Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rookie QB conundrum: Mental game/Safe Pick vs Physical talent High Risk/High Reward.


Eazy-E
 Share

Recommended Posts

You almost always hear the debate that rookie QBs should sit and learn the NFL game because it is incredibly hard to succeed on physical talent alone. Bryce Young was highly touted because of his mental acumen while a guy like Anthony Richardson skyrocketed up draft boards due to his insane physical traits for a QB.
 

We were all told and sold on the idea that Bryce was leaps and bounds ahead of most rookie QBs in the mental side of the game and one of the smartest QBs to ever come out in the draft. It’s the reason we were told we traded up for him because he would be a plug and play starter who would only get better the more he plays. Unfortunately his physical talent has not translated well to the NFL. It’s all fine and dandy if you can process multiple scenarios and outcomes in your head in seconds but what good does that do you if you can’t physically execute half of it.

It’s the reason NFL teams will usually take huge risks on insanely physical freaks and usually not on physically limited, highly intelligent players. You can teach a player the game but you can’t teach size, speed, and strength.

Cam Newton was a physical freak who also dominated college football and was still not a unanimous number one overall pick because people were worried he would not be able to process and learn an NFL offense. That’s why a guy like Blaine Gabbert was in the conversation to go number one overall. That’s all ancient history at this point and we all saw how that turned out.

Rarely do you have a prospect like an Andrew Luck or Trevor Lawrence that has the combination of both mental and physical talent that most agree are can’t miss, once in a generation type players.

Is the NFL shifting to physical talent being more important than the mental side of things, especially for QBs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Newtcase said:

The NFL is some grown ass men, many of them fierce and fighting through tons of adversity to get their opportunity.  Physical attributes will never be a bad thing, lack of them almost always is. 

I noticed RAS score being mentioned a bunch this past draft and it seems like Fitt and co referenced it when talking about a couple of our own draft picks. It’s not a new scoring system but I don’t think I had ever even heard of it 5+ years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There aren't any steadfast rules. Ultimately, you need a combination of physical talent and mental acuity and mental toughness. Every player is his own unique evaluation and that's why it's so tough. It'll always be more art than science no matter how many measurables they come up with for the evaluation process. Busts and steals are just the way it goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Given that the immediate impact we need at edge. We almost certainly address that in Free agency, not in the draft. Same with Linebacker, unless Styles or Allen is still there at 19. I think the same for OT.  What is the position that we could draft in the 1st round and get immediate help in the first is how im approaching their decision-making  I know ill get dragged for this, but im thinking they go DT in the first. A guy that can play right away and be a complement to D.Brown to wreak havoc at the LOS.   So unless a top tier LB is there, I think DT will be the move. 
    • I think people forget that by his last season Steve Smith had the ass and he played like it - and for no really good reason other than that other stars were emerging on the team and he didn't want to share the spot light.  He was more of a locker room distraction than he was worth. He went on to have great performances with the Ravens' but G-man made the right move allowing him to move on from here.  I personally think it was addition by subtraction and we don't have a super bowl run with Smith on the roster. Steve Smith remains a narcissist who I've never seen internalize his own culpability when it comes to his relationships with others - it's always somebody else's fault as to why he was forced to act like an asshole. This video is a product ad.  I'm cringed that either of these two Panther greats are party to it.
    • I think the ‘issue’ here is that we had two guys that clashed for several reasons. In some ways they were different, but in other ways they had a lot in common, and sadly they couldn’t see the forest for the trees. Sometimes when you have two people like that together they are either going to love or hate each other, and if it’s the latter, you need someone to mediate and hope the two individuals are capable of putting their differences aside for the common good. In this instance, they couldn’t find a way to move forwards together because I don’t think either guy wanted to play second fiddle to the other. This video basically said neither guy had the tools to bridge that gap and mend that fence, and perhaps also were unwilling to give an inch at that stage in their lives and careers. So a divorce, while unfortunate, was always likely. Do we win the Super Bowl with Smitty and Cam? Well, it’s one of life’s big what ifs for us Panthers fans.
×
×
  • Create New...