Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

would you trade jonathan stewart...


Fiz

Recommended Posts

absolutely not. Don't trade Stewart. Besides, you're giving up terrible value for a low cost high value player who's already successful here. Trading top 20 picks away is never a good sign, and that's because no one does it unless the player is a failure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stewart just showed he was a franchise back today. No way do you trade him. Personally I think its possible that if any back gets traded it will be Deangelo simply because:

1. Age

2. Will cost more than Jstew

3. Has alot of value

As much as I would hate to see any of our backs traded, shopping Deangelo is the logical choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stewart just showed he was a franchise back today. No way do you trade him. Personally I think its possible that if any back gets traded it will be Deangelo simply because:

1. Age

2. Will cost more than Jstew

3. Has alot of value

As much as I would hate to see any of our backs traded, shopping Deangelo is the logical choice.

yes he showed he was really franchise back caliber just like when Fred Jackson rushed for 165 against the bucs and Ahmad Bradshaw ran for 104 and Ricky Williams for 102.

Williams is the catalyst for the running game. his vision is superior, he has more speed, he's more elusive, and he can hold his own as far as power goes. Just because Stewart can get a buck twenty against a poo defense does not mean he's a great back. He has terrible performances as often as he has good ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes he showed he was really franchise back caliber just like when Fred Jackson rushed for 165 against the bucs and Ahmad Bradshaw ran for 104 and Ricky Williams for 102.

Williams is the catalyst for the running game. his vision is superior, he has more speed, he's more elusive, and he can hold his own as far as power goes. Just because Stewart can get a buck twenty against a poo defense does not mean he's a great back. He has terrible performances as often as he has good ones.

exactly. stewart is good BECAUSE of williams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes he showed he was really franchise back caliber just like when Fred Jackson rushed for 165 against the bucs and Ahmad Bradshaw ran for 104 and Ricky Williams for 102.

Williams is the catalyst for the running game. his vision is superior, he has more speed, he's more elusive, and he can hold his own as far as power goes. Just because Stewart can get a buck twenty against a poo defense does not mean he's a great back. He has terrible performances as often as he has good ones.

Well I'm gonna call bullshit on this. Stewart would easily start on other teams. I think Deangelo is the better back. But if one is going to get traded I'd be willing to bet it's Deangelo. We have arguably the deepest back field in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

absolutely not. Don't trade Stewart. Besides, you're giving up terrible value for a low cost high value player who's already successful here. Trading top 20 picks away is never a good sign, and that's because no one does it unless the player is a failure.

funny you should say that because the last time the redskins sanctioned a high-profile trade for a RB it was Champ Bailey and a second rounder

i mean if the redskins approached us with this kind of a trade and we had nothing else to reference we should go for it anyway because you know Vinny Cerrato has no fuging idea what he's doing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I'm gonna call bullshit on this. Stewart would easily start on other teams. I think Deangelo is the better back. But if one is going to get traded I'd be willing to bet it's Deangelo. We have arguably the deepest back field in the league.

yea but you don't have to be great to start at running back for a lot of teams

Stewart is just good and that's as far as he goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i don't know how good stewart is but he's not as good as deangelo

let me just put this another way, what's more valuable

jonathan stewart as a backup and tyrell sutton as the third string v. a 2nd rounder (plus a player of need) and sutton as the 2nd string

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hold up there, Campbell did absolutely nothing wrong in that game. Suisham and Sellers lost the 'Skins that game. Don't put that on Campbell. 30/42 367 yds 3 tds 1 Pic, that happened basically at the end of Regulation. Phenomenal Game.

It wasnt. They had good field position and coulda won. He threw a pick and wasn't even looking in the way he threw it. Idk if Jake woulda did that

And on top of it all, he hasn't been that good this year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

all of you seem to be little children when it comes to the idea of trading away players we drafted/not starting players we drafted

buh buh buh dan conner is gonna retwire a panfer we can't wet him sit behind diggs abloo bloo bloo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd like to see the gameday chats come back, especially if you can get it mobile compatible and like those support chats that stay on the screen even when you move around the site. We could use them during CLTFC and Hornets games now too.
    • There's a lot of truth here, but at the same time, that one year of production we might be paying for is actually paying for a development arc. And a lot of players have those. QB is the most complicated position in sports, hands down.  I'm not saying Bryce will make it past the hump this year, the odds are stacked against him just like any QB in the league that isn't already considered an elite player (and there are only about 5-8 of those at most). Arcs happen, and slow arcs happen, too. Sam Darnold seemed a wash up for the Jets and a horrible mistake. He was better with us, but still couldn't carry a bad team on his shoulders (or bad coaching). He went to Minnesota and got a shot under better coaching with more mature eyes to see the field. Something sparked and then he took his team to the Super Bowl and brought home a ring. Baker Mayfield had a similar arc, and may yet hit the big game. Hell, locally, Jake Delhomme had one. Or Bryce could flutter back down having already hit his peak. It happens. More often than any of us want to admit. We've paid for a full development arc for Bryce, but we've had it on rookie deal rates and that's been a savings that has let us build out the rest of the team, which was really needed. Maybe we end up diving back into the QB pool in the first round next season. Might be the guy, might not.  But he'll be set up with a better team that Bryce was when he started. Or maybe, just maybe, Bryce adds another seven TDs and loses four INTs on the season. Grabs three more wins and maybe a playoff win, maybe two. It's not completely impossible and that'd be great for the team and for him.  We're just going to have to tune in and see how it plays out. Probably won't be boring. 
    • I am holding out hope for a miraculous run this season. But you know the narrative around him is peak delusional when the Panthers social team can post this without even a hint of irony. Four years and almost 50 games into his career he still looks like he's never set foot in the weight room. Really?
×
×
  • Create New...