Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is anyone covering our game this week?


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

Or are they just waiting until tomorrow. I watch ESPN First Take (b/c i like it), and all the other shows, and I have heard absolutely nothing about our game. ESPN even a segment on games with playoff implications, and didn't mentioned us. I am not surprised, I am just wondering if anyone has heard of anything coming up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there a game coming up?

I said it last week, because it's the Panthers, our lack of respect rubs off on other teams. They hardly talked about the Saints game or the Falcon game. But before and after those games they slurp all over those teams. But not during the week of the game. I can't believe you haven't gotten used to the lack of coverage of a Panther game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are among the most hated teams in the league. Our team made it to the NFC Championship game in the 2nd year of team franchise in 96, then we went to the SB in year 10 in 2003. We also went back to the NFC Championship in 2005 vs seahawks. Our team in 15 years has done more then Lions and bengels combine. NFL are just jealous of us on how much we have done in 15 years. Thats why during games announcers seem to want other teams to beat us the way they only talk good about other teams when we play them. Just pure jealous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there a game coming up?

I said it last week, because it's the Panthers, our lack of respect rubs off on other teams. They hardly talked about the Saints game or the Falcon game. But before and after those games they slurp all over those teams. But not during the week of the game. I can't believe you haven't gotten used to the lack of coverage of a Panther game.

This is what I've realized over the last couple of years. If your team doesn't have good QB play, you won't get much media coverage. The Falcons stopped getting respect ever since Matt Ryan started sucking it up. Just look at the team, their QB, and how much national coverage they get.

Pats, Brady

Colts, Manning

Steelers, Roethlisberger

Eagles, McNabb

Cowboys, Romo

Saints, Brees

Chargers, Rivers

Giants, Manning

Cardinals, Warner

Vikings, Favre

Packers, Rodgers

And honestly, those are the teams that are covered the most. And the 1 thing they have in common is good QB play. That's all it comes down to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or are they just waiting until tomorrow. I watch ESPN First Take (b/c i like it), and all the other shows, and I have heard absolutely nothing about our game. ESPN even a segment on games with playoff implications, and didn't mentioned us. I am not surprised, I am just wondering if anyone has heard of anything coming up?

There are too many teams in front of us in the Playoff race for us to even get a look...and to be fair I heard next to nothing about Monday's Browns/Ravens game. A small market team versus a crappy team, not even local radio talked about it much today. They opened the Buck/Frank show talking about college basketball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...