Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Was Rhule worse than Seifert?


Who was worse  

69 members have voted

  1. 1. .

    • George Seifert
      11
    • Matt Rhule
      58


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Why did you come at me stating you had stats to prove that 2010 and 2022 were worse than 2001? When now your comment is basicaly is just conjecture? I dont understand the premise of doing that.....

I came at you because you will not admit that Rhules tenure was worse than any other HC we have had. Admit that and we good. Fair? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Snake said:

I came at you because you will not admit that Rhules tenure was worse than any other HC we have had. Admit that and we good. Fair? 

I dont why my opinion matters so much to you. Ive always thought you and I have gotten along well here on the huddle, but it appears I have triggered somehow and I do apologize. I try to use data as much as possibe for many of my conversations here. Seifert is someone not only statisitcally was bad here, but ruined my childhood fandom as well.  So there is a mix here.

Edited by TheCasillas
so many typos
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

I dont why my opinion matters so much to you. Ive always thought you and I have gotten along well here on the huddle, but it appears I have triggered somehow and I do apologize. I try to use data as much as possibe for many of my conversations here. Seifert is someone not only statisitcally was bad here, but ruined my childhood fandom as well.  So there is a mix here.

It's not that it matters but why back Rhule? Every sign says he is the worst HC ever. I get 2001 we were mostly young but hell we have less time on this earth now. We need a good coach even more now and maybe one SB in our lifetime. 🤷‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Snake said:

It's not that it matters but why back Rhule? Every sign says he is the worst HC ever. I get 2001 we were mostly young but hell we have less time on this earth now. We need a good coach even more now and maybe one SB in our lifetime. 🤷‍♂️

The way you feel about Rhule, is the way I feel about Seifert. They both sucked as Panthers HC. They both made IDENTICAL mistakes. I am ready to move on from Rhule, as I have shared for the last couple of months. 

I am ready for a good coach. I hope Tepper hires some pros to come help find our next HC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

The way you feel about Rhule, is the way I feel about Seifert. They both sucked as Panthers HC. They both made IDENTICAL mistakes. I am ready to move on from Rhule, as I have shared for the last couple of months. 

I am ready for a good coach. I hope Tepper hires some pros to come help find our next HC.

Well that's something we can both agree on. 🍻

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
×
×
  • Create New...