Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We need a goalie.


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, BY9Franchise said:

Honestly I'd go for it.... contrary to the casuals on x and Facebook the canes d played pretty well....

 

I think we could get at least .900 out of Cambell he would be facing half the shots he did in Edmonton 

That wasn’t on the D. Holy poo. Ya the first PP goal was on them for leaving Stamkos alone in the spot everyone scores on us. But TT fell down and then picked up the wrong guy. That’s not on the defensemen. Most of the other goals were just bad goalie. He didn’t even move to a majority of the shots. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also fug it. Maybe just bring up Perets. I’m done with Raanta until he’s healthy again. 
 

The point is we have to try something because I feel like if we don’t we are going to end up middle of the pack on the outside this year. So even if we do try it’s not like we are losing anything. 

Edited by Harbingers
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Harbingers said:

That wasn’t on the D. Holy poo. Ya the first PP goal was on them for leaving Stamkos alone in the spot everyone scores on us. But TT fell down and then picked up the wrong guy. That’s not on the defensemen. Most of the other goals were just bad goalie. He didn’t even move to a majority of the shots. 

Exactly.... he let in 6 goals over expected.... 8 goals on 14 shots I doubt we could have done worst playing with six skaters (they would have played cleaner knowing there was no goalie)  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BY9Franchise said:

Might not even want him then rod leaving him in probably has his head screwed up.

Edited this above.

 

“The point is we have to try something because I feel like if we don’t we are going to end up middle of the pack on the outside this year. So even if we do try it’s not like we are losing anything.”

I want Campbell or Perets. There is no way Nashville or Philly are giving up their 1A goalies, especially with the fact Saros is basically the face of Nashville and both teams are doing good so far. It’s idiotic to even think that. Maybe there’s a west coast goalie we could snipe that I haven’t thought about. But I think Campbell is the safest bet. I’d rather we just bring up Perets and start Pytor for a stretch to see if he can get a rhythm. 
 

Im done with Raanta though. That performance last night clearly indicates he’s got some serious injury. 

Edited by Harbingers
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Edited this above.

 

“The point is we have to try something because I feel like if we don’t we are going to end up middle of the pack on the outside this year. So even if we do try it’s not like we are losing anything.”

I want Campbell or Perets. There is no way Nashville or Philly are giving up their 1A goalies, especially with the fact Saros is basically the face of Nashville and both teams are doing good so far. It’s idiotic to even think that. Maybe there’s a west coast goalie we could snipe that I haven’t thought about. But I think Campbell is the safest bet. I’d rather we just bring up Perets and start Pytor for a stretch to see if he can get a rhythm. 

I agree we don't need an "elite" guy by any means... because our defense has played solid.... allowing a mere 14 shots is amazing defense and 6 of those goals were soft....

I think Campbell could do very well here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pyotr has definitely showed signs of improvement over last seasons drop off too. I think Pyotr is the type of guy that we need to say it’s your net to lose, not your net to gain. Ya he dropped some goals to Edmonton who was desperately trying to show they aren’t an outsider, but in the 3rd when it came to it he played lights out. 

Edited by Harbingers
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Panthers Fan 69 said:

And yeah maybe saros is out but wasn’t the Jets big name goalie on the trade block for the off-season?  Not sold on Campbell but his floor is better than anything we have with our defense.  

We don’t have the cap space to take his contract. Plus the jets are good so why let him go? He’s at what 6.75M? Nah. 
 

I’d say bring Perets up LTIR Raanta and make Pyotr #1 at least until Christmas. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

I’m also in favor a FINALLY reuniting the SAT line.  Put Jarvis with bunting and necas with Drury and Neosen. Tell me that doesn’t sound like a winner?

SAT line needs to be a thing even though Tripp has been pushing the Svech-Aho non-chemistry narrative. I call BS. I don’t see us retaining Necas in the offseason. Let him go spend time on 4.

Also put Svech back on the PK. I think he’s losing interest. We need to engage him. 

Edited by Harbingers
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I gave you a full breakdown and examples from last year as to why I think it's unfair to expect 1k from T-Mac this year if everyone stays healthy. But the TLDR version is we will have 4 legitimately good WRs next year, most rookies who get to 1,000 yards don't have any others on the team with them let alone 3 others, it will be hard for him to put up 1k with out the others being injured or falling short of expectations themselves, but in 2026 without Thielen it's different.
    • Ulcerative Colitis is not CTE. 
    • Last year Thielen had 615 yards in 10 games (had more ypg than his 1k season in 23).  XL had 497 in 16 games with tons of drops and Coker had 478 in 11. They also only had only 192 of our 518 targets to get those numbers. So if Thielen has 1,000 yards again, XL and Coker each improve to say 600 yards each, and T-Mac comes in at 800 yards, you're going to say that's not good enough?  Especially if he ends up with close to, if not getting to, double digit TD's like I think he will, as he's going to be a red zone monster for Bryce? Because if that's the breakdown of just the Top 4 and Bryce plays all 17 games, he's going to be pushing a 4,000 yard season as the TEs, RBs, and other WRs will probably add up to 750-1k yards as well, and I think that would be far more than anyone here could be expecting of him this season. Last year the Giants only had 2 players with more than 331 yards besides Nabers and they were 699 and 573 while Nabers "only" had 1,200 yards (granted in 15 games).  While the Jags second leading receiving was a TE with 411 yards and BTJ also "only" had 1,282 but in all 17 games. Odunze couldn't get there (734 in 17 games) with Moore and Allen there, just as McConkey was able to get there because his competition for targets was Quentin Johnson (711 yards), Josh Palmer (584), and Will Dissly (481) who I think Thielen, XL, and Coker are all better than any of them. If everyone stays healthy and XL/Coker have improved, I think Bryce is going to spread the ball around rather than focus on T-Mac in a way that most of the 1k rookies have been able to get. Again I point to MHJ and the Cardinals last year. They had 3,859 yards receiving.   McBride had 1,146, MHJ had 885, then their 3rd and 4th in rec yards were 548 and 414. Take the 146 and 85 that McBride/MHJ had over my example for our guys and give them to the other two and they get to 7 yards shy of the 600 I'm using for XL/Coker, while the rest of the team added up to 866 yards. So, if you expect T-Mac to get to 1k, where are you taking those yards from? if anything, XL and Coker each getting 600 yards seems like a low projection, so they wouldn't come from there. Maybe they come from Thielen now that we have T-Mac as the true #1.  But I think if anything, having T-Mac draw attention will just make it easier for Thielen to get open and him and Bryce have great chemistry already, he's not going to stop throwing his way if he can pick up easy chunks of yards there. So maybe they come from the RBs, TEs, other WRs, but it's I think a very fair example to show why expecting 1,000 yards if everyone stays healthy isn't necessarily fair to him. It's also why I said I'd then expect at least 1,200 yards in 2026, as once Thielen leave and all 3 of T-Mac/XL/Coker get better, they absorb that 1,000 yards Thielen leaves behind with T-Mac probably taking close to half of it and the other two splitting up the other half.
×
×
  • Create New...