Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

On Defense, the Offense is key in 2010


Recommended Posts

No matter what side of the fence you are on one thing is undeniable; the defensive line is very young, inexperienced and in many way less talented. They won't have vetern like Peppers, Kemo, Brayton and Lewis backing them up much less starting infront of them. But the players on left on the defensive line or the players that have left won't be as big of a factor as the offense will be in determining the level of play the defense as a whole can strive to in 2010.

Ron Meeks brings a style of Tampa/Cover 2 that really is different in many ways than what other teams run. Meeks' defenses have been known to produce at the highest level when they are able to "pin their ears back" (I actually hate that term but oh well) and play more freely and with the ability to take more risks. And this style of play usually comes from the offense being able to score often and score a lot.

Many of the younger players being asked to step up on defense are an ideal fit for this type of defense. With all of that youthful poteniel, players like Brown and Irvin will be given more freedom to just go after the QB, something that seems to be very natural and talented at doing.

The biggest concern will be the offense giving that type of production that will allow the defense to play in this manner. When the defense fears that any and every miscue could be the one play that leads to a lose, the younger players will play tight and start over-thinking. But if the defense has the confidence that no matter what happens on defense, the offense can turn around and march down the field then these younger players will be able to play more lose and let their natural abilities take over; resulting in better play and more turnovers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The cover 2 only works when there is pressure up front. Meek's system depends on it. Much of our success at the end of 2009 was due to the defense creating turnovers and limiting the other team's offense so Moore wasn't pressured to do more than he was capable of. Tampa Bay comes to mind. I wonder what will happen when the offense is under pressure to score and essentially win a shoot-out. Even the best offense in 2008 (the Saints) only finished 8-8 without a stout defense. And as promising as Moore is, he still isn't Drew Brees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The cover 2 only works when there is pressure up front. Meek's system depends on it. Much of our success at the end of 2009 was due to the defense creating turnovers and limiting the other team's offense so Moore wasn't pressured to do more than he was capable of. Tampa Bay comes to mind. I wonder what will happen when the offense is under pressure to score and essentially win a shoot-out. Even the best offense in 2008 (the Saints) only finished 8-8 without a stout defense. And as promising as Moore is, he still isn't Drew Brees.

Exactly, and the time that Meeks pressure from the front 4 is at its best is when the offense is able to allow them to be more aggressive. The 2nd half of the Vikings game and the Giants game last year come to mind of how the defense was able to generate more pressure as the offense was able to march down the field and score points. Even the Arizona game with Jake starting had that same feel to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do Panthers need to trade for Peyton ?

Moore will do fine in his starting roll.

The defense played better last season when Moore started B/C they had a chance to rest .

Jake was not running the 3 and out offense

I see the D -Line being better this season

Last season Peppers played ever now and then

D/T's were a revolving door due to injuries

Brayton was the only solid player all season

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No. Physical tools alone aren't enough. There are plenty of examples of draft busts to support that. Aost all of them had the physical tools and that wasn't enough. But Bryce is a perfect example of the opposite. Absolutely elite intangibles aren't enough either. If you simply don't have the physical abilities all the football intelligence and work ethic in the world won't be enough to overcome it. Just look to the sidelines every Sunday. We call those people "coaches".
    • As much as I despise Billy B, his philosophy on QBs is how I would approach things if I were a GM. You always keep looking for your next starter.  He has Bledsoe, who got injured and his backup ended up being the GOAT. Even while he had that going, he kept getting his next guy and developing them. When Brady got hurt, Cassel stepped in and went 11-5 and they missed the wild card by dumb luck. Who knows how far they would have gone if they had gotten in. Jimmy Gs career started in NE. There were others, but he always kept looking.  You can't be afraid to keep looking for your next starter, but it looks like we're afraid to look for more than a marginal one. If you're going to offer a $25m contract with incentives, that screams marginal QB. It also screams you're just a transition until we find our guy. After a 10 or 11 win season, he's not accepting that offer. And then you're in a Daniel Jones situation. Do you pay for a year of success and pray it wasn't a one year wonder?  To this point, Bryce has really produced nothing, yet for whatever reason, our FO has not even sniffed at the idea that we need a real QB room with real QBs. Dalton was never starter potential, Plummer was a joke. KP certainly isn't, neither is Grier.  Our approach to the QB room needs to be one of strength not fear. Bring in guys who can compete or who you think can compete. This is THE elite position, in an elite sport, paid premium salary, where production matters. Either you produce or you can lose your job. It's not mean, it's just the reality of the position.  And I'm really just tired of our candy ass approach to it. 
    • If you plug Bryce onto the Pro Bowl roster you might have a chance to compete for a SB. If he's surrounded by top tier talent with a top tier defense on the other side, a field flipping punter, and a kicker good from 60+ you might have a chance. But that means you basically have to recreate Saban's Bama in the NFL and that's impossible... and Bryce couldn't win a championship in that environment either. What the Panthers didn't realize when they got so obsessed with his "PG mentality" was that what they were looking st was a "barely checks the box PG". The basketball equivalent of Bryce would be an undersized PG with marginal athleticism who can make the basic plays but adds nothing to the team in terms of elevating the overall team. Not a great shooter, not a great defender, not a great driver. Just a guy who can basically get you into the offense and be a matador on defense. Basically a placeholder while you look to upgrade the PG position. 
×
×
  • Create New...