Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Boston vs Canes Game 3 Friday 7pm


Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

I don’t know what was going on with the ice last night either. Everyone was slipping and sliding, the puck was bouncing like crazy. We didn’t have the speed we had in Carolina until the end of the game. I’m guessing boston turned it up a degree or so to fug with us. 
 

Just a weird night, even the ice crew took down a linesman at some point when they were on to patch it. 

I'd like to blame it on the ice...but Boston played on the same ice. Although I do agree there were a ton weird bounces... Canes just looked a step behind. Their top line had space they didn't have in PNC. Can't give the rat and his cohorts room to work. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, panthers81 said:

I'd like to blame it on the ice...but Boston played on the same ice. Although I do agree there were a ton weird bounces... Canes just looked a step behind. Their top line had space they didn't have in PNC. Can't give the rat and his cohorts room to work. 

Agreed 100% on this. Carolina just didn't have it after the first period. 

We literally helped their stars into playing well. The sad thing is, our awful PP as it's been for the better part of the 2nd half of the year showed up in a bad way. It was to the point, where I thought we would be better off rejecting penalties. Reminded me a lot of the Canes PP back in 2019 when we got swept by Boston. Not a good sighting.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, panthers81 said:

I'd like to blame it on the ice...but Boston played on the same ice. Although I do agree there were a ton weird bounces... Canes just looked a step behind. Their top line had space they didn't have in PNC. Can't give the rat and his cohorts room to work. 

Boston was also falling down like crazy. Just not to the extent we we’re. 

Edited by Harbingers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Boston was also falling down like crazy. Just not to the extent we we’re. 

Don't like using another teams ice as an excuse, when it didn't seem to hinder Boston. 

In the end, after the first period being absolutely horrific on the PP doomed Carolina. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, panthers81 said:

I'd like to blame it on the ice...but Boston played on the same ice. Although I do agree there were a ton weird bounces... Canes just looked a step behind. Their top line had space they didn't have in PNC. Can't give the rat and his cohorts room to work. 

You do know that you answered the question in your own statement? We can control the matchups at PNC.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://nfltraderumors.co/2026-nfl-draft-grades-for-all-32-teams/      Grade: B+ Best Pick: Sam Hecht Biggest Reach (consensus rank): Jackson Kuwatch (NR) It's easy to love what Carolina did. The Panthers traded four times but ended the draft with the same number of selections that they started with and in approximately the same ranges. They did not take a player ahead of the consensus until Kuwatch at No. 227, and it's easy to see how he fell through the cracks playing at Miami of Ohio. He's a high-end athlete, though, and has a chance to develop, which is a fine profile for a seventh-rounder. Freeling and Brazzell also checked the high-end athleticism upside boxes for the Panthers. Carolina let the board come to them in the first round and could have a long-term solution at left tackle, which is a hard position to fill. Brazzell slid because of some maturity concerns as well as the difficulty in projecting receivers from Tennessee's Mickey Mouse offense. At 6-4, 200 pounds and 4.37 in the 40, though, the upside is undeniable. On top of that, the landed three starters on Day 3. Normally that's a high and unrealistic bar, but Hecht and Wheatley were both firmly inside the top 100 on the consensus board and have paths to win starting competitions. Lee fits the scheme well and has some interesting traits as an outside corner. What stopped me from a full-out A grade is not loving the Hunter pick, though he does fill a need to replace DT A'Shawn Robinson. There were prospects at other needs positions I would have been more jazzed about. The Brazzell pick is also an interesting risk for a team that's still in building mode, even coming off an NFC South title. Still, I'm nitpicking
    • I was just a teenager when I joined in 2013. I've loved the many opinions on this forum, even though several are infuriating. I've had several bad takes, myself,  that I've hopefully grown out of over the years.
    • i have not watched many gt games.  is it his accuracy that hurt his draft stock his armstrength or all of the above?
×
×
  • Create New...