Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

DAVID TEPPER: WHY WILL NEXT YEAR BE DIFFERENT IF YOU KEEP MATT RHULE???


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Well, maybe he's seeing that he was the dumbass in that scenario. It happens. We're all dumbasses occasionally. What separates the dyed in the wool dumbasses from the occasional dumbasses is largely the ability to recognize when you were being a dumbass.

Which is why holding onto Rhule regardless of whatever else takes place this offseason is discouraging...  starting to feel like he's one of those dyed in the wool dumbasses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

I'd be interested to know the dynamics there, for sure.  Because Tomlin has remained while continuing to win, and they consistently excel on roster building and talent acquisition and development. 

It's been cited as a reason why he's only signed one year extensions over the last few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Which is why holding onto Rhule regardless of whatever else takes place this offseason is discouraging...  starting to feel like he's one of those dyed in the wool dumbasses.

Yep. Look, we're all ignorant when it comes to the entirety of human knowledge. We live in a very specialized society. Your scope of knowledge of everything is going to be pretty narrow. There's no shame in not having the knowledge to build a good NFL football organization. I almost certainly couldn't either. The smart folks are willing to admit what they don't know and seek out the folks who can help them out there. I can do a lot around the house, but if we're fuging around with an electrical issue involving busting into the main panel, trust and believe I'm breaking down and calling a licensed electrician for that one.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yep. Look, we're all ignorant when it comes to the entirety of human knowledge. We live in a very specialized society. Your scope of knowledge of everything is going to be pretty narrow. There's no shame in not having the knowledge to build a good NFL football organization. I almost certainly couldn't either. The smart folks are willing to admit what they don't know and seek out the folks who can help them out there. I can do a lot around the house, but if we fuging around with an electrical issue involving busing into the main panel, trust and believe I'm breaking down and calling a licensed electrician for that one.

Perfectly stated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is a good take it really is to the point dc needs to let the world see the real byoung b/c right now everyone in the media and tepper has had blinders on when it comes to young.  Its hard to even know where the panthers are at skill player wise with such horrible qb play.  I doubt it but legette may be a probowl wr he just cant throw the ball and catch it.  I am just so sick of every excuse in the book for byoung.  LIstened to a podcast and the guy was going over how many different options byoung had on the int and all of them were ok except for the one where he threw an int.  He said the play could be run by a hs qb and they would typically make a good decision. 
    • I certainly have my complaints about Canales but I'm not ready to fire him yet for a couple of reasons. First and foremost, Tepper has made this one of the least appealing jobs in the league. Morgan and Canales are here to begin with in large part because guys higher on the wish list take other jobs. If you fire Canales you're gonna end up replacing him with another third tier candidate who wasn't being seriously considered by other teams with openings. That's just the reality of the situation right now as far as I can tell. Secondly, despite plenty of room for critique, we are 6-6 despite the worst QB play in the league. That's really damn hard to pull off in the modern NFL. Especially when your D isn't dominant. Our D is greatly improved but is still a slightly below average overall defense ranking 18th in yards per game allowed and 20th in points allowed. Going 6-6 with atrocious QB play and slightly below average defensive play is pretty damn impressive. Even more impressive when you also factor in that we're in the red on turnovers differential at -3. When you combine league worst QB play with slightly below average D and negative turnover differential honestly you'd expect to be in play for the #1 overall pick, not 6-6 and having just played a game that a win would have you leading the division. So yeah, even though I'm far from sold I advocate for patience with Canales for the time being. If you ask me if I'm bringing him back next year, I'm a yes barring a catastrophic meltdown down the stretch which admittedly is very much a possibility.
×
×
  • Create New...