Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

THREE WORDS: Defensive Playoff Philosophy should be...


HGG

Recommended Posts

..."CLOSE THE DEAL."

1. Quit getting burned on 3rd and 8 (or long).

2. If a ball hits you in the hands on First or Second Down, then INTERCEPT IT, instead of bobbling it before it finally hits the ground, only for you to then get burned on 3rd and 6 as the team marches down the field for a score (see multiple times during the Giants game). If you intercept a ball that's thrown right to you, THAT'S A DEFENSIVE STOP, jocks. You can then get off the field. You don't have to spot the offense THREE DOWNS each time, you know? :mad2:

"CLOSE THE DEAL."

Stop keeping it open. You don't stop them on 3rd and long, like you don't. You don't intercept most balls that are thrown directly to you, like you didn't most of the second half of the season, you keep giving the other offense chances to score, which they have been doing.

CLOSE THE DEAL!

Do that, and this team won't lose, because the offense is putting up enough points, even though they need to stop giving up when they have a cushion.

INCREASE THE CUSHION, should be their mindset, even if it's just by a field goal. Their goal should be to score something every time, not merely just to try and waste time, which hasn't been working (trying to make sure that you score would guarantee more time being wasted, duh).

Defense...CLOSE THE DEAL.

Offense...INCREASE THE CUSHION.

That is all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Panthers have done really well on 1st and 2nd down. If they can just put the clamps on 3rd down, this team will be very scary in the playoffs. Imagine if all those 3rd and longs are not converted .... that puts the ball in our offense's hand and there's no telling how many points they'll score.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ahhhh yes.

As all great football minds know, games are typically decided by force of will.

Works for Belichick.

If you think you are better than the other guy, that's what you try to do. You force your will on them.

That's how DeAngelo Williams is playing these days, like he refuses to be denied. Previous seasons, as soon as he was touched from behind, he'd just slide down to the ground. Not any more.

He's forcing his will.

If the Defense had the same mindset, they might not keep getting burned on 3rd and 5 or more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh. OK.

And to think that all this time all the film study, planning and practice could have been replaced by a passionate reading of "The Little Engine That Could."

Oh. OK

A desire, and will to win is not required to win in any sport, and can be replaced with simple preparation.

You were a pine rider growing up weren't you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...