Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Playbook intelligent discussion

top dawg

By top dawg,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

ncfan Grand Master

ncfan

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Leeroy Jenkins Ph.D. said:

Colts fans were saying his, "Run, Run, Pass, Punt" play calling philosophy was losing them games as it was painfully predictable even with their O-Line and RB.  I hate to say it but they were right. 

I could not count the number of drives that were Run, Run/Run-Screen, Pass/Run-Screen, Punt.  

Funny you same ruined that.

this was dropped to me this afternoon from someone who used to cover the Colts a little.

IMG_6684.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted (edited)

Comparing the two pass charts, one would think the two were in totally different offenses.  Why is Andy's pas chart so much fuller?  Why is Bryce's so condensed?  Did someone kidnap Frank in Seattle and put in a body double?  Why did Andy have success in one of the toughest NFL stadiums in the entire League?  Had the OL not laid an egg and the defense held up better, that would have been a win.  Pre-snap penalties and the inability to stop Seattle's offense was the issue.

Edited by 45catfan
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SetfreexX Mentor

SetfreexX

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, 45catfan said:

Are you seriously suggesting we run the read option with Bryce?  You did see the fumble yesterday with the arm tap, correct?   When he scrambles on a protection breakdown, he doesn't look half bad, but to suggest he should run right into the teeth of the defense is mind blowing.

I agree, there could be some pre-snap motion.  It's not been absent, but nearly so.

1-3 in the redzone, short yardage, yes, the fumbles have been hits he did not see coming. 

No one is suggesting it be a staple, that simply wouldn't work, HOWEVER when EDGE defenders are COMPLETELY disregarding him and it's room to run for days it would make sense. 

Go back and watch the tape it's there, just the thought of him keeping on tape as DC's review film at least takes a defender out of the run as they at least have to pay attention to Bryce. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
  • Author
Posted
6 hours ago, Rags said:

Motion thing really stands out to me and has had me fuming. Our guys aren't suddenly gonna start getting more separation, the fact we don't use it or uptempo more so teams can't dictate matchups is. Very upsetting. 

The biggest takeaway for me was that Reich doesn't really trust Bryce. I thought about it, and it really makes sense. For me, it's unforgivable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • Dave Gettleman's Shorts
      TIME TO SPECULATE

      By Dave Gettleman's Shorts · Posted

      adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...