Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chad Ochocinco will replace Wes Welker in the Pro Bowl


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

from ProFootballTalk.com:

Although the Bengals didn't have a single Pro Bowler when the rosters were first announced (making them the first division winner since the 1970 AFL-NFL merger not to have anyone make the Pro Bowl), Ochocinco will be going as an injury replacement. Patriots wide receiver Wes Welker will not play because of the knee injury he suffered in the regular-season finale, and first alternate Randy Moss also won't play because of an injury. Ochocinco is next on the list...This is Ochocinco's sixth Pro Bowl selection.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/01/15/ochocinco-going-to-the-pro-bowl/

Vincent Jackson's numbers, while similar to Ocho, were a little better. but I think hes a better receiver in general.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's just two numbers listed. No big deal; don't know why people think it's "so cool" to point out that it isn't technically 85.

My money says the dumbass had no idea until someone told him; don't know why his fans get so so upset when it's pointed out.

Well look at you, all researchin' and poo and using that there Bold Feature. Gold star! To the head of the class you go!

gracias... :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ok fair to judge only his starts.  But you do acknowledge that going from "he's waaaay above league average in a number of categories" to "here's a single stat where he's above league average (not "waaaay") and another where he is exactly at the league average" is a pretty significant backpedal, no?  I'm guessing he's probably in the ~10th range for completion percentage too if we're only looking at starts (I'm too lazy to isolate his starts and do the calculations), so I'll grant you that one too.  But I don't think completion percentage is all that meaningful as a standalone stat if it isn't bolstered by good TD%, Y/A, etc. On that note, for how much people like posting Passing Charts in here (*cough* CRA) - if you peep Shough's passing charts, he hasn't completed a single 20+ yard pass in the past 3 games combined.  His last one was in Week 13 against the Dolphins, which was a single pass of 24 yards.  I just want to be consistent in how we apply our standards - I think it's always been warranted to criticize Bryce for it (even dating back to his rookie season), but do we suddenly not care about that with Shough? And yeah I did acknowledge that Saints' fans have reason to be excited about him and complimented his poise, which is giving my props.  Still not sure I agree that he looks better than a "ton" of QBs nor do I think you or anyone have really demonstrated that.  I think you are generally one of the more reasonable level-headed posters which is why I'm confused at what I consider to be rather hyperbolic language about Shough.
    • I don't disagree with you, but want to point out that Tremble's strong suit has always been blocking. Case and point: on Horn's 25 yard run, he lays down not 1 but 2 nice blocks...and is looking for #3! https://www.panthers.com/video/jimmy-horn-jr-s-25-yard-run-gives-panthers-red-zone-access-on-first-drive
    • It is a popularity contest.  The selection does have meaning though. It is also 1 of the criteria that is considered for the HOF. The game does not have any significance. The team hasn't been to the playoffs in nearly a decade. That's why they don't get primetime national coverage. To the victors go the spoils.
×
×
  • Create New...