First four game comparison of so called "talented" QB's vs. Moore.

[Fox007]

Those are games started, Don't think he was throwing hail mary passes in those games. =)

Sorry that pass Joe Flacco just did just made me lose my mind.

[Jaxel]

Again they are a comparison of first four games STARTED.

[Jaxel]

Sorry that pass Joe Flacco just did just made me lose my mind.

That was an aweful pass, why would he throw that? Another pick.. ouch

[Panthers128]

i didn't like flaco's pass but his teammates weren't helping him out at all, i was screaming at the back who was just standing there while his qb was buying time

[Fox007]

That was an aweful pass, why would he throw that? Another pick.. ouch

At least I started Alex Smith over Flacco.

[TheSaint]

how does he compare to jakes 1st 4 starts this year?

[Brandon]

How about comparing him to someone in a similar situation to his. How about Tony Romo. In his first 4 starts he went 87 out of 120 for a 72.5% completion percentage. He threw for 1088 total yards which averages almost 10 yards per attempt with 5 Tds and 2 Ints. Compared to that, Moore has a big way to go. I hope Moore turns out better that Romo has been particularly in the playoffs. Assuming he can one day lead us there.

And look how Romo is regarded now... Let's face it, using Romo as a statistical sample is flawed at best and possibly bordering on intellectually dishonesty on your behalf. I'm not sure what it is you have against Matt Moore but you seem very unwilling to give him ANY credit for what he's done.

[Jaxel]

Jakes first four starts:

53 of 93 for 569 yds. 56% CMP% 2 TD 3 INT 4 W 0 L

[panthers55]

And look how Romo is regarded now... Let's face it, using Romo as a statistical sample is flawed at best and possibly bordering on intellectually dishonesty on your behalf. I'm not sure what it is you have against Matt Moore but you seem very unwilling to give him ANY credit for what he's done.

Probably because he hasn't really done much yet. I want to see him play the next 4 weeks. I think it will go a long way to determine where he is.

As for comparing him to Romo, perhaps there isn't a better comparison. Both have had time to develop and sit on the bench learning and waiting for his chance. i don't see how anyting is inteleectual dishonest. It just goes to show that despite success early, it is no guarantee of continued success. Perhaps it serves as a cautionary tale about determining overall success too early. Like people are doing already with Moore. I hope Moore surpasses everyone expectations. But I have been jaded by seeing too many guys with potential fizzle out when they actually get a chance for extended play to get too excited at this point.