nothing would be finer than jake in carolina....

[micnificent28]

locker that is....(or bradford)just going out on a limb here. but what would it cost us to make this happen. i m just curious what the board thinks would be the cost for us to jump this high and make it happen.

[rayzor]

jake bradford? never heard of him.

locker will go too early.

[2jakefansinva]

locker that is....(or bradford)just going out on a limb here. but what would it cost us to make this happen. i m just curious what the board thinks would be the cost for us to jump this high and make it happen.

No one knows what it would cost, not even the (so called) experts.

But if you just want an opinion..........WAY TOO MUCH!

[holderoftruth]

If he comes out.... he should be a top 10 pick.

Without a first rounder, it would cost at least Pep and the 2011 first rounder

[scpanther22]

The only guy that has a chance to slip is Sam bradford..but that depends on the other QBs that come out.

[Mekeritrig]

Jake Locker is anything but a sure thing. He is inaccurate and struggled against most of the decent defenses he played this season. All the first round hype surrounding the guy is a joke. He's a project who has the mechanics and arm strength to be an NFL QB, not an immediate starter.

[rayzor]

not wanting bradford.

[micnificent28]

Jake Locker is anything but a sure thing. He is inaccurate and struggled against most of the decent defenses he played this season. All the first round hype surrounding the guy is a joke. He's a project who has the mechanics and arm strength to be an NFL QB, not an immediate starter.

and who would u prefer...no qb is a sure thing and jake's been decent from the start this kids done more with less his whole career than all these other pretenders. if u gonna miss on a prospect i d rather miss on a kid with tons of upside than pike or colt.....

[Kurb]

Jake Locker is anything but a sure thing. He is inaccurate and struggled against most of the decent defenses he played this season. All the first round hype surrounding the guy is a joke. He's a project who has the mechanics and arm strength to be an NFL QB, not an immediate starter.

^this

[DirtyMagic97]

I have never understood the obsession with Jake Locker. He was bad as a first year starter. He was mediocre this year. Against good teams, he struggled. I'm not saying he can't play in the NFL, I just don't understand why everyone assumes he can.

[micnificent28]

I have never understood the obsession with Jake Locker. He was bad as a first year starter. He was mediocre this year. Against good teams, he struggled. I'm not saying he can't play in the NFL, I just don't understand why everyone assumes he can.

well i think its not that hes been stellar its that hes done more with less. this kid has beaten usc wit little to no help. i challenge u to name another offensive teammate of his. his situation is similar cutler at vand. hes done well with what he had which wasnt much. while is arm isnt in the same league as cutlers, he is a leader, has the "it" factor,and is bigger and stronger than most. the most important thing is he is a passer first with all the tools to be just as effective a runner as ur pat whites,jarret browns, and most running qbs.

[mmmbeans]

if bradford falls into the second half of the first round we seriously need to consider moving up to get him.

[DirtyMagic97]

well i think its not that hes been stellar its that hes done more with less. this kid has beaten usc wit little to no help. i challenge u to name another offensive teammate of his. his situation is similar cutler at vand. hes done well with what he had which wasnt much. while is arm isnt in the same league as cutlers, he is a leader, has the "it" factor,and is bigger and stronger than most. the most important thing is he is a passer first with all the tools to be just as effective a runner as ur pat whites,jarret browns, and most running qbs.

I agree he doesn't have much help, but Locker did not beat USC. The team did. In a normal year, 16 points against USC wouldn't keep you within 2 touchdowns of the Trojans. Watching him play, he doesn't show much in the way of physical tools that make him stand out. I will admit I only really watched him play twice this year, so maybe my opinion is unfounded. Like I said, I don't think he will definitely be a bad player, I just don't understand why he is getting so much hype already. That and I think he is going back for his senior year.

[micnificent28]

I agree he doesn't have much help, but Locker did not beat USC. The team did. In a normal year, 16 points against USC wouldn't keep you within 2 touchdowns of the Trojans. Watching him play, he doesn't show much in the way of physical tools that make him stand out. I will admit I only really watched him play twice this year, so maybe my opinion is unfounded. Like I said, I don't think he will definitely be a bad player, I just don't understand why he is getting so much hype already. That and I think he is going back for his senior year.

i ll agree with he the team beat usc,but u know the qb gets all the credit good or bad and he was the leader. i dont see a senario where he chooses to return to washington and lose. once again when "could" be the number one qb off the boards or even the number 2 which he would land him more cash this season than the rookie scale that ll be in place next season. whatever he desides to do or where he goes he ll be losing might as well lose with the rams or browns and get a big check than for free with washington.