Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Re: Last year's defense


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Mage said:

Panthers allowed the 8th fewest first downs in the NFL and led the league in shortest number of plays per drive allowed.  

"Wasn't a good defense"

Panthers allowed almost 30 points a game to some of the worst teams in the league.

"Man, what a dominant defense" 😆

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

As well thought out a response as I'd expect from you.

Let me know the next time people are up for celebrating a 5-12 season because "Hey, we had damn good stats!"

Bro, what kind of dumbass logic is this?  Nobody is celebrating a 5-12 season

This is why talking to you is so infuriating lol. You change goal-posts constantly.  You do realize you can both be unsatisfied with the performance of the overall team and yet still acknowledge the defense was good, right?  

The Panthers gave up a lot of leads primarily because the offense was hot garbage.  Was the defense perfect?  No, of course not, but they were good enough for the Panthers to contend for the playoffs had the offense been above average.  Just because they couldn't will the team to the postseason like the freakin' 00 Ravens doesn't make them bad, and the fact that you would try to create that parallel is exactly the kind of idiocy I would expect from you.

And honestly, I have no problem calling you out in the manner that I am because you consistently belittle others on this site.  

Edited by Mage
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Panthers allowed almost 30 points a game to some of the worst teams in the league.

"Man, what a dominant defense" 😆

You are such an idiot.  Here you go twisting words again.  Am I the only one around here who notices how much you consistently do this?

Please show me one post, just one, where I referred to the Panthers defense as dominant.  When have I ever made that assertion? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mage said:

You do realize you can both be unsatisfied with the performance of the overall team and yet still acknowledge the defense was good, right?  

No problem at all, if the defense was actually good.

It wasn't...at all.

As others have said, good players, lousy coaching. Snow's schemes got figured out about three games in after he'd feasted on some lousy offenses. From that point on, even sh-t offenses like the Giants could put up big points on us.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

From that point on, even sh-t offenses like the Giants could put up big points on us.

What an absurd statement. 

Giants didn't score their first touchdown until there was 59 seconds left in the 3rd quarter.  The only other touchdown they was scored was late in the 4th after the Panthers turned the ball over on downs on their own 18 yard line.  They also had a 53 yard field goal gifted to them after the Panthers punted and gave them the ball on their own 46 yard line.  Giants only needed 19 yards that drive to get into field goal range.  

Panthers that game had 12 drives on offense.  1 ended in a safety.  1 ended in an interception. 2 ended in turnovers on downs.  7 ended in punts, including an astonishing 3 and outs.  

But yeah, the Giants offense "put up big points on us."

I mean seriously dude, out of all 17 games, it was that game you tried to use to slam the defense lol?  

Edited by Mage
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mage said:

What an absurd statement. 

Giants didn't score their first touchdown until there was 59 seconds left in the 3rd quarter.  The only other touchdown they was scored was late in the 4th after the Panthers turned the ball over on downs on their own 18 yard line.  They also had a 53 yard field goal gifted to them after the Panthers punted and gave them the ball on their own 46 yard line.  Giants only needed 19 yards that drive to get into field goal range.  

Panthers that game had 12 drives on offense.  1 ended in a safety.  1 ended in an interception. 2 ended in turnovers on downs.  7 ended in punts, including an astonishing [b]6[/b] 3 and outs.  

But yeah, the Giants offense "put up big points on us."

I mean seriously dude, out of all 17 games, it was that game you tried to use to slam the defense lol?  

That the Giants are one of several I could have chosen shows how much you're reaching to try to defend this argument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

That the Giants are one of several I could have chosen shows how much you're reaching to try to defend this argument.

But the Giants isn't true.  The defense wasn't at fault that game.  And I literally just showed you why.  So no, they aren't "one of several."  

But give it a shot. Explain to us how the defense was the problem that game.  I would LOVE to hear that argument.
 

All you do is spout BS.  The only one who is reaching here is you, considering you have twisted my words on at least two occasions already in this thread.  So if I am reaching, then go ahead.  Tell me how the Giants offense put up "big points" on the defense and why it was the defenses fault.  I gave you reasons why I didn't think it was on the defense and predictably, you didn't respond to any of them. So if I am reaching, then it should be pretty easy for you to counter, right?

Also, why didn't you respond to me asking you for when I referred to the defense as dominant?  Since you aren't reaching and I am, it should be pretty easy for you to find where I called them dominant or even great, right?

Edited by Mage
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mage said:

But the Giants isn't true.  The defense wasn't at fault that game.  And I literally just showed you why.  So no, they aren't "one of several."  

But give it a shot. Explain to us how the defense was the problem that game.  I would LOVE to hear that argument.
 

All you do is spout BS.  The only one who is reaching here is you, considering you have twisted my words on at least two occasions already in this thread.  So if I am reaching, then go ahead.  Tell me how the Giants offense put up "big points" on the defense and why it was the defenses fault.  I gave you reasons why I didn't think it was on the defense and predictably, you didn't respond to any of them. So if I am reaching, then it should be pretty easy for you to counter, right?

Also, why didn't you respond to me asking you for when I referred to the defense as dominant?  Since you aren't reaching and I am, it should be pretty easy for you to find where I called them dominant or even great, right?

"2000 Ravens defense would have won it"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mage said:

But the Giants isn't true.  The defense wasn't at fault that game.  And I literally just showed you why.

But give it a shot. Explain to us how the defense was the problem that game.  I would LOVE to hear that argument.

All you do is spout BS.  The only one who is reaching here is you, considering you have twisted my words on at least two occasions already in this thread.  So if I am reaching, then go ahead.  Tell me how the Giants offense put up "big points" on the defense and why it was the defenses fault.  I gave you reasons why I didn't think it was on the defense and predictably, you didn't respond to any of them. So if I am reaching, then it should be pretty easy for you to counter, right?

I'll actually turn the challenge back your way.

As mentioned, the Giants are just one example. If your argument that the defense was actually good is true, you should be able to show multiple examples of why it wasn't their fault they gave up nearly 300 points to both bad and good teams over the last 12 games or so.

If you can accomplish that, then I'll review the Giants game as you wish.

Up for the challenge?

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'll actually turn the challenge back your way.

As mentioned, the Giants are just one example. If your argument that the defense was actually good is true, you should be able to show multiple examples of why it wasn't their fault they gave up nearly 300 points to both bad and good teams over the last 12 games or so.

If you can accomplish that, then I'll review the Giants game as you wish.

LMAO

Is this not the biggest cop-out ever seen on the forum? Guy makes a statement, gets called out for how BS it was, and then instead of admitting he was wrong, tells me that I have to explain and defend 12 games all for him to defend 1 (which he probably won't do anyway). 

You are hilarious, dude. Never change.

Edited by Mage
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mage said:

LMAO

Is this not the biggest cop-out ever seen on the forum? Guy makes a statement, gets called out for how BS it was, and then instead of admitting he was wrong, tells me that I have to explain and defend 12 games all for him to defend 1 (which he probably won't do anyway). 

You are hilarious, dude. Never change.

I don't plan to change 😁

But the two reasons I made the challenge are 1) You're trying to use a single example to ignore the larger picture, thus when asked to expand your focus the "cop out" is on your part because you know once you look at other games, the argument is going to fall flat.

And 2) I'm currently following Lady Cowboy Fan around Sam's Club, so not in a position to do anything in-depth, but maybe later 😆

Of course, that depends on your answer 😎

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This stat explains the OP stat.

Expecting a D to stop all scoring, shows a lack of understanding of how football works.

Anyone who came away from watching our games and said we lost because of our D, must have slept through the 2nd and 3rd quarter.

Edited by poundaway
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A dome is NOT part of the plans. They are building a training facility, a 5000 seat “stadium” in the training facility, a team HQ and a hotel, along with improvements to the stadium.
    • you're conflating different things here. the performance of different parts of the team between 2022 and 2023 is a separate issue. I think a generally overlooked component is how bryce's poor play impacted the line play, but that's a different topic. we can't say he scammed professional "all over the league" because no other teams were given the right to draft him. All teams lie about who they're going to draft, or who they did draft. Obviously not every team gets the player who was at the top of their board etc. And obviously if the entire draft thinks a team is going to take someone like bryce at 1, who they don't think can play, they're going to leak like hell that he's the top qb on the board to shift every player down one spot. I'm not saying this happened, but I don't see any reason to believe league officials all over were sold on bryce. whispers from anonymous sources and ESPN reporting doesn't mean a thing to me. Bryce himself isn't a scam artist. He's just a kid whos path was set before him who was always surrounded by coaches and players who were better than everyone else. Maybe he's a super nice guy too I dunno. if you want to attribute it to a single person or entity, i guess the alabama hype machine or the draft process would be what you want. the bama hype machine is absolutely a real thing, and they have very close ties to the networks, especially cbs. Saban is/was incredibly powerful in the football world, and we know for a fact he tries to get his players drafted as high as possible to use as a recruiting tool. the other is the networks that have to put on like 3 months of coverage about nothing and there's nothing better than "what qb goes at 1" because that's easy to understand for the lay person and it involves the two biggest schools in college football. let me ask a different question. when tepper was watching nfl draft stuff or reading insider info on what qb was going to be better, who do you think tepper thought the audience was supposed to be? we'll never know exactly why the panthers suddenly switched from seemingly all in on CJ to Bryce. people are going to say we never knew they were going CJ, but the same analysts and insiders who all suddenly said in lock step the panthers were taking bryce were saying the same thing about CJ before <whatever> happened. I mean poo Benjamin Albright, who for some reason knows a ton about the Panthers, said this in JANUARY... https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2023/01/26/panthers-cj-stroud-trade-2023-nfl-draft-apple-of-eye/ That's what I mean by scam. Tepper, and by extension the Panthers fans, were scammed by a huge process that Our Special Boy let go to his head because he saw himself as an audience of one. He took seriously a process and spectacle that was just meant to keep eyes on the tv in the months before the draft, despite Bryce's obvious, glaring shortcomings. No one is saying Bryce wasn't put into a bad situation, I just don't think it would have mattered and I didn't see a single thing to suggest otherwise. The second he showed up to the combine in a fat kid sweater he should have been off the board. And calling Ryan Leaf a scam artist isn't fair at all. He went to the worst situation in football, got hurt, became addicted to pain killers (which almost definitely led to harder drugs) and spiraled. Especially given what we now know about the Chargers team doctors....
    • They need to take a look at the State funding a school receives.  If you have a kid at one of these football schools many times all of the money is flowing into athletics and athletic facilities while the regular student dorms are falling apart and many academic buildings are in bad shape, but check out that new and even bigger jumbotron.  If the schools start paying, any state funding going toward their scholarships should be removed.  I don't agree with our tax dollars paying college athletes.  Let that money come from boosters and endorsements.  
×
×
  • Create New...