Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bring it on. YOU are the coach~


Cat Fanboy

Recommended Posts

OK, so tell me how you game plan 1/10.

VS Cardinals:

Stomped em like an ant first time. You know they will gameplan on putting 8 in the box and 'watching' Smitty. More protection for Warner to burn us. What would you do as 'Fox' ?

Homerboy: ground and pound. They cant stop us no matter what. Put 8 in the box? No big deal - one tackle away from a TD.

Quick outs to Smitty.

Play actions, screens, REVERSES to Smitty FTW.

VS Falcons

I seriously doubt the Falcons can beat Warner. If they do, it's fine - we will stomp the birds too.

The Falcons will be trying to put pressure on Jake to stop the deep fade to Smith.

Homerboy: Stop Turner. 8 in the box and make Ryan beat us. Mix up blitz packages and get to him.

et tu?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vs. Cardinals:

On defense, I'd start with several delayed blitzes, with Davis coming around from the blind side and Peppers pushing from the other. Play Lucas press on Boldin, Gamble off of Fitzgerald, and Godfrey cheating Boldin's routes. The hope is that 1.) Warner sees the pressure and fires early to Boldin, which results in a Godfrey INT, or 2.) Davis hits him from the backside and either sacks him or causes a fumble. On another 20% of the defensive plays I'd rush Peppers then have Brayton fall back into coverage over the RB. With some luck, any attempt at a dump off would end in either a short gain or an INT.

On offense, I would continue run the "Heavy" formation on runs. Their line is simply not big enough to hold against that: we will almost always end up in the secondary. On passing situations I'd do whatever I could to get a safety cheating to either side, then run a fade to either Muhammed or Smith as the case may be. Their corners simply cannot play one on one with either of them.

Vs. Falcons:

On defense, we should pull a page from our games against Vick, and have Davis "spy" their RBs. Gamble can shadow White, though he may get burned a bit, Godfrey can provide safety help. Peppers will have to take a few plays in coverage as well, rather than rushing the passer. Quite simply, Atlanta's ground game is designed almost totally on getting the RBs past the initial rush of linesmen, either through cutbacks or guard pulls. The entire running games depends on our blitzers running around the pocket and not containing the line of scrimmage. Therefore, coverage and gap control will be more important than brute force; we won't out-physical them, because they're not playing that style. They depend on misdirection.

On offense, we can continue to have success with the run, but will have to play a little more finesse than we're used to. They have the type of lineman that can hold up the middle quite well, but have problems getting outside. As much as possible, we should have Muhammed in motion to the running side of the play, with the tight end pulling out as well. In most cases, if the play gets blown up in the direction we intended to go, DeAngelo can cut it back and make them pay for committing to one side. They can not run sideline to sideline. Smith will probably be shadowed for much of the game, but on play action passes he should be able to turn on the afterburners for a sprint to the endzone on at least a few plays. Their corners cheat towards the line of scrimmage at times: take advantage of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neither have good run defenses or top flight QBs so realistically speaking we should be able to win against either opponent with a semi-decent offensive plan.

I've seen too much of both QBs to think that either of them could not beat us if we do not respect their skills. Warner may be 37 but he has one of the fastest releases in football, and when he makes good decisions, they are really frickin' good.

Ryan may be a rookie, but he refuses to doubt himself or his abilities. Therefore, he's already mentally ahead of a lot of veteran QBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't believe how many of you guys do not think the Falcons capable of beating the Cards. In case you haven't checked, the Cardinals looked less than impressive in their last few games and finished 9-7 in one of this year's worst divisions.

The Falcons, on the other hand, finished only one game behind of us in one of the league's best divisions this year. And they are only getting better. They have a great running back going up against a 22nd ranked rush defense in Arizona, as well as a very good receiver in Roddie White.

I'm not saying they will win, but I'm just surprised at how many people are quick to count out a team that beat us 45-28.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't believe how many of you guys do not think the Falcons capable of beating the Cards. In case you haven't checked, the Cardinals looked less than impressive in their last few games and finished 9-7 in one of this year's worst divisions.

The Falcons, on the other hand, finished only one game behind of us in one of the league's best divisions this year. And they are only getting better. They have a great running back going up against a 22nd ranked rush defense in Arizona, as well as a very good receiver in Roddie White.

I'm not saying they will win, but I'm just surprised at how many people are quick to count out a team that beat us 45-28.

We also beat them 24-9. And in truth the Falcons haven't looked like world beaters recently. In their last 6 games, they lost to Denver at home, gave up 400 yards passing to Drew Brees, and struggled against both the Vikes and the Rams.

But certainly the Falcons are capable of beating the Cardinals. In fact, I think they will. But I think to many in the media are overlooking the Cardinals because of how they have played recently. The Cards have one of the best passing attacks in the game, and the Falcons have one of the worst pass defenses in the game. And the falcons have struggled when they played strong passing attacks. Their last two losses are to teams that pass the ball well (Denver and New Orleans).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We also beat them 24-9. And in truth the Falcons haven't looked like world beaters recently.

But I think to many in the media are overlooking the Cardinals because of how they have played recently.

;)

Certainly neither team has looked their best recently. I just think Atlanta is a much more balanced team, and I think they'll come up with an adequate game plan against Arizona. They won't stop Warner, to be sure, but probably emulate our "bend-but-don't-break" philosophy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im banking on the Vikings winning, so I don't think we have to worry about either of those teams. I don't know who I would rather play though, Falcons or Cardinals, if the Eagles steal one in Minnesota, that is. On one hand you have Atlanta who beat us senseless last time so I can't really see them doing that again. On the other hand you have Arizona who we squeaked past a win but they would have to travel all the way to the east coast after playing a tough one against the Falcons and it will be extremely cold, screwing their pass attack over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...