Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Draft day 2010

Swarly

By Swarly,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Swarly Newbie

Swarly

Posted
Posted

Let's say that there isn't a legitimate QB to choose from when our pick roles around in round 2.. would you guys be opposed to maybe trading it for a 2011 1st rounder like 49ers did to us(and seahawks did to denver)? Chances are we'll be pretty high in round 2, so there will still be valuable players available to choose from.

Facing facts, there is very little if any chance of getting high enough in round 1 for one of the star QB's, and I am completely against trading Stewart or whoever else people are throwing around these days to get into round 1(like it's possible, RB's are a dime a dozen).

We won't be able to get a QB ready to start in round 2, and with Jake Locker entering in 2011, we'd have a legitimate chance of trading up to him with 2 first rounders. We could try to fill our needs through free agency by picking up Campbell(who is better than some of the later QB's that will be available in draft.) Worst comes to worst, we have 2 first rounders in 2011, and a chance to pick a real franchise QB for the future.

Just a little idea. I'm bored as poo lately with the semester ending, and nothing to do, so take it with a grain of salt =P

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Urrymonster Newbie

Urrymonster

Posted
Posted

Would not be opposed to it.

If we could somehow pick up an additional second rounder (vet clearout if a new FO comes in) I would be all for it. The more early firsts we can get hold of, the better chance we have of getting a genuine QB.

I still feel we need to draft someone in the second round though, otherwise we will be in trouble next season as well for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Swarly Newbie

Swarly

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Would not be opposed to it.

If we could somehow pick up an additional second rounder (vet clearout if a new FO comes in) I would be all for it. The more early firsts we can get hold of, the better chance we have of getting a genuine QB.

I still feel we need to draft someone in the second round though, otherwise we will be in trouble next season as well for sure.

Yeah, I'd hate to give up a 2nd round pick, but QB is the biggest need. If Golden Tate is available, I would LOVE to pick him, but he will probably go in round 1 :\

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest DrewBreesIsGod

Guest DrewBreesIsGod

Posted
Posted

Let's say that there isn't a legitimate QB to choose from when our pick roles around in round 2.. would you guys be opposed to maybe trading it for a 2011 1st rounder like 49ers did to us(and seahawks did to denver)? Chances are we'll be pretty high in round 2, so there will still be valuable players available to choose from.

Facing facts, there is very little if any chance of getting high enough in round 1 for one of the star QB's, and I am completely against trading Stewart or whoever else people are throwing around these days to get into round 1(like it's possible, RB's are a dime a dozen).

We won't be able to get a QB ready to start in round 2, and with Jake Locker entering in 2011, we'd have a legitimate chance of trading up to him with 2 first rounders. We could try to fill our needs through free agency by picking up Campbell(who is better than some of the later QB's that will be available in draft.) Worst comes to worst, we have 2 first rounders in 2011, and a chance to pick a real franchise QB for the future.

Just a little idea. I'm bored as poo lately with the semester ending, and nothing to do, so take it with a grain of salt =P

all I have to say to you is "I got my f ucking pitch back!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

only way that this happens is if hurney and fox aren't here. you don't pull stunts like that if your butt is on the hot seat.

i still don't like that idea because that means we don't have a pick until round 3 and there are still quite a few needs that must be met. it isn't just QB. we could be getting a DT/NT or WR....FS...SLB....no way to we pass up on opportunities to help out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Swarly Newbie

Swarly

Posted
  • Author
Posted

only way that this happens is if hurney and fox aren't here. you don't pull stunts like that if your butt is on the hot seat.

i still don't like that idea because that means we don't have a pick until round 3 and there are still quite a few needs that must be met. it isn't just QB. we could be getting a DT/NT or WR....FS...SLB....no way to we pass up on opportunities to help out there.

Yeah, I can see your point, but will we be able to get a DT/NT that will be as start-ready as Kemo/Tank Tyler? and Sherod Martin proved he can be a legit back up(maybe even starter) to Godfrey. WR/LB I DEFINITELY agree, we need to address that issue. Just throwing ideas out there.

best show in TV hands down...I'm Kenny f'ing Powers! The golden arm, Dr. Cock N' Balls....

definitely, can't freakin wait until the new season starts!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Swarly Newbie

Swarly

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Draft Golden Tate with the 2nd and let Moore have one year behind center before we draft a QB in 2011, unless Moore have really impressed

Golden Tate will not make it past 1st round, as much as I'd like to think otherwise, he just won't :[

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • UnluckyforSome
      NBC Sports 2026 NFL GM rankings

      By UnluckyforSome · Posted

      I think Canales goes before Young in that scenario.
    • tukafan21
      Joe Person: Panthers are NOT expected to extend Bryce Young before the 2026 season

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      But that's the point, if the locker room feels that way, then you're going to upset them by still keeping Bryce around and playing him over the Top 10 pick, as opposed to bringing in a vet to start until the rookie is ready. Again, it goes one of 3 ways... 1. Bryce plays well enough to earn an extension 2. Bryce still sucks and we draft his replacement who starts Week 1 with a new QB as his backup 3. Bryce still sucks, we draft his replacement in the 1st, but they start the season backing up a new vet QB who was brought in to be his mentor. With an OUTSIDE chance at a 4th option where Bryce plays well enough to convince the team to let him play out the 5th year option and then make a decision.  Which I can't see it happening, but there is still a non zero chance of that happening I guess. The only way we draft a QB next year and still have Bryce on the roster, is if we're taking someone in the middle rounds hoping to develop them as a long term backup to Bryce.
    • strato
      Brown on BY9 while talking to Chris Long

      By strato · Posted

      I hear you. But I am not absolving Legette just because he is from my neck of the woods or anything else.  Tge comment was more about the fans uneven application of blame.  I do agree that there is a noticeable disconnect between him and the QB and that he might do better with a more polished and capable delivery man.  Abd don’t feel that they used XL right, or at least how I expected it to look.  And that could be a function of a reticent WB that shies away from that style of attack. I mean it was either him or Canales that pretty much eliminated downfield from the playbook - even while we see guys running free at times. It Could work if they commit to it.  Whoever isn’t committing. 
×
×
  • Create New...