Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Call of Duty: World at War


Freeze

Recommended Posts

Decent game, in desperate need of a patch though.

-Terrible spawn system

-Lots of glitches to get under maps

-Weapons not well balanced

Nazi Zombies is addicting and awesome, though.

The bad spawns won't change. It is like that on Xbox360 too and the last CoD was like that also (4).

Glitches are in all games, takes a short time before they all figure it out, usually things don't get patched.

And the early weapons do suck (if it's the same as 360). I'm level 36 and I really only like the SMG's, the rest are trash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The bad spawns won't change. It is like that on Xbox360 too and the last CoD was like that also (4).

Glitches are in all games, takes a short time before they all figure it out, usually things don't get patched.

And the early weapons do suck (if it's the same as 360). I'm level 36 and I really only like the SMG's, the rest are trash.

4 wasn't as bad as 5 when it comes to spawns, I've never been killed from spawn 5-6 times in a row in TDM.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 wasn't as bad as 5 when it comes to spawns, I've never been killed from spawn 5-6 times in a row in TDM.

No, not as bad, however I played online PC games in the 90's that had better spawn points than these "NextGen" consoles do. It's something these guys always overlook it seems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Really? You don't see why a team can't draft a QB in the 1st round while then starting their former #1 overall pick over them while on the last year of their deal? It puts the team in a TERRIBLE place no matter how the season goes.  If Bryce sucks, you have to answer questions as to why he was still on the team to begin with, let alone starting over the rookie.  If he's good, then you run into the situation the Vikings were in last offseason with sticking with the rookie contract or the the guy who just performed instead of said young QB. It's one thing when teams keep a vet around as a bridge QB, it's something entirely different when that QB is still only in their mid 20's and was taken #1 overall by that team.   That just doesn't happen and not sure it ever has in NFL history before.
    • What is the alternative? - BY, will not play for less then his perceived contract (just like Cam Newton did). So you pay him top of market as befitting a 1st round, Heisman winning, playing birthing QB would get. Or you cut him. - Then we are forced to either sign a stop gap QB / previously failed QB and try to fix him or you spend a 1st round pick and draft a guy, basically resetting the team.  The reality is that we all want a top 5 QB. The problem is there are only 5 of those guys in the world and drafting, even #1 overall doesn't guarantee that.  The other problem is the NFL market. Young QB get paid. Even an average, young QB gets top of market deals. I know a lot of people here think we could sign him to an 'average QB contract' but thats not reality. Didnt happen with Cam wont happen with BY.  So we could let this season flush out and he is again a middling QB. But then we cut and restart or accept it is what it is (including compensation) and build a team around what we have.  My money is on the latter. 
×
×
  • Create New...