Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Belichick Does His Homework On Moore


beastson

Recommended Posts

If nothing else, Moore impressed New England coach Bill Belichick, who noted Moore's constantly changing locales (UCLA, Oregon State, Dallas, Carolina in a short span) and his natural gifts.

“Good player, got a real good arm, thought he made some very accurate throws, both in the short, intermediate range and down the field,” Belichick said. “Got good zip on the ball. Athletic guy, they can move him around. They ran him on some bootlegs and he scrambled out of the pocket a few times to buy a little extra time. I thought he handled himself well, and bottom line for the quarterback for me is the win-loss record. He's played and he's won, and he's done what he needs to do to have his team in the winner's circle the end of the game, and that's what really counts in my book.

“So give him a lot of credit for the way he's played. Certainly, he's a guy who's earned everything he's got in terms of his athletic career and particularly in football. He's had to overcome a lot of adversity, in changing teams and schools and everything else. He's had an opportunity to play, and he's played well and I really admire that.”

Hmmm....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

flattery...

remember when Gruden said last year that our defense was "scary" or something like that and then we come out and lose 27-3.

What's he gonna say? Moore sucks and we have no respect for him?

Actually, I do think Belichick is sincere, but honestly, you substitute any young QBs name in there, and it rings just as true...

blanket statement...we cetainly know a lot about that from Foxy, although I certainly would prefer a coach who knows what NOT to say to one that spouts off...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think he honestly saw those good things about him. i don't doubt that belichick watched every bit of tape he could get on him to prepare for the game. that's what he does for every opponent.

still....i won't read too much into it. unless you are rex ryan, coaches will say good things about their opponents and players when they are asked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly the only thing that I like more about Matt Moore than Jake Delhomme is that he looks athletic when he throws the ball and his arm is stronger. Other than that...ehh. Pretty sure that if you asked Belichick he would say the same thing. As far as QB IQ...I'd say that they are both below average.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bellichick is covering his bases for when Moore makes the Pats look bad Sunday. Not because I think Moore is that good but NE pass D is horrible.

Also, more than anything, he is subconsiencely (?) stroking his own ego in advance. If NE wins on Sunday Bellichick looks a lot better beating a team he talked up instead of beating a team he trashed. All coaches do this and the main reason is to make themselves look/feel better when/if they win or to make themselves not look as bad when/if they lose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • looks like I was wrong on that going off memory.  It was one of a couple stats I looked at the other week.  Looks like I confused that league worst with the bad target %, yac per comp, etc stats I looked up.  Where he was league worst.  I still think solving the YAC and short pass game is the best way to maximize Bryce.  He might of thrown deep a lot.....but he has never been a good deep thrower.  Outside of PFF declaring it with what ifs. 
    • If those are T-Mac's first 2 seasons, then yes, our fans will be calling him a bust for sure.  But raw stats after the fact don't tell the full story, it all depends how they happen.   And to everyone who keeps saying he needs to get to 1,000 yard as a rookie because that's what elite rookie WRs do now, they keep just looking at things in a vacuum and not the full picture.  Usually the rookies who get to that mark are the only legitimate option in the passing attack for those teams. Anyone trying to point to guys like Nabers or BTJ last year are completely missing the point, T-Mac is not in remotely close to the same situation and is far more similar to MHJ and Odunze last year. The Giants 2nd and 3rd WRs last year were Wan'Dale Robinson and Slayton who had 699 and 573 yards, their 4th leading WR had a grand total of 62 yards in 16 games (their 3rd-7th leading rec yards were TE's and RBs). The Jags 2nd and 3rd WRs last year were Parker Washington and Kirk with 390 and 379 yards, while their 4th WR was Gabe Davis with 239 (while their 2nd leading rec yards was a TE with 411). The Cardinals had McBride with 111 catches for 1,146 yards The Bears had Moore with 98 for 966 and Allen with 70 for 744 Thielen, XL, Coker are absurdly better than the other WR options the Giants and Jags had last year, there is a real argument to make that our 4th best WR was better than those team's 2nd best.   That alone is a huge hurdle to T-Mac getting to the 1,000 yard mark as a rookie, no matter how ready he may or may not be.  MHJ was supposed to be the most pro-ready WR prospect in a LONG time and having McBride there was the main reason he finished with "only" 885 yards as a rookie.
    • They are going to throw everything and the kitchen sink at us, refs probably help them out as well. Can we steal it, I hope so. 
×
×
  • Create New...