Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule blames the D when asked about offensive struggles


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

20 hours ago, MechaZain said:

He’ll get a shot with a new OC before that happens. Rhule and Snow have worked together for years. Brady is the third wheel and will be the first one cut loose if Tepper demands blood.

That's a good point but TBH I don't see Tepper talking anything about blood when he clearly laid out a 5 year plan and I for one am going to take him on that. If a firing happens it'd be because Rhule made the call within that time frame.

Tepper came from the Steelers and they keep coaches long term. That may have been missed by our fanbase and is something to keep in mind going forward. I doubt we see the coaching carousel here. 
Granted we don't know for sure how he is in that regard but its the little we have to go off of when thinking about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/11/2021 at 9:40 PM, Luciu5 said:

Did the defense allow the Eagles to take the lead?  Did the defense stop the Eagles on their final scoring drive?

Answer "yes" or "no".

 

You won't.

Defense played lights out, but it's fair to say they have blame.  Also if you watched the press conference, he clearly did not want the defensive players thinking it's the offense at fault.  He doesn't want an offense/defense rift in the locker room. 

It's a team.  They all win or they all lose.  The defense did not lose less than the offense. 

That's the message Matt Rhule was conveying.  He went into detail.  You either have to be mentally less capable or purposely spinning to not see how his answers were framed in regards to those questions.

I don't blame the defense literally at all. I don't think Rhule is actually blaming the defense for the loss either.  They let up one really big play and they were on the field all day. This was on the hr offense not putting up points.

Hee gave a response about his philosophy. It was a media response question. I don't care what he says in media presser because it's going to be mostly media responses. 

Youre making an entire argument pounding your chest and yelling from the rooftops making a conspiracy from this, when yes you have a lot of valid things to be upset about the past two weeks but this press conference being one of them is literally clown shoes.

This was question the media asks, Rhule answers it, media takes it out of context after a few tweets spin it weird (follow his Twitter to stay up to date!).

Was Donte out of place on those read options? Probably. Did it cost us the game? Technically but no one is saying the game being an L is solely on that. Literally no one.

Edited by Rags
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rags said:

Well more like they were out there more than they should've been.

This is the Eagle drive times. Overall we had TOP +11

 

If people are trying to say the defense was anywhere near tired or on the field too much I don' think they're saying what they think they're saying. Be in some poo if so

pve.PNG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Fox007 said:

This is the Eagle drive times. Overall we had TOP +11

 

If people are trying to say the defense was anywhere near tired or on the field too much I don' think they're saying what they think they're saying. Be in some poo if so

pve.PNG

You're right on this. I guess it felt like more just due to how little we moved the ball, but even then the snap count total was still in our favor.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think it's strange that you still can't see where I'm coming from, and I guarantee you don't have more faith in him than I do.  You're looking at him in a vacuum, not about the team around him and the likely offensive game plans this season. We're going to be a run first team with 3 receiving options better than any of the other players on past rookie 1k seasons. If you can't understand that, then it's a you problem, not a me problem. Arizona's previous basketball coach, Sean Miller, used to do something at the first team meeting of every season and I think it's soooooooooo applicable to this situation. He'd have every player right down how many minutes/points they expected to average that season and then he'd add them up.  It would show that if they all hit those numbers, we'd score like 125 points a game and need to be playing 7 guys at a time to get their minutes. That's pretty much how you guys are putting your T-Mac expectations out there, looking solely at the player and what you think he should be able to do, not how the offense will operate as a whole. Every yard one player gets is one less yard someone else can get.  It sounds like I just have more faith in Thielen, XL, and Coker this year than most everyone else.  But a big reason for that faith is because of T-Mac and how much he'll open things up for the rest of them and Bryce being the type of QB to take the open easy passes than force it to his #1. As I've said, if any one of the following happens... Thielen ends the season sub 700 yards, XL or Coker end up sub 500 yards... Then yes, I will then shift my expectations for T-Mac's rookie year to be at least 1,000 yard season. But since I have faith in those other 3 having solid seasons, it tempers my expectations yardage totals for T-Mac this year, and this year alone.  I've also clearly stated many times that I think he's going to reach 10 TDs. If T-Mac ends the season with 800 yards and 10 TDs, while Thielen gets 900-1,000 and XL/Coker each get around 600, I don't see any world where that is a failure for a rookie season for T-Mac. Because again, we're talking about expectations, not what is possible.  So given the other WR options, I can't EXPECT T-Mac to get to the 1k mark, which is a far cry from me saying I don't think he can get there. Do you really not see the difference there?  
    • I don't recall anyone seeing this coming.  I mean, two seperate things for me.  I thought BB just might not work in college football because he is old grumpy man and college is about appealing to young kids.   So yeah, that could of gone great or horrible.  Coin flip.  This isn't that convo for me.  what we are witnessing right now play out.....this was never part of the disaster possibility/path discussed lol.  Really weird stuff.  Or maybe I missed the part where UNC hires a 20 year old "girlfriend" that apparently runs the Bill operation and before the season even starts is taking over more than just Bill but influence of the entire UNC operation.  That was her getting that official statement made today.  It was her sabotaging the Hard Knocks UNC show because she somehow wasn't the star.  Seems like elder abuse lol.  Only largely kidding.  You even got Charles Barkley saying he normally doesn't talk about personal lives of his friends but he might have to check in on Bill because this ain't normal stuff lol.  Anyway, it's entertaining.  Everything is a cartoon it seems these days.   
    • I think its strange how you were claiming this guy was the second coming of Mike Evans and you can't even get behind 1k yards? I guess I have more faith in him than you
×
×
  • Create New...