Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BoA: Do they allow DSLRs in the stadium?


TheSaint

Recommended Posts

yes.

I've seen white lenses in the stands, but I've heard it depends on what you get at the gate. My suggestion would be to have a long lens that's not conspicuous, if you have it. No real reason to take a shorter lens in.

eh, ive got a 70-200L, but wasnt wanting to take/deal with that. Im not interested in game shots. Ive got a pregame field pass and was hoping i could get by with a 50mm. Its really not a big deal and may just take a P&S

thanks though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

eh, ive got a 70-200L, but wasnt wanting to take/deal with that. Im not interested in game shots. Ive got a pregame field pass and was hoping i could get by with a 50mm. Its really not a big deal and may just take a P&S

thanks though

for pregame? Sure, you could suffice with a 50. But, you could easily fit a 50 in your pocket and mount something else to the camera and switch on the fly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

for pregame? Sure, you could suffice with a 50. But, you could easily fit a 50 in your pocket and mount something else to the camera and switch on the fly.

true...id just hate for them to say it wasnt allowed. then have to figure out what to do with it....but Im thinking more about it. Im sitting 7th row in corner endzone. Might be some decent shots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why is that? Stand out too much?

Dude-- take it-- you will be happy--

I took my 55 & 300- got them both in.. I EVEN carried the bag.. You can carry a bag in, the lady didnt even bother me...

If I was you though, I would wear your Saints Jersey under your shirt and have a panther bennie on...

\

I know if i was working the door I would be a dick and make you carry it back to your car :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...