Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Deangelo Williams >>>> Adrian Peterson


Gscottnc5

Recommended Posts

the flaw with this comparison...and there always seems to be one when comparing deangelo williams to anyone (at least on the huddle) is you're comparing 4 years of stats for williams to 3 years for peterson.

the most logical thing to do is to compare peterson's 3 seasons to williams's first 3 seasons.

...btw, a couple of your stats for peterson are a wee bit off.

peterson (39 games started)

atempts - 915

rushing yards - 4401

ypc - 4.9

tds- 40

fumbles - 20

fumbles lost - 13

williams (18 games started)

attempts - 638

rushing yards - 2733

ypc - 4.2

tds - 23

fumbles - 2

fumbles - 1

i'm sure that someone will come along with with "but, but, but, williams blah blah blah"...the fact of the matter is, williams hasn't had to deal with even half the weight that peterson has in any of his 4 seasons in the league.

"...but williams doesn't fumble as much as peterson!"

who does?

and since no one else in the league does, why is that so significant when comparing just these 2?

No, the more applicable comparison is to compare Peterson's three seasons to DWills LAST 3 seasons...not his first 3 seasons. He was not the starter his rookie year.

In the past 3 seasons, DWill has outperformed Peterson is just about every category.

Who is best? don't know....but I would take DWill if I were putting together a team.

Peterson has put up his stats behind a stud OLine. DWill has put up his behind a revolving door of a line. We have had sig injuries on the Oline the past 3 seasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the flaw with this comparison...and there always seems to be one when comparing deangelo williams to anyone (at least on the huddle) is you're comparing 4 years of stats for williams to 3 years for peterson.

the most logical thing to do is to compare peterson's 3 seasons to williams's first 3 seasons.

...btw, a couple of your stats for peterson are a wee bit off.

peterson (39 games started)

atempts - 915

rushing yards - 4401

ypc - 4.9

tds- 40

fumbles - 20

fumbles lost - 13

williams (18 games started)

attempts - 638

rushing yards - 2733

ypc - 4.2

tds - 23

fumbles - 2

fumbles - 1

i'm sure that someone will come along with with "but, but, but, williams blah blah blah"...the fact of the matter is, williams hasn't had to deal with even half the weight that peterson has in any of his 4 seasons in the league.

"...but williams doesn't fumble as much as peterson!"

who does?

and since no one else in the league does, why is that so significant when comparing just these 2?

For one, you can't show a good comparison with using the first 3 years of each of their careers. It's not apples to apples. He didn't start. We are looking at STARTED GAMES. That is the only fair assessment.

So my original comparison is the most accurate way to evaluate each player.

Your way is completely WRONG

http://www.nfl.com/players/deangelowilliams/profile?id=WIL221323

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For one, you can't show a good comparison with using the first 3 years of each of their careers. It's not apples to apples. He didn't start. We are looking at STARTED GAMES. That is the only fair assessment.

So my original comparison is the most accurate way to evaluate each player.

Your way is completely WRONG

http://www.nfl.com/players/deangelowilliams/profile?id=WIL221323

my way is wrong?

fine.

your stats and your link all provide career totals, not just starting stats. if you want to look at just games started...

peterson (39 games started)

812 attempts

4018 yards

4.9 ypc

37 TDs

19 fumbles

12 fumbles lost

williams (31 games started)

523 attempts

2759 yards

5.0 ypc

25 TDs

3 fumbles

3 fumbles lost

and before anyone spouts off about the 8 game difference between the 2...take a good look at the stats.

that's a difference of..

289 attempts

1259 yards

12 TDs

that's a season's total for a good running back crammed into a difference of just 8 games.

who wants to give williams enough of a workload to catch up to peterson and do a real comparison?

again, williams is a good back...but it's long past time for people to stop these comparisons to try and make williams look like the superman they want him to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • His points are valid.  However, it seems a bit based on past performance and fails to take into consideration trends and conditions that might suggest growth in 2025.   For one, he breaks the team down by position and ranks them separately.  I guess that is a fair way to do it, but they are dependent upon each other. Last year, our DL sucked.  That impacts the rest of the defense.  With no internal pressure, the QBs simply step up to avoid the Edge rush.  I would have suggested that the internal DL is now featuring pass rushers and large people who can collapse the pocket.  Secondly, the LBs were not protected very well in 2024.  It is hard to see the holes and step up when a guard is in your earhole a second after the snap.  Finally, the defensive backs will be forced to make fewer tackles and they will be better in pass protection with a new and improved DL.    Canales made an interesting comment the other day, and I (from the outside looking in) feel the same way:  (paraphrasing) "I have never seen a better group of rookies."   I think the biggest concern is the learning curve.  How long before these rookies are ready?   I am bullish on this team.  I think they win 3 of their first 4 and get confident.  The get the fans behind them.  From there, they win 6 of the remaining 13.  If they stay injury free, they have an outside shot at the NFC south.     
    • Biiiiiig eyeroll on this.  First, Look at historical stats of the most recent historical great DBs.  I plucked 3, Revis, Sherman, and Norman (cuzz he was our guy).  Combined post age 30, there are TWO pro bowls between those 3 and wanna get this...ZERO seasons with 16 games started.  ALL missed time.  It is RARE that Corners survive that long in the NFL and its about time we started recognizing this fact.  Jaycee is a good bet because it hasnt been anything seriously devastating injury wise, and with his sample size he could and should be an incredible piece for the panthers through age 30. Jaire kinda flops on the other side, hes 28...so hes under 30, but he wants his payday before it comes up, hes also been injury prone lately.  Bulk of the contract will be on opposite side of 30.  Will both of these guys help us be better in 2026?  SURE!  No doubt, but the question is, will these guys help us past 2026...not sure. The investment isnt worth the risk, nor would the ROI be anywhere close to worth it.  Neither guy is moving us from a 6-8 win team to a 8-10 team, period. My point is we're in this state a 6-8 win team IMO and he projects us as  a 4-6 win team.  EVEN if we think Jaire or Ramsey will make us a 6-8 win team, it in NO WAY is worth the money or capital to move that much just to suck kinda less.  
    • I assumed he was retiring but apparently he plans on playing multiple more seasons.  Florida is gonna have trouble holding onto everyone.  Happens to all teams that have that much success.
×
×
  • Create New...