said it!

It's OK to clarify statements that beg for clarification. It's OK to change or modify your opinion once you gain more facts. What a not OK is to act like you were always on board with Lance when from your statements, you clearly weren't.

You’re on an internet message board talking about being chicken? Are you going to invite me to meet you at the flagpole at 3:30 after school to throw down? 
 

I don’t want us to draft Lance. My want is to grab Wilson or Fields, realistically. If we miss out on them and we grab Lance am I going to be mad? Absolutely not. And no I haven’t always been on board with any of these QBs. 
 

If Sewell somehow drops I’d rather grab him than reach for a Jones or Mond. If you believe me being critical of him is me trashing him then you are being dramatically soft. I can spend plenty of time being critical of any of the QB prospects. None of them are slam dunks. 
 

I wrote Lance can work on his accuracy and to you that means I don’t believe he’s a first round talent? That’s you making up stuff to be hurt about. I said Lance is my QB4 for like two months now and somehow that means to  you that I don’t think he’s a first round talent. That’s you making stuff up to be hurt about. 
 

We are too old for you to be this dramatic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Varking said:

You’re on an internet message board talking about being chicken? Are you going to invite me to meet you at the flagpole at 3:30 after school to throw down? 
 

I don’t want us to draft Lance. My want is to grab Wilson or Fields, realistically. If we miss out on them and we grab Lance am I going to be mad? Absolutely not. And no I haven’t always been on board with any of these QBs. 
 

If Sewell somehow drops I’d rather grab him than reach for a Jones or Mond. If you believe me being critical of him is me trashing him then you are being dramatically soft. I can spend plenty of time being critical of any of the QB prospects. None of them are slam dunks. 
 

I wrote Lance can work on his accuracy and to you that means I don’t believe he’s a first round talent? That’s you making up stuff to be hurt about. I said Lance is my QB4 for like two months now and somehow that means to  you that I don’t think he’s a first round talent. That’s you making stuff up to be hurt about. 
 

We are too old for you to be this dramatic. 

Yeah, whatever with all your dramatics...

I have been as consistent as anyone saying that Lance will take time to transform into a pro. I have consistently said that all he needs is development (as any QB transitioning from college) and reps! I stand by it. There are no reservations, no pontifications and no vacillations! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Varking Grand Master

Varking

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Yeah, whatever with all your dramatics...

I have been as consistent as anyone saying that Lance will take time to transform into a pro. I have consistently said that all he needs is development (as any QB transitioning from college) and reps! I stand by it. There are no reservations, no pontifications and no vacillations! 

Happy you are backing him. It bothers me 0. Hope your day gets better, friend. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Varking said:

Happy you are backing him. It bothers me 0. Hope your day gets better, friend. 

My day is great! I suspect that yours aren't considering the same old tired modus operandi you use when someone challenges your b.s.

Edited by top dawg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The Question
      Greg Cosell on Bryce Young

      By The Question · Posted

      You making fun of or not realizing how important that actually is leads me to believe you don’t have either of those assets and are subconsciously upset about it, or you’ve never been in a position to be a leader and thus you don’t value good leadership which Bryce oozes with. 
    • The Question
      Greg Cosell on Bryce Young

      By The Question · Posted

      I said this last night to family. You can look at Bryce as not a “strong and physical” presence and that’s not going to change on you can look at it, that this guy has the type of skillset that sets him up to only get better for the next 5-7 years every year. He’s not going to know less about the game next year than this year. His timing will be better, his pocket presence better (even though the guy works around a pocket amazingly in my opinion), everything is just going to improve every year and I believed he’s already proved the doubters wrong other than nut huggers on here who just want a big strong man to drool over.
    • MHS831
      Are the Panthers a "Trap Game" for the Hawks?

      By MHS831 · Posted

      The Seahawks won an emotional, divisional, overtime rivalry game vs the Rams on a Thursday night (Dec 18).  That gives them 10 days to prepare for the Panthers, but the Christmas holiday fell a week later--I bet they were afforded an extra day for travel-many coming back east.  Following the Panthers, Seattle plays at San Francisco for the division title (in all probability).   The Rams finish the season with games against the Falcons and Cardinals, two likely wins, pushing them to 13-4.  The Niners finish the season with home games against the Bears and Seahawks. Seattle finishes the season with the Panthers on the road and SF in California.   It is easy to see how preparing for the Panthers, during the holiday break and with the Niners waiting for them in SF a week later for (what could be) the NFC West title and #1 Seed in the NFC, could create the perfect trap game scenario.  The Panthers at home are 5-2.   In the past 2 weeks, the Seahawks struggled to beat the Phillip Rivers Colts in Seattle and then pulled off a miraculous, emotional victory at home vs. the Rams.  I am not convinced that they are as good as advertised. Seattle is a TD favorite in Charlotte.  I feel that Carolina by 3 may be more accurate.  While I am still not confident in this team's consistency and it never seems to dominate, it sure feels like a trap game for Seattle to me.  How could they NOT be thinking of San Francisco right now?  They are not used to being in this position (current players) and it is human nature.  Carolina 27, Seattle 24. 
×
×
  • Create New...