Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes Vs blue jackets 7pm


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Day1PanthersFan said:

I wish Balley had exclusive rights to the Canes 

I hate random games on streaming services 

The announcers suck. You can’t hear the game noise at all with the mix. Just awful. 
 

Im not looking for the commentators to be at 140% noise and the ice to be at 5%. Like you can barely even hear the On/Off linesmen calls. 

Edited by Harbingers
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Stumpy said:

Tbf... Tripp made the same comment on the radio broadcast! Lol

Fair enough, but when trip does it he’s like “fug ya uninterrupted play!” “But we’ll have to take a break”. The announcer on the broadcast was essentially begging for a stoppage.

I was loving the 14 uninterrupted minutes of hockey. 

Edited by Harbingers
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Fair enough, but when trip does it he’s like “fug ya uninterrupted play!” “But we’ll have to take a break”. The announcer on the broadcast was essentially begging for a stoppage.

I was loving the 14 uninterrupted minutes of hockey. 

Tripp's was more along the lines of, "finally! I was beginning to think we'd never get a TV timeout..."

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • a 4th for him is well worth the risk.  It is also a low enough pick that it shouldn't really shake the locker room.  A 4th rounder that will sit this year and maybe take Pickett's spot next year or best case midseason where we can flip Kenny to a QB needy team midseason.  It's also a nice insurance policy for Young.  Especially with him sitting a year and learning the system.  Seems like a low risk move.  You can still draft one next year if needed and let them compete.  
    • He was draft eligible last year and chose to go back to transfer and play another year of college ball despite it being a weak QB draft and next year's considered to likely he far better and now people think teams are going to part with a higher pick than he would've gotten drafted with in April after it's come out that he's basically a degenerate gambling addict? What am I missing here? I'll be surprised if any team offers up more than a 5th and it won't surprise me if no one even offers that.
    • If You’re a team with multiple 1st round picks it would be a decent setup for a gamble - if I understand the rules.  You are bidding 2027 currency and get to use the player in 2026.     You get the season to look at him and if you are unhappy then you still have another 1st round pick for after the season. Two in the case of the Jets.   So if you mess it up there is a fast way to recover from it.  
×
×
  • Create New...