Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Matt Moore Plays Well The Rest Of The Season


Hayden Panettiere

Recommended Posts

"Well" is a matter of perspective. It would seem like fans would be tired of slightly above average QBs whose throws have the accuracy and effectiveness of a Silkworm missile.

I will judge Moore's performance on his decision making (including throwing the darn ball out of bounds), effective mobility (not happy feet), and ability to put the ball on target (especially from the pocket).

I refuse to be fooled by smoke and mirrors. Now, looking at the remainder of our schedule, it appears as though Moore is not going to be able to hide behind the success of Williams and Stewart, so we should be able to see exactly what he has. If he seems like he has the ability to put up a few 300 yard performances during a given year without turning the ball over, then I may lose my skepticism. A pure pocket passer who can put a team on his shoulders when warranted is at the very top of my checklist (with a verified threat at WR opposite of Smith not far behind). If Moore is that guy for the rest of the season, then great. But he's going to have to do a helluva lot better than what I saw of him in 2007 (and raise his game above the likes of McCown or Feeley), before I'll be satisfied.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...