Matt Corral is here because of Ben McAdoo

[MasterAwesome]

14 minutes ago, CRA said:

Sam Darnold can be a bad at his job.  He can ALSO be used as a scapegoat at the same time.  Which he was and is. It's the whole two things can be true or apply concept. 

Sam Darnold was a problem here.  He wasn't the reason THE reason the offense sucked.   So the other reasons have to get their fair share of the attention because they are in reality are bigger factors.

When a Rhule defender brings up and gets hyper focused on Sam Darnold, they are generally using him as a tool to deflect away from the major factor (and bigger one) that Matt Rhule was in regards to what our pathetic offense. 

and the other problems are still here.  They deserve the focus.  Not Darnold. 

Again.....your entire rationale about Brady could be applied towards Sam Darnold.  Except not only do you not trip over yourself to rush in and defend Darnold anytime a criticism is levied towards him as you do for Brady, but you actively participate in the trashing of Darnold.  Possibly more than anyone else.  Are you or are you not deflecting blame from Rhule every single time you trash Darnold? I think Darnold deserves a ton of blame for our offense so don't misconstrue this as me defending Darnold, I'm instead trying to understand your argument.  You're saying one thing but your pattern of behavior prove the complete opposite.

I'm simply asking you what's the difference between the treatment of Brady vs. the treatment of Darnold...which you conveniently ignored entirely, just to continue to grandstand about how badly Joe Brady is wronged.  You didn't mention Darnold once in your entire response to me asking you how you draw a distinction between Darnold/Brady scapegoating.  Oh actually I know the difference between the two: the amount of Joe Brady criticism is about 0.000000001% of the amount of Darnold criticism.  Seriously, how often is Brady even mentioned on these boards?  Once every 2 months?  Why overblow this so badly?

There....since you're clearly having a tough time answering my question, I went through your own post and switched out "Joe Brady" for "Sam Darnold".  Does your post still hold true or not?  If so, why do you spend 75% of your posts on here trashing Darnold when he is only a small part of the problem and does not deserve the focus (your words)? If not, can you explain the difference?

[CRA]

11 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

Again.....your entire rationale about Brady could be applied towards Sam Darnold.  Except not only do you not trip over yourself to rush in and defend Darnold anytime a criticism is levied towards him as you do for Brady, but you actively participate in the trashing of Darnold.  Possibly more than anyone else.  Are you or are you not deflecting blame from Rhule every single time you trash Darnold? I think Darnold deserves a ton of blame for our offense so don't misconstrue this as me defending Darnold, I'm instead trying to understand your argument.  You're saying one thing but your pattern of behavior prove the complete opposite.

I'm simply asking you what's the difference between the treatment of Brady vs. the treatment of Darnold...which you conveniently ignored entirely, just to continue to grandstand about how badly Joe Brady is wronged.  You didn't mention Darnold once in your entire response to me asking you how you draw a distinction between Darnold/Brady scapegoating.  Oh actually I know the difference between the two: the amount of Joe Brady criticism is about 0.000000001% of the amount of Darnold criticism.  Seriously, how often is Brady even mentioned on these boards?  Once every 2 months?  Why overblow this so badly?

There....since you're clearly having a tough time answering my question, I went through your own post and switched out "Joe Brady" for "Sam Darnold".  Does your post still hold true or not?  If so, why do you spend 75% of your posts on here trashing Darnold when he is only a small part of the problem and does not deserve the focus (your words)? If not, can you explain the difference?

Apply it to Sam Darnold.   Sam Darnold isn’t the biggest issue. 

Biggest issue is a HC that traded away our draft capital for the worst starting QB in the NFL.  

Matt Rhule and Sam Darnold are still here.  Joe Brady isn’t.   So yeah, Joe Brady doesn’t get the same smoke.   The people here do.  Who also happened to be more impactful as to why we sucked on O.