Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Moore IS a better option than Jake.


PuntJake

Recommended Posts

Ive actually met Rodney before. Very cool fellow indeed. Tell Rodney for me to tell the Panthers they need to start drafting & giving young black QBs a chance like they gave him one. Im sure he would be all for it.

Well now you've got me all confused. In your signature, you claim the Panthers are "proudly saying no to black QBs since 1995" which comes off as really goddamn racist. And now you're talking about needing to give young black QBs a chance.

Hell, maybe I just need to leave work and go home to sleep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Signature makes no sense - Pete played well after 1995 :P

RE: this topic, Jake was the first person to go to Moore's side and congratulate him after the first drive, and he was supposedly very supportive during the game. Jake WANTS Moore to succeed. Jake wants this team to win. Yes, he was upset on the sidelines at times - but not at Moore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's give Moore another game before passing judgement on his abilities. He got a boring win against a 1-10 team.

Next week will be a better test. If he can make it interesting at least, I'll be happy. If not, he may show that the problem doesn't start at the QB position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that if he STARTS next week against NE in Foxboro, it'll tell us alot more about #3 then we saw today.

IMO, having a bad game in a hostile cold enviroment will not tell us anymore than the game today did. Have to judge a Quarterback on his body of work, not on any single game. He could have four int's next week, and that would not mean a whole lot to me. In fact, how he would bounce back from such a game would mean more than that game itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...