Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would you preferred Ben Navarro bought Panthers in 2018 ?


Chris Smitty
 Share

Recommended Posts

I don't begrudge Tepper's billions, almost all billionaires money was gotten via someone else's money or sweat [old money & new money]. I do question his ignoring history in his football decisions. Coming in with experience from the part ownership of the Steelers, he ignored the fact that they had GMs that were in the better half of the NFL. Firing Riveria & keeping Hurley belied the fact that RR had some modest success  with both Hurley & Gettleman. Hurley should have been replaced in the first month after buying team. I am not saying he should have kept RR, but relying on Hurley with his history of non-success is questionable at best. Could he have fixed RR's flaw of over-loyalty  to some people despite their short-comings?                    If you recall prior to the first draft under Tepper, he in public stated that the draft should be D-line, O-line, & back-up QB. Of course Hurley [as the perfect yes-man] did exactly that. Burns in the first, [continuing his first round good-fortune], Little in the second [trading up to over-draft what should have been at best a late 3rd or 4th rounder], & Grier in the 3rd [a UDFA at best despite having two what has been proven to be two of the better back-ups on the roster [Allen & Heinke]]. The last thing as an owner you need is a GM or HC who runs a team that agrees and acts by what you want not what is best for the team. Tepper should have seen Hurley's yes-man antics & fired Hurley the first day after the draft.                                                   Then he piled on more bad decisions by hiring Rhule, giving him a huge contract, & total control over the team. You can count on one hand how many times this worked in the past 30yrs [college coach, contract, or control [take your pick].                                                                                                                                      There's on old adage: you don't give a $20 hooker a C-spot because she talks about how big you are [Hurley] or propose to her because she convinces you how good you are in the bedroom [Rhule]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've seen enough tape review to see that we run crossers...we have dudes in the middle of the field. I have to think that this is a harder area for someone of Bryce's stature to hit. You have to see directly over the center of the line and is probably where the most interceptions happen (he has thrown a LOT of his picks by not seeing a dude in the middle of the field).
    • I’m pretty sure we did end up getting the first in that drive, but I don’t remember. It was obviously a catch the ball didn’t move 
    • While I don't think NFL games are fully rigged, it's certainly closer to a scripted outcome than we all think. The NFL by their own admission in court is not a fair and balanced sporting event. It is a managed entertainment product, a "spectacle" as they've put it, that now has sports betting as a huge financial pillar of their business model. It's ridicuously naive to still think the NFL isn't using referees to manage the games towards certain outcomes, using "replays in the booth" and overturning calls, choosing to overlook penalties at critical moments and calling questionable and sometimes phantom game changing penalties at other critical junctures of games. The NFL has always done this going as far back as the '60s, and they were investigated by the FBI in the '70s which found a large number of ownership groups had ties to the mob. So when the overwhelming majority of the moneyline bets were on the Panthers vs the Saints last week, and suddenly we see some strange and ticky tack penalties we've rarely seen called on the Panthers all year, I just know there's more going on behind the scenes. And suddenly next week, the Panthers will probably be nudged to a win, to keep the NFC South race interesting, as I see the Bucs are the favorite as of now and most moneyline bets will trend towards the Bucs until during the game when the Bucs are leading heading into the 4th quarter, and the Panthers are nudged to a win. At least, that's what the NFL and Vegas probably want to happen. 
×
×
  • Create New...